Socio-Economics History Blog

Socio-Economics & History Commentary

Unbelievable Scam of Cancer Industry Blown Wide Open: $100 Billion a Year Spent on Toxic Chemotherapy for Many FAKE Diagnoses … National Cancer Institute’s Shocking Admission Affects Millions of Patients

http://www.endalldisease.com/chemostudy-endalldisease.pdf

Click on image for article.

  • Unbelievable Scam of Cancer Industry Blown Wide Open: $100 Billion a Year Spent on Toxic Chemotherapy for Many FAKE Diagnoses … National Cancer Institute’s Shocking Admission Affects Millions of Patients
    by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, http://www.naturalnews.com/  
    (NaturalNews) With $100 billion a year now being spent on toxic chemotherapy treatments that damage patients and cause “chemo brain” side effects, a panel of cancer experts commissioned by the National Cancer Institute publicly admitted two years ago that tens of millions of “cancer cases” aren’t cancer at all.

    Tens of millions of people who have been diagnosed with “cancer” by crooked oncologists — and scared into medically unjustified but extremely profitable chemotherapy treatments — never had any sort of life-threatening condition to begin with, scientists have confirmed.

    “The word ‘cancer’ often invokes the specter of an inexorably lethal process; however, cancers are heterogeneous and can follow multiple paths, not all of which progress to metastases and death, and include indolent disease that causes no harm during the patient’s lifetime,” says the abstract of the published study entitled Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment in Cancer An Opportunity for Improvement(JAMA. 2013;310(8):797-798. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.108415)

    The article goes on to explain that many tissue lesions in human biology are being diagnosed with the scary-sounding term “cancer” even though they would not lead to any real harm in the body even if left untreated.

    $100 billion a year generated by the cancer industry to treat many patients who never had “real” cancer in the first place
    Oncologists and the breast cancer industry prey on systematic over-diagnosis of cancer in order to scare patients into unnecessary treatments. These treatments are helping generate $100 billion a year in chemotherapy revenues, often for so-called “cancers” that shouldn’t even count as cancer in the first place.

    “Physicians, patients and the general public must recognize that overdiagnosis is common and occurs more frequently with cancer screening,” warns the NCI-commissioned science article in JAMA.

    A 2002 editorial in the Annals of Internal Medicine maintained that the efficacy of mammograms for younger women is an open question. “The debate is worth following closely,” concluded the editor of the journal, “because women are deciding about breast cancer screening, and it’s our role to keep them informed as best we can.” Yet it is worth remembering that “mammography screening may lead to an overdiagnosis of breast cancer, that is, the detection of a tumor that would not have become clinically detectable in the patient’s lifetime.” – from the book “What If Medicine Disappeared” by Gerald E Markle.

    Cancer industry runs on scientific quackery and sleazy fear-based sales tactics to recruit patients
    This all confirms what I’ve said over and over again as a consumer health advocate: The cancer industry uses scare tactics that smack of “medical terrorism” to recruit frightened women and men into unnecessary — but highly profitable — cancer “treatments” that benefit no one other than the cancer industry quacks (oncologists).

    As first published in Natural News:

    The report drops a few major bombshells on the way that many cancers are diagnosed. Breast cancer, for instance, is sometimes not breast cancer at all but rather a benign condition such as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). However, untold millions of women with DCIS have been misdiagnosed as having breast cancer, and subsequently treated for a condition that likely never would have caused them any health problems. And similarly in men, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), a type of premalignant precursor to cancer, is commonly mistreated as if it was actual cancer.

    read more.

RobertAtkins-Many_Cures_for_Cancer_but_systematically_Suppressed

end

October 10, 2015 - Posted by | Medicine & Health, Social Trends | , , , , ,

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: