Socio-Economics History Blog

Socio-Economics & History Commentary

Putin: US Anti-Missile Defence Puts Europe in the Crosshairs

  • Published on May 27, 2016
    During a visit to Greece intended to repair ties with the EU, Vladimir Putin said that Russia has “no choice” but to target Romania, which has recently opened a NATO missile defense base, and Poland, which plans to do so within two years.

end

May 30, 2016 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

‘2017: War With Russia’ Ex-NATO Chief’s Fictional Story of Nuclear War Becomes Bestseller

  • Published on May 29, 2016
    NATO’s former deputy military chief in Europe says his book, a fictional story which describes a nuclear war with Russia over the Baltic nations taking place in 2017, is based on an ‘entirely plausible’ scenario.

Franklin_D_Roosevelt-In_Politics_nothing_happens_by_accident_it_was_planned_that_way

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/may/18/west-russia-on-course-for-war-nato-ex-deputy-commander

Click on image for article.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3600442/NATO-assembles-biggest-military-build-Cold-War-troops-deployed-eastern-Europe-deter-Russia.html

In war propaganda, you always present yourselves as righteous victims reacting defensively to the aggressive actions of the enemy. NATO is preparing for WW3 against Russia. Click on image for article.

bankster_war_debt_creation_financing_both_sides

http://www.henrymakow.com/illuminati_bankers_planned_wor.html

Click on image for article.

British_Historian_Major_General_JFC_Fuller-Western_Illuminati_semioccult_power_pushed_America_into_WW1

end

May 30, 2016 Posted by | GeoPolitics, Social Trends | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

NATO Mobilizing For War Along Russian Borders

http://sputniknews.com/europe/20160526/1040305720/nato-buildup-russia-war.html

Click on image for article.

end

May 30, 2016 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

UK To Stockpile Tanks, Heavy Equipment Close To Russia’s Border

https://www.rt.com/news/344751-uk-tanks-eastern-europe/

Click on image for article.

  • UK To Stockpile Tanks, Heavy Equipment Close To Russia’s Border
    by Tyler Durden, http://www.zerohedge.com  
    Following the May 12 launch of “Aegis Ashore“, the operational name of Washington’s European missile defense system based in Romania, which overnight swept away the tentative European nuclear arms race balance of power as it removed a Russian “first strike threat” thereby pressuring Russia to implement further nuclear offensive and defensive measures, Putin was livid, and as we reported yesterday, during his press conference with Greek PM Tsipras, the Russian president explicitly warned Poland and Romania that they are now in Russian first-strike crosshairs, and that Russia’s most likely response would be the deployment of SS-26 nuclear-capable tactical missiles.

    “If yesterday in those areas of Romania people simply did not know what it means to be in the cross-hairs, then today we will be forced to carry out certain measures to ensure our security,” Putin told a joint news conference in Athens with Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras. “It will be the same case with Poland,” he said.

    “We have the capability to respond. The whole world saw what our medium-range sea-based missiles are capable of [in Syria]. But we violate no agreements. And our ground-based Iskander missiles have also proven themselves as superb,” continued Putin.

    But what was most troubling, was Putin’s implicit warning that should NATO continue to escalate, and push ever more troops into countries neighboring Russia, the Kremlin would be unable to prevent a likewise escalatory response:“We’ve been repeating like a mantra that we will be forced to respond… Nobody wants to hear us. Nobody wants to conduct negotiations with us.

    And then, as if on cue, NATO made it even more explicit that its primary prerogative remains to provoke Russia into an offensive move, when over the weekend the Times reported that the British military may soon start stockpiling tanks and other heavy equipment in Eastern Europe as part of NATO’s military beef up close to Russia’s border. The decision may come at the upcoming NATO summit in Warsaw in July.

    read more.
Pentagram & NATO: "Those damned Russians! Let's nuke them before they nuke us!"

Pentagram & NATO: “Those damned Russians! Let’s nuke them before they nuke us!”

end

May 30, 2016 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

‘I Wouldn’t Go into Central London Through June or July. ENGLAND – BOOM’: British ISIS Recruiter Known as Mrs Terror Issues Chilling Threat of Summer Terror Campaign

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3609046/I-wouldn-t-Central-London-June-July-ENGLAND-BOOM-British-ISIS-recruiter-known-Mrs-Terror-issues-chilling-threat-summer-terror-campaign.html

Click on image for article.

https://socioecohistory.wordpress.com/2013/06/06/trevor-aaronson-inside-the-fbis-manufactured-war-on-terror/

Click on image for article.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/reuters/article-3602670/Islamic-State-calls-attacks-West-Ramadan-audio-message.html

Click on image for article.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/665569/Belgium-nuclear-attack-iodine-pills-Brussels-attacks-nuclear-power-plant

ISIS, Al Qaeda … = CIA jihadists. Click on image for article.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/555434/Islamic-State-ISIS-Smuggler-THOUSANDS-Extremists-into-Europe-Refugees

All warfare is based on deception! Sun Tzu, The Art of War. Click on image for article.

https://www.rt.com/uk/340367-isis-nuclear-threat-eu/

Click on image for article.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/657300/David-Cameron-Terrorists-ISIS-Islamic-State-Daesh-Nuclear-Summit-World-Leaders-Britain

Click on image for article.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3516207/Harvard-researcher-warns-ISIS-brink-using-nuclear-weapons.html

Illuminist psyop / propaganda. Click on image for article.

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/mar/07/isis-planning-enormous-and-spectacular-attacks-uk-counter-terrorism-chief-warns

Click on image for article.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3253789/Isis-planning-nuclear-holocaust-wipe-hundreds-millions-face-earth-claims-reporter-embedded-extremists.html

The psychological warfare against the sheeple can only be successful with the aid of the Illuminist MSM. Click on image for article.

end

May 27, 2016 Posted by | GeoPolitics, Social Trends | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Will The November US Presidential Election Bring The End Of The World?

WW3 is near?

WW3 is near?

  • Will The November US Presidential Election Bring The End Of The World?
    by Paul Craig Roberts, http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/  
    “We have been watching for nearly a month a steady buildup of American and NATO forces along Russia’s borders – on land, on sea and in the air. There has been nothing like this on Russia’s borders, such an amassing of hostile military force, since the German invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941.”

    So concludes America’s leading Russian expert, Professor Stephen Cohen (Princeton and New York University). http://www.globalresearch.ca/russia-has-not-seen-such-amassing-of-hostile-military-forces-on-its-borders-since-1941/5526562 

    Professor Cohen asks if Washington is sleepwalking and needs to wake up or whether Washington has gone crazy and intends war. Pepe Escobar advises Washington to “beware what you wish for: Russia is ready for war.”http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article44725.htm 

    Escobar reports that recently the Rand Corporation, “essentially a CIA outpost,” concluded that “Russia could overrun NATO in a mere 60 hours, if not less.” On the level of nukes and missile systems, Russia is four generations ahead of the US military/security complex, which is mainly interested in inflating profits with cost overruns. US weapons systems are simply outclassed.

    Nevertheless, the Russian high command is concerned with the Russian government’s low-key response to Washington’s aggression. The generals blame the “Atlanticists Integrationists” who infect Putin’s government. This faction is believed to be organized around Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev and believes Russia should make concessions to Washington in order to be accepted as part of the West. The incompetent Russian central bank and neoliberal economists are part of the faction whose goal is to be part of the West regardless of its impact on Russian independence from Washington’s Empire.

    Stephen Cohen and Alastair Crooke, a former British secret agent, almost alone in the West have noticed that the Russian military and predominant part of the government that emphasizes national sovereignty are putting pressure on President Putin to eliminate those in the government who are willing to compromise Russia’s independence in order to gain acceptance by Washington.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alastair-crooke/putin-west-war_b_9991162.html 

    This has been my own opinion for some time. It is impossible to adequately stand up to an external threat when unreliable elements are part of the threatened government.

    read more.

Chester_Ward_One_World_Government_CFR

end

May 26, 2016 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

NATO Nuclear War Hype Goes Ballistic

http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/warisaracket.html

Click on image to goto book.

bankster_war_debt_creation_financing_both_sides

  • NATO Nuclear War Hype Goes Ballistic
    by Jim Dean, http://journal-neo.org/  
    … While I am credited as the creator of the byline “You just can’t make this stuff up”, I must now add an addendum to that, the NATO exception, because they make it up all the time.

    And, just when we figure they have flogged the Russian Bear threat to death, almost as badly as the retired Iran nuclear weapon threat, here we have British General Shirreff, former Deputy Supreme Comr. for NATO, pitching his fictional book about a nuclear war with Russia, in 2017 mind you, and over the Baltics no less.

    This is the kind of ploy that an Intelligence agency would use to seed a repetitive fear message into the public’s consciousness via a series of high ranking officials to give support to a geopolitical psyops game they are running. We now have General Shirreff as a book end to American General Breedlove, who told us all about the amassed Russian army on Ukraine’s eastern border that was ready to sweep across Ukraine in three days.

    The only problem with that tall tale was that despite Moscow’s holding long planned exercises in the area, none of the experienced observers who attended ever reported seeing this invasion army. Since that day, we have had a never ending echo chamber of claims of Russian aggression toward Europe, but where no one felt it was necessary to provide any proof. General Breedlove never showed us any satellite photos of all the huge stockpiles in forward bases that could have easily be viewable for an invasion, and he never apologized for the lie.

    General Shirreff was not very creative in his scare pitch. He trotted out the false claim of Russia invading Georgia when it has long been on the record that the Georgian’s began the war with a general shelling of Tskhinvali. The Wikipedia version of event is a bad joke.

    The classified story has Tskhinvali being shelled on and off during the early morning of August 8th while a large commando unit from a 3rd country was taking out the Russian peacekeepers positions and light armor to clear the way for the victorious Georgian army to roll in when dawn came. The visiting commandos flew home that morning and were not around when the Russians took their airfield base a few days later.

    I share this with you because Shirreff trotted this out in his propaganda recital during his BBC interview, “He [Putin] has invaded Georgia, he has invaded the Crimea, he has invaded Ukraine. He has used force and got [sic] away with it.” And then the general dropped his nuclear bomb, “The chilling fact is that, because Russia hardwires nuclear thinking and capability to every aspect of their defense capability, this would be nuclear war.”

    Shirreff was playing off ex-NATO General Wesley Clark’s tooting the Russian nuclear threat horn earlier in May to CNN with this silly comment, “They are using nuclear weapons in their military exercise as a means of deescalating a conflict, as though they could fire a nuclear weapon at, say, Warsaw, and then NATO would say, “Oh, my goodness, we did not know you really mean it,” the former NATO commander said.

    These media interviews are all theater staging. NATO knows that Russia will be responding to the military moves to its borders and will use its advantage of internal lines of communication and whatever firepower needed to defend itself. After all, it is the US that changed its defense doctrine to include first strikes for really any reason it chose, giving itself a blank check. And this was done under Clinton in peacetime, mind you.

    When Russia makes deployments to counter moves NATO has made, we will have maybe even these same generals doing more interviews that those moves are proof of Russia’s aggressive intentions. More than a few American military and intelligence people are embarrassed by this cheap manipulation of the public. The Russian threat is as non-existent as the Iran nuclear one that our Veterans Today’s nuclear expert Clinton Bastin, 40 years with the Dept. of Energy, debunked for us in detail before he died.

    read more.
MSM: Weapons of Mass Deception for Wars without end !

MSM: Weapons of Mass Deception for Wars without end !

http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles_2011/Bastin_Interview.pdf

Click on image to goto report.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/09/26/netanyahu-caught-ignoring-top-iaea-no-iran-bomb-report/

Click on image to goto website.

https://socioecohistory.wordpress.com/2014/11/17/flashback-1939-catholic-priest-exposes-war-agenda-the-propagandists-are-at-work-in-government-in-journalism-and-in-the-cinemas-forewarned-is-forearmed/

Click on image for article.

end

May 25, 2016 Posted by | GeoPolitics, Social Trends | , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Can Russia Survive Washington’s Attack? Thermonuclear WW3!

World War 3 is near?

World War 3 is near?

  • Can Russia Survive Washington’s Attack?
    by Paul Craig Roberts, http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/  
    It is not only American generals who are irresponsible and declare on the basis of no evidence whatsoever that “Russia is an existential threat to the United States” and also to the Baltic states, Poland, Georgia, Ukraine, and all of Europe. British generals also participate in the warmongering.  UK retired general and former NATO commander Sir Richard Shirreff, Deputy Supreme Allied Commander in Europe until 2014, has just declared that nuclear war with Russia is “entirely possible” within the year.  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3596977/The-outbreak-nuclear-war-year-West-Putin-entirely-plausible-says-former-NATO-chief-promoting-novel-2017-war-Russia.html   

    My loyal readers know that I, myself, have been warning for some time about the likelihood of nuclear war.  However, there is a vast difference between me and the Western generals.  I see the war as the consequence of the neoconservative drive for US world hegemony.  The neoconservative drive for world hegemony is acknowledged by the neoconservatives themselves in their public position papers, and it has a 15 year record of being implemented in America’s many and ongoing wars in the Middle East and Africa.  Although the Presstitute media does its best to keep our focus away from the known facts, the facts remain known.

    The position of the Western generals is that “Russian aggression” is driving an innocent America/NATO to nuclear war.  

    Here is General Shirreff’s list of “Russian aggressions”: “He [Putin] has invaded Georgia, he has invaded the Crimea, he has invaded Ukraine. He has used force and got away with it.  In a period of tension, an attack on the Baltic states… is entirely plausible.” Shirreff is talking about make-believe happenings that even if real would be taking place inside what were until recently Russia’s long-standing national boundaries. 

    General Shirreff strikes me as either uninformed or a dissembler. It is the United States and Israel who use force and get away with it. The Russian invasion of the former Russian province, Georgia, was a response to the American puppet government’s invasion of South Ossetia in which the American and israeli trained and equipped Georgian troops killed Russian peace-keeping troops and a large number of South Ossetian civilians while the Russian government was at the Beijing olympics. 

    It only took a small fraction of the Russian Army a few hours to roll up the American and Israeli trained Georgian Army.  Putin had the former Russian province in his hand. He could have hung the American puppet president and reincorporated Georgia back into Russia, where if probably belongs, having spent all of modern history in that location.

    But Putin did not see Georgia as a prize, and having made his point, let the Americans have their puppet state back.  The president at the time, a scummy scoundrel, was thrown out of the country by Georgians and now serves the American puppet state of Ukraine, like so many others who are not Ukrainian. Apparently, Washington can’t find enough Ukrainians who will sell out their country for Washington and has to bring in foreigners to help Washington rule Ukraine.

    There has been, alas, no Russian invasion of Ukraine.  Putin would not even accept the pleas of the Russian majority populations in the breakaway provinces of Donetsk and Luhansk to be reincorporated back into Russia where they belong. If Putin actually wanted Ukraine, he doesn’t need to send in an army.  He can take back the eastern and southern parts just by accepting the pleas of the people to again be a part of Russia.

    The only plea that Putin accepted was that of the Crimeans, who with an extremely high turnout never experienced in “western democracies” voted 97.6 percent to rejoin Russia, where Crimea resided for longer than the US has existed, until Khrushchev, a Ukrainian, transferred Crimea from the Russian Soviet Republic to the Ukrainian Soviet Republic when both were provinces of the Soviet Union. 

    read more.

end

May 24, 2016 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Last Time Russia Has Last Seen Such Amassing of Hostile Forces on Its Borders was in 1941

Pentagram & NATO: "Those damned Russians! Let's nuke them before they nuke us!"

Pentagram & NATO: “Those damned Russians! Let’s nuke them before they nuke us!”

  • The Last Time Russia Has Last Seen Such Amassing of Hostile Forces on Its Borders was in 1941
    by http://sputniknews.com/  
    Russia has not seen such a major military buildup close to its borders since 1941 when the Third Reich sent the Wehrmacht to conquer the Soviet Union, Professor Stephen F. Cohen said in his recent interview on The John Batchelor Show, referring to NATO’s increasingly assertive strategy in Eastern Europe and the Baltics.

    “We have been watching for nearly a month a steady buildup of American and NATO forces along near Russia’s borders – on land, on sea and in the air,” he said. “There has been nothing like this on Russia’s borders, such an amassing of hostile military force, since the German invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941.”

    Russia has been concerned with NATO’s overall strategy and its recent moves particularly. Last week the US completed its first land-based component of the Aegis missile shield at an air base near Deveselu, Romania. A day later, the alliance held a groundbreaking ceremony in Poland. The Aegis Ashore base is scheduled to be deployed in Redzikowo by 2018.

    Moscow has warned that the system could be detrimental for global peace and stability. NATO officials have tried to alleviate Russian concerns by saying that the Aegis system is purely defensive, but Cohen warned that it the complex could be used for other purposes.

    “Somebody said that the only defensive weapon in military history is a foxhole; everything else could be used for offensive purposes. [NATO’s missile defense system] could be used for offensive purposes. They can launch cruise missiles,” he observed.

    Russian officials and experts have also questioned whether it was reasonable to build a shield that is supposed to protect the West against Iran’s ballistic missiles considering that Tehran does not pose any threat to its neighbors and beyond.

    The Islamic Republic is not the real target. “The majority of our missile defense installations … are directed at Russia. They are not directed at Iran, that’s a fairytale. The government puts it out, but nobody believes it,” the analyst noted.

    Professor Cohen has long warned that Washington’s policies towards Russia have been the key reason for the recent cold spell in relations between the two global powers. This trend appears to be getting more dangerous.

    “Are we sleepwalking towards an actual war with Russia or is this a plan to provoke a war with Russia?” he asked. “If we are sleepwalking, we all need to yell, ‘Wake up!’ If they actually now would not mind a war with Russia, then they are crazy. Because there is no way if there is war with Russia on Russia’s borders that eventually some kind of nuclear weapons will not come into play.”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3500299/Europe-closer-using-nuclear-weapons-time-end-Cold-War-warns-former-Russian-foreign-minister.html

Click on image for article.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/610780/US-Russia-military-showdown-INEVITABLE-MI6-ISIS-strikes

MI5/6 is an Illuminist intelligence agency ie. Satanic. The serpents are practically telling you their WW3 plans. Click on image for article.

http://sputniknews.com/columnists/20151215/1031786484/russia-ready-war.html

Click on image for article.

http://sputniknews.com/russia/20151214/1031709613/nato-russia-buildup.html

Click on image for article.

http://www.infowars.com/russia-to-deploy-new-doomsday-plane-in-readiness-for-nuclear-war/

Click on image for article.

end

May 24, 2016 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why on Earth Would Russia Attack the Baltics?

Hermann-Goering-Ppropaganda_for_War2

Baltic_States-Lithuania_Latvia_Estonia

  • Why on Earth Would Russia Attack the Baltics?
    by Doug Bandow, http://nationalinterest.org/  
    When the Cold War closed many people believed that history had ended. Peace had descended upon the earth.

    Alas, it hasn’t worked out that way. But no worries. At least NATO officials are happy. Following Russian intervention in Georgia and Ukraine the alliance rediscovered a sense of purpose through its old enemy, Moscow. The Obama administration just announced a multi-billion dollar program to bolster U.S. forces in Eastern Europe. Now a Rand Corporation report warning that Russia could easily overrun the three Baltic members of NATO is raising additional alarm.

    Said David A. Shlapak and Michael W. Johnson: the “unambiguous” result of a series of war games was that “As currently postured, NATO cannot successfully defend the territory of its most exposed members.” Russia’s forces took at most 60 hours to reach the Estonian and Latvian capitals. Such an invasion would leave the alliance only with bad options:

    “a bloody counteroffensive, fraught with escalatory risk, to liberate the Baltics; to escalate itself, as it threatened to do to avert defeat during the Cold War; or to concede at least temporary defeat, with uncertain but predictably disastrous consequences for the Alliance and, not incidentally, the people of the Baltics.”

    The Rand researchers recommended a substantial allied—which, in practice, means U.S.—military presence. Seven brigades, three armored, would “prevent the rapid overrun of the Baltic states.” This would prevent Moscow from, as the report says,

    “being able to confront NATO with a stunning coup de main that cornered it as described above, an attack on the Baltics would instead trigger a prolonged and serious war between Russia and a materially far wealthier and more powerful coalition, a war Moscow must fear it would be likely to lose.”

    Shalapak and Johnson dismissed the cost, estimated at around $2.7 billion, but more commitments require more force structure, and that burden almost certainly would fall upon America rather than the Europeans. Just like the administration’s new initiative for Eastern Europe involving a single brigade. Nevertheless, argued the report’s authors, better to deter than invite “a devastating war.”

    Yet the surging fear over Russian adventurism distorts Moscow’s interests and ambitions. Vladimir Putin is a nasty fellow, brutal at home and abroad. However, he seems to well represent much of his country’s power elite and public. There is little apparent support for Western-style liberalism. Oust Putin and “le deluge” to follow would not likely be pretty.

    Putin’s behavior is bad, but poses little threat to America, “old” Europe or even most of Russia’s neighbors. He is behaving like a traditional Tsar, not a reincarnated Joseph Stalin or Adolf Hitler. He has taken Moscow back to the Russian Empire, not the Soviet Union. His government is not interested in an ideological crusade and sees no inherent conflict with the West. Rather, Moscow demands respect for its status, protection of Russia’s borders and consideration of its interests. In pursuing these ends Putin is practical and measured, if perhaps imprudent and myopic—and, of course, dismissive of the cost to others.

    Putin continues to demonstrate no interest in ruling those likely to resist Russia’s tender mercies. Ukrainians and Georgians would not likely act like docile Russian citizens today. Indeed, the former resisted the restoration of Soviet control after German forces were expelled in World War II. Nor was occupation necessary to bar those nations’ way to NATO.

    Seizing the Baltic states likely would generate similar resistance. They developed separate identities under the Russian Empire and enjoyed brief independence between World Wars I and II. They also have the advantage of having joined NATO before Moscow could cause much trouble.

    Finally, the Baltic ethnic Russian populations, though significant, demonstrate little sentiment for joining Mother Russia. They prefer cultural connection to political affiliation, creating a poor target for the sort of destabilizing tactics deployed against Ukraine. Wrote Robert Person, a professor at West Point: “the Baltic Russians are not particularly amenable to Russian hybrid warfare. Though they have many lingering grievances over language, cultural and citizenship policies, these grievances have not translated into separatism.”

    So what would Russia gain from attacking the Baltics? A recalcitrant, majority non-ethnic Russian population. A possible temporary nationalist surge at home. A likely short-lived victory over the West.

    The costs would be far greater. Grabbing the Baltics likely would spur population exodus and trigger economic collapse. Launching a war without the convincing pretext present in the cases of Georgia and Ukraine might leave the Russian public angry over the retaliation certain to come. Worse, Moscow certainly would rupture economic and political relations with the United States and Europe and probably start a losing conventional war with NATO. Even more frightening would be the prospect of a nuclear conflict, whether intentional or inadvertent.

    Russia has destroyed Europe’s peaceful equilibrium, but everything about Putin’s presidency so far argues against reckless war for no rational purpose against the Baltics. Of course, they should act to reduce even minimal chances of such a war. However, Washington should not launch a multi-billion dollar allied build-up, one which, ironically, would create a perceived threat to Russia where none currently exists.

    read more.
http://english.pravda.ru/russia/politics/23-12-2010/116336-wikileaks_reveals_nato_attack_plan_against_russia-0/

Click on image for article.

http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/09/18/exclusive-the-pentagon-is-preparing-new-war-plans-for-a-baltic-battle-against-russia/

Click on image for article.

end

May 24, 2016 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Illuminati Globalists Want Russia NATO Nuclear War

  • Published on May 19, 2016
    Alex Jones discusses the insanity of the global elite and how their plan for domination has now become a plan for total global destruction.

Myron_Fagan_Illuminati_Engineered_Conflicts

From: Vintage 'Trees' music video. All humanity forming a pyramid worshipping, welcoming the Satanic capstone! The Anti-Christ, the bringer of false peace, the white horseman of Revelation 6 ! The completion of the New World Order project, in a world wrecked by global wars, collapse and chaos!

From: Vintage ‘Trees’ music video. All humanity forming a pyramid worshipping, welcoming the Satanic capstone! The Anti-Christ, the bringer of false peace, the white horseman of Revelation 6 ! The completion of the New World Order project, in a world wrecked by global wars, collapse and chaos!

Texe_Marrs_Satanic_Masonic_Doctrine_Circle_of_Intrigue

end

May 20, 2016 Posted by | GeoPolitics, Social Trends | , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ex-General Says NATO-Russia Nuclear War ‘Possible Within a Year’

WW3 is near?

WW3 is near?

  • Ex-General Says NATO-Russia Nuclear War ‘Possible Within a Year’
    by https://www.rt.com/news/  
    NATO’s former deputy military chief in Europe says his book, a fictional story which describes a nuclear war with Russia over the Baltic nations taking place in 2017, is based on an “entirely plausible” scenario.

    General Sir Richard Shirreff, from Britain, served at the second-highest NATO military office in Europe between 2011 and 2014. He says his experience acquired in the alliance of war-gaming future conflicts helped him model the narrative for the book.

    According to his scenario, starting next year Russia would first occupy Ukraine to secure a land route to Crimea and then invade the three Baltic nations, all of which are members of NATO. The move, Shirreff argued, would be driven by the perception of NATO’s weakness and Russia’s opposition to what it sees as the alliance’s attempts to encircle it.

    “We need to judge President [Vladimir] Putin by his deeds not his words,” the retired general told BBC Radio 4’s Today program. “He has invaded Georgia, he has invaded the Crimea, he has invaded Ukraine. He has used force and got away with it.”

    The supposed invasion of Georgia in 2008 was Russia’s response to a Georgian attack on its breakaway region of South Ossetia, which started with the killings of Russian peacekeepers stationed there to prevent such hostilities. Russia responded by defeating the NATO-trained Georgian Army and withdrew. Moscow later recognized South Ossetia as a sovereign state, formalizing its de facto independence from Georgia that had been in place since the 1990s.

    The supposed invasion of Ukraine in 2014 was Russia’s use of its troops, which were legally deployed in Crimea under a treaty with Ukraine, to prevent hostilities after an armed coup in Kiev. The Crimean people, who overwhelmingly opposed the new Ukrainian government and its nationalistic leanings, voted in a referendum to part ways with Ukraine and rejoin Russia.

    If Russia used military force against any NATO members, the entire alliance would be obliged to declare war on Russia. The US is the most powerful member of NATO and has the world’s biggest military force. According to Shirreff, Russia would use its nuclear arsenal to counter NATO’s response.

    “Be under no illusion whatsoever – Russian use of nuclear weapons is hardwired into Moscow’s military strategy,”
    he said, omitting the fact that NATO’s nuclear nations – the US, Britain and France – have always kept a pre-emptive nuclear strike as a possible option. Russia dropped its pledge not to use nuclear weapons first in 1993.


    A scenario of conflict between Russia and NATO members over one of the Baltic states was earlier explored by the BBC in a film, which focused on decision-making at a British advisory body responding to the crisis. In the film, the stand-off escalated into a full-scale nuclear conflict and the advisers contemplating an option to destroy Russia’s biggest cities with Trident missiles.
http://english.pravda.ru/russia/politics/23-12-2010/116336-wikileaks_reveals_nato_attack_plan_against_russia-0/

Click on image for article.

http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/09/18/exclusive-the-pentagon-is-preparing-new-war-plans-for-a-baltic-battle-against-russia/

Click on image for article.

http://sputniknews.com/russia/20151214/1031709613/nato-russia-buildup.html

Click on image for article.

end

May 19, 2016 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

British General Says A Nuclear War With Russia In 2017 Is “Entirely Plausible”

World War 3 Coming Soon Nuclear Blast

  • British General Says A Nuclear War With Russia In 2017 Is “Entirely Plausible”
    by Tyler Durden, http://www.zerohedge.com  
    With tensions between Russia and the West at post-cold war highs, a former NATO deputy military chief is now saying that a nuclear war with Russia over the Baltic nations in 2017 is “entirely plausible” according to RT.

    General Sir Richard Shirreff, from Britain, served at the second highest NATO military office in Europe between 2011 and 2014, has written a fictional book about a nuclear war with Russia in 2017 triggered by a dispute of the Baltic nations. While the story is indeed fictional, Shirreff said the story is based on an “entirely plausible” scenario.

    The scenario in which Shirreff lays out is that Russia would first occupy Ukraine to secure a land route to Crimea and then invade the three Baltic nations, all of which are members of NATO. Shirreff claims Russia will do this because it feels that NATO is perceived as weak, and Russia will be oppositional about what it sees as the alliance’s attempt to encircle it.

    “We need to judge President Putin by his deeds not his words. He has invaded Georgia, he has invaded the Crimea, he has invaded Ukraine. He has used force and got away with it”
    the retired General told BBC.

end

May 19, 2016 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Main Threat of Nuclear War Comes From US: Expert

May 18, 2016 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

US Activates Missile Defense Site in Romania

May 14, 2016 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,141 other followers