Clif High: Trump Wins By Landslide, Polls 100% Manufactured. Silver The Metal to Own — Huge Demand Coming
- Clif High: Trump Wins By Landslide-Polls 100% Manufactured. Silver The Metal to Own — Huge Demand Coming
by Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com
Internet data mining expert Clif High says the “naked data” on the Internet shows Trump winning the 2016 Presidential election by a “landslide.” High explains, “You can do a search on YouTube that brings back a list of primary speeches by both candidates. I am not talking about Fred Smith’s copy of a video he made of Trump. I am talking about a speech took officially of Trump, and they released it officially. If you take just those, you can see you’ve got Hillary Clinton on one side with 2,165 views, and Trump on the other side with 775,653 views. So, that is not anecdotal. This is a very crude level of statistical analysis, but it is nonetheless statistical analysis, and it is very pointed because it is extremely self-selecting. There is nobody watching you when you choose to watch something on YouTube. So, there is no peer pressure or external person polling you. . . . It’s what I call a very naked data set because there is no pressure on an emotional level on people.”
How big is Trump winning by? High says, “Basically, when you go through all the analysis and all the other video archives, you come up with a 25 to 1 ratio (in favor of Trump). High says the Trump’s winning vote total will be orders of magnitude greater than Clinton’s. High uses a program he invented that he says uses the “art of predictive linguistics” to forecast future events. One of the phrases that High comes up with in his own linguistic data mining program is “Hillary is missing.”High’s data also comes up with the phrase “It doesn’t matter.” High explains, “This is all tied up with one other phrase and that is ‘It doesn’t matter.’ That is a very interesting phrase to come up in our data set because usually they’re not at a hard level making a conclusion. That’s what ‘It does not matter’ is. It’s a conclusion. It’s a conclusion about a set of circumstances or facts. We rarely get straight out conclusions. . . . It is my interpretation that the Deep State may be so fixated on their candidate winning that it won’t matter how the election actually comes out. There is another layer on top of that that is seen in our recent data . . . the focus is economic, fiscal or financial pointedness . . . it may be saying the election part does not matter. If we take that interpretation, we are talking about the dollar and everything else in the economic system.”
No comments yet.