Socio-Economics History Blog

Socio-Economics & History Commentary

What the North Korean “Crisis” is Really About: Pretext to Nuke Both Russia and China?

WW3 is near?

  • What the North Korean “Crisis” is Really About: Pretext to Nuke Both Russia and China?
    by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, http://www.globalresearch.ca/
    The North Korean “crisis” is a Washington orchestration. North Korea was last at war 1950-53. N. Korea has not attacked or invaded anyone in 64 years. N. Korea lacks the military strength to attack any country, such as South Korea and Japan, that is protected by the US.  Moreover, China would not permit N. Korea to start a war.

    So what is the demonization of N. Korea by the presstitutes and Trump administration about?

    It is about the same thing that the demonization of Iran was about. The “Iranian threat” was an orchestration that was used as cover to put US anti-ballistic missile bases on Russia’s borders. An anti-ballistic missile (ABM) is intended to intercept and destroy nuclear-armed ICBMs (intercontinental ballistic missiles) and prevent them from reaching their targets.  

    Washington claimed that the anti-ABM bases were not directed at Russia, but were for the protection of Europe against Iran’s nuclear ICBMs.  Insouciant Americans might have believed this, but the Russians surely did not as Iran has neither ICBMs nor nuclear weapons.  The Russian government has made it clear that Russia understands the US bases are directed at preventing a Russian retaliation against a Washington first strike.

    The Chinese government also is not stupid. The Chinese leadership understands that the reason for the N. Korean “crisis” is to provide cover for Washington to put anti-ballistic missile sites near China’s border.

    In other words, Washington is creating a shield against nuclear retaliation from both Russia and China from a US nuclear first strike against both countries.

    China has been more forceful in its reply to Washington’s efforts than have the Russians. China has demanded an immediate halt to the US deployment of missiles in South Korea. 

    https://www.rt.com/news/386828-china-thaad-south-korea/
      


    In order to keep Americans confused, Washington now calls anti-ABMs THAAD, Terminal High Altitude Area Defense. China understands that THAAD has nothing whatsoever to do with N. Korea, which borders S. Korea, making it pointless for N. Korea to attack S. Korea with ICBMs.

    THAAD in S. Korea is directed against China’s retaliatory forces.  It is part of Washington’s preparations to nuke both Russia and China with minimal consequence to the US, although Europe would certainly be completely destroyed as THAAD or anti-ABMs are useless against Russian nuclear cruise missiles and the Russian air force.

    But no Empire has ever cared about the fate of its vassals, and Washington is uninterested in Europe’s fate. Washington is interested only in its hegemony over the world.

    The question is: now that Russia and China understand that Washington is preparing for a preemptive nuclear strike against them in order to remove the two constraints on Washington’s unilateral behavior, will the two countries sit there and wait for the strike?

    read more.
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/04/27/washington-plans-nuke-russia-china/

Click on image for article.

https://www.rt.com/news/386276-us-missile-shield-russia-strike/

Click on image for article.

end

May 6, 2017 - Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: