Socio-Economics History Blog

Socio-Economics & History Commentary

WW III? China Tells Citizens to Prepare for “A People’s War at Sea”

http://en.people.cn/n3/2016/0802/c90000-9094376.html

Click on image for article.

  • WW III? China Tells Citizens to Prepare for “A People’s War at Sea”
    by Claire Bernish, http://thefreethoughtproject.com/  
    In continued rejection of last month’s ruling by a Hague-based tribunal invalidating China’s territorial claims to a vast swath of the South China Sea, on Tuesday, the Chinese defense minister urged for “substantial preparation for a people’s war at sea.”

    Chinese Defense Minister Chang Wanquan also warned of “offshore security threats” and the need to acknowledge the gravity of risk to China’s national security; and advised the military, police, and populace to ready for mobilization to defend national sovereignty and territorial integrity, according to state news agency, Xinhua.

    None of this bellicose rhetoric and escalation is occurring in a vacuum, of course, and while Americans seem content to analyze whether Donald Trump has experienced a psychological break or bemoan the fact Hillary Clinton hasn’t landed in federal custody, the United States meanwhile barrels toward war with China and its ally, Russia.

    China’s assertions of provocation by the U.S. — backed by the deployment of an armada of ships to the South China Sea, as well as nuclear bombers to the Pacific — its rejection of the tribunal’s ruling, and promises to aggressively defend its interests at sea all point toward impending military conflict.

    Claiming it wishes to ensure freedom of navigation in the geostrategically important region, the U.S. has conducted a number of military drills in the hotly-contested waters — but its premise of defense against Chinese aggression halfway around the world hardly masks what would be rightly called outright instigation.

    “China doesn’t want wars, a war with the U.S. in particular,”
    the Global China Times wrote in an op-ed response to a Rand Corporation report showing China would suffer heavy losses should the two nations engage in military conflict. “The only possible scenario for a Sino-US war is that the U.S. corners China on its doorstep with unacceptable provocations and China has to fight back.”

    It added darkly, “We will be very prudent about going to war, but if a war is triggered, we will have greater determination than the U.S. to fight it to the end and we can endure more losses than the U.S.”

    On Tuesday, China’s top court ruled there exists a “clear legal basis for China to safeguard maritime order, marine safety and interests, and to exercise integrated management over the country’s jurisdictional seas.”

    read more.
http://www.infowars.com/china-not-frightened-to-fight-a-war-with-us-after-warship-incident/

Click on image for article.

http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asiapacific/china-warships-warned-us/2222210.html

Click on image for article.

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/05/19/china-says-its-ready-if-us-stirs-up-any-conflict-in-south-china-sea.html

If you don’t hear the drums of war, you are death or stupid or both! Click on image for article.

http://217.218.67.231/Detail/2016/02/18/450978/US-China-Kerry-Obama-Woody-Island-South-China-Sea-Russia/

Click on image for article.

http://sputniknews.com/us/20150618/1023508506.html

Click on image for article.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/11630185/US-China-war-inevitable-unless-Washington-drops-demands-over-South-China-Sea.html

Click on image for article.

end

August 6, 2016 - Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , , , , ,

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: