Socio-Economics History Blog

Socio-Economics & History Commentary

Bloomberg: Abolish Cash to Create a Freer Market

Click on image for article.

  • Bloomberg: Abolish Cash to Create a Freer Market
    Want a Free Market? Abolish Cash … If you believe that government meddling in financial markets was responsible for the last recession and the lackluster recovery, you might be right. But probably not in the way you think.  – Bloomberg

    Some Bloomberg editorials are stranger than others. This one is especially strange because it argues that banning cash will create a stronger, freer market. How does a government ban on certain items make anything freer? We don’t understand. Here’s Bloomberg’s logic:

    Two government mechanisms prevent real interest rates from getting too negative. The first is cash: As long as people can hold currency, which loses its value only at the rate of inflation, they won’t buy safe assets that yield even less.

    The second is the central bank’s promise to keep the inflation rate low and stable — at about 2 percent in most developed nations. As a result, people have little reason to hold any asset that yields less than negative 2 percent (perhaps negative 3 percent, considering that cash is bulky and hard to store).

    In other words, governments — by issuing cash and managing inflation — put a floor on how low interest rates can go and how high asset prices can rise. That’s hardly a free market.

    Say what? The reason rates are so low in the first place is because of monopoly central banking, which exists in the US only because Congress voted to create the Federal Reserve. The Fed is a monopoly money facility. It is not a free-market creation.

    So the logic of this editorial is that because the Fed has irrationally damped rates – as part of a larger move to ruin economies and bring in a global central bank – the US government should ban cash and unleash negative rates.

    The result of all this government and central bank price fixing will allow a “free-market” to operate more powerfully and efficiently. Wow.

    The right answer is to abolish currency and move completely to electronic cash, an idea suggested at various times by Marvin Goodfriend of Carnegie-Mellon University, Miles Kimball of the University of Colorado and Andrew Haldane of the Bank of England.

    Without cash, interest rates “would be able go as far into negative territory as the market required.” 

    The corollary here is that some people, like retirees and seniors, might get very angry about negative rates. But there’s a solution to that too: “If a government wants to redistribute resources to the elderly or the poor, it’s much better off just giving them money.”

    So now we have a third, comprehensive government program. First, ban cash. Second release negative rates. Third, give money to retirees to compensate for the lack of interest.

    read more.

Click on image for article.

Click on image for article.

Click on image for article.

Click on image for article.


September 5, 2016 - Posted by | Economics, EndTimes, GeoPolitics, Social Trends | , , , , , , , , , ,

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: