Socio-Economics History Blog

Socio-Economics & History Commentary

The FedRes’ Engineered Collapse!

September 15, 2012 Posted by | Economics, GeoPolitics, Social Trends | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The FedRes’ Engineered Collapse!

World War III: The Unthinkable Cost of Preserving The Petrodollar!

  • The Illuminists know that the petrodollar is under attack. They know that the USD will collapse. This is part of their plan for the enslavement of America to their Luciferian New World Order. What they want to maintain is their global currency hegemony. Their plan calls for a global currency meltdown (including the collapse of the USD) to usher in their One World Currency backed by gold ie. a New Monetary Hegemony! The petrodollar is scheduled for destruction to be replaced with another even more odious currency.
  • Pastor Lindsey Williams have recently stated that the petrodollar is dead. China has announced the trading of oil in Chinese Yuan and any country which wants to buy oil in Chinese Yuan can do so! Implied is that the Chinese are launching an alternative to the Anglo-American-Zionist western Illuminati owned SWIFT system. These actions are a direct assault on the western Illuminati’s global monetary hegemony. In the eyes of these snakes: it means war! Not just with Iran but Russia/China too! Quite obviously, this is World War 3!

    World War III: The Unthinkable Cost of Preserving the Petrodollar! 
    by CrisisHQ.com 
    As noted by many of our readers, one of the key topics omitted from our article on the inevitability of economic collapse, was the petrodollar system. Due to it’s significance, we felt that this subject deserves it’s own article. If you have never heard of the petrodollar, don’t be surprised. There’s a good reason for this. No major news network will dare touch this subject, because if this information was ever to become public knowledge, politicians would find it next to impossible to convince American people to support any more wars. Public approval of wars is only possible as long as people remain ignorant of the primary driving force behind our foreign policy. The reason you haven’t heard of the petrodollar system is because our government wants you to think that we start wars to spread democracy.

     However, if you want to distinguish truth from propaganda, if you want to know the real reasons behind the global conflicts in our recent history, you must first learn about the petrodollar system. Without this crucial piece of info, you will have a hard time understanding what really happened in Libya, what’s happening in Syria right now and what’s going to happen in Iran next.

    Why did NATO and the U.S. aid Libyan “rebels” in killing Gaddafi? Why was our government willing to support and arm the same terrorists that would later turn on our embassy and murder Libya ambassador Chris Stevens? Why was killing Gaddafi so absolutely imperative?

    Why are we now doing the same thing in Syria? Why are U.S. operatives currently on the ground in Syria aiding Al Qaeda to topple Assad? Why are we willing to work along side known terrorists just to destabilize Syria and overthrow the regime there?

    Why are we willing to risk World War 3 by attacking Iran, a key Russian and Chinese ally? Pakistan and North Korea already possess a nuclear stockpile, but Iran is years away from developing a nuclear weapon. Iran has no military capability to target the U.S. and it has not attacked another country since 1798. Yet, the media is trying to convince us that we are weeks away from Ahmedinajad unleashing his non-existent weapons of mass destruction. Sound a little familiar? Have we heard this before, maybe?

    So what is the petrodollar system and why is it so important? Why is the United States willing to risk a new world war just to maintain the hegemony of the petrodollar? To get a proper perspective we need to start with a quick historical background:

    read more!

end

September 15, 2012 Posted by | Economics, GeoPolitics | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Bill Murphy: Bullion Bank Run Imminent??

September 15, 2012 Posted by | Economics | , , , , , , | Comments Off on Bill Murphy: Bullion Bank Run Imminent??

Retired Diplomats and Military Officers Warn That Iran Strike Could Lead To Wider War!

  • Emphasis mine:

    Retired Diplomats and Military Officers Warn That Iran Strike Could Lead To Wider War! 
    by http://larouchepac.com/ 
    A very institutional grouping of 35 former U.S. military, diplomatic, and intelligence officials warned Thursday that U.S. military strikes on Iran could set back Iran’s nuclear program by about four years, but that the Iranians probably would manage to retaliate, directly and through surrogates, in ways that risked igniting all-out war in the Middle East.

    The report, issued by the “Iran Project,” was presented yesterday by a panel discussion at the Wilson Center, featuring veteran U.S. Ambassador Thomas Pickering, Dr. James Walsh from MIT (a close collaborator with Pickering on Iran back-channel discussions), and Lt. Gen. Frank Kearney, formerly the deputy commander of the U.S. Special Operations Command. Their starting point is that the U.S. Director of National Intelligence has determined that the Iranians have not made the decision to develop a nuclear weapon, and that therefore, there is no need for a rush to judgment. They also pointed to the well-known “unintended consequences” of military action, i.e., increasing fragility in the region, loss of the international coalition now pushing for sanctions, greater regional and globality instability, and a rallying of the Iranian populace around the regime.

    In order to achieve regime change, the report says, “the occupation of Iran would require a commitment of resources and personnel greater than what the U.S. has expended over the past 10 years in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars combined.” Warning of a wider war, the report also states: “A dynamic of escalation, action, and counteraction could produce serious unintended consequences that would significantly increase all of these costs and lead, potentially, to all-out regional war.”

    Former Ambassador William Luers, in introducing the panel, said the Iran Project began about ten years ago, in order to pursue back-channel discussions between the U.S. and Iran. (Their best-known action was a 2008 proposal for an international enrichment facility to be operated on Iranian soil.) Luers said that those involved are “people who care for their country, care about our national security, and who don’t want us to blow it.” He said the major new dimension has been bringing in additional people, especially retired military officers, who “are concerned about the consequences of not thinking through what might happen if we were to use military force.”

    Signatories to the report also include: former Central Intelligence Agency Deputy Director Paul Pillar, and former U.S. Central Command commanders Anthony Zinni and William Fallon. Others included Chuck Hagel, Sam Nunn, Lee Hamilton, Richard Armitage, Brent Scowcroft, Leslie Gelb, Anne-Marie Slaughter, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Joe Sestak, Lawrence Wilkerson, and Paul Volcker.

    After the initial presentations, the first question was asked by Matt Ogden of EIR, who praised their efforts, and then pointed to Rep. Walter Jones’s HCR 107, which, Ogden said, states that if the President launches a new war without Congressional authorization, he will be impeached. Ogden also asked about Gen. Dempsey’s warnings in London about Syria, and pointed to the likelihood that any military intervention would put us into a confrontation with Russia and China.

    Walsh punted on the war powers issue, saying that was something that Congress and the White House had to work out. Gen. Kearney praised Dempsey as “very well informed,” implying that his warnings should be taken very seriously. Neither wanted to discuss Syria, noting that their report was limited to the Iran situation.

end

September 15, 2012 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Retired Diplomats and Military Officers Warn That Iran Strike Could Lead To Wider War!

Anti-Islam Powers Seek Clash of Religions!

September 15, 2012 Posted by | GeoPolitics, Social Trends | , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Anti-Islam Powers Seek Clash of Religions!

The Sources of The Euro Crisis And The EU Superstate with Godfrey Bloom!

September 15, 2012 Posted by | Economics, GeoPolitics | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Sources of The Euro Crisis And The EU Superstate with Godfrey Bloom!

Marc Faber on Hedging The Bernanke Put And QE3 with Gold, Land And Equities!

September 15, 2012 Posted by | Economics | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Marc Faber on Hedging The Bernanke Put And QE3 with Gold, Land And Equities!

Deficit Spending And The “Coercion-Backed Greenback” with Edward Harrison!

September 15, 2012 Posted by | Economics | , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Deficit Spending And The “Coercion-Backed Greenback” with Edward Harrison!

Iran Attack Could Spark Caucasus War And Economic Trouble!

  • Iran Attack Could Spark Caucasus War and Economic Trouble! 
    by , http://antiwar.com/ 
    Russia’s Kavkaz-2012 strategic military training exercise later this month in the North Caucasus region may portend economic problems for the West. This is because the exercise is strategically linked to Russian expectations that Iran will be destabilized by the end of this year. If Iran is destabilized, Russia will uphold its obligations to Armenia under the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO). Russia could cut a military corridor through the center of Georgia, taking control of all oil and gas lines leading westward from the rich fields of the Caspian Sea. If this is combined with fighting in the Persian Gulf, energy prices may spike.

    While some Russian training exercises have preceded major combat operations (Chechnya 1999, Georgia 2008), they are routinely conducted in order to test ongoing reforms. Kavkaz-2012 is the first major exercise to be held in Russia’s Southern Military District since December 2010, when Russia introduced fundamental changes to its Ministry of Defense and joint strategic commands. Georgian officials are protesting that the exercise is intended to influence their parliamentary elections on Oct. 1. Less than a month after Kavkaz-2008, Russian troops fought a five-day war in Georgia. Russia recognized the independence of two Georgian breakaway regions, Abkhazia and South Ossetia, immediately after that August 2008 war.

    Russian officials insist that Kavkaz-2012 is a routine exercise, unrelated to events in other countries. They emphasize that the exercise will occur entirely on Russian territory and that they deliberately excluded units from Russian military bases in South Ossetia, Abkhazia, and Armenia. Armenia is a member of the CSTO along with Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, and Tajikistan. In Armenia, from Sept. 3-8, the CSTO will hold its own Rapid Reaction exercise dubbed “Interaction-2012.”

    According to Col.-Gen. Alexander Postnikov, deputy chief of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, Interaction-2012 is entirely separate from Kavkaz-2012, despite the fact that they are being held barely a week apart on opposite sides of Georgia. During Interaction-2012, representatives from the International Committee of the Red Cross will participate in a CSTO exercise for the first time. According to Postnikov, their role will be to “work out issues related to humanitarian assistance in areas where, according to the plan of exercise, a conflict situation will appear.”

    Russian officials anticipate that Iran’s nuclear program will be attacked by Israel or the United States prior to the end of 2012. Last winter, Russia evacuated civilians from its 102nd military base near the Turkish border in Armenia. Because it has poor relations with Turkey, Azerbaijan, and Georgia, Armenia depends upon Iran for energy and other basic supplies. Since Russia’s 2008 war with Georgia, Russia has supplied its 102nd base by air.

    A sustained Israeli or American attack will lead to serious instability south of Armenia’s border. Armenian supplies likely will be cut, and Armenia may see an influx of refugees. Russian military officials doubt that a swift Israeli strike can eliminate Iran’s nuclear facilities.

    An attack on Iran probably will be followed by provocations in areas disputed by Armenia and Azerbaijan. Since the early 1990s, the two countries have been engaged in a “frozen conflict” in the Nagorno-Karabakh region. The Azerbaijani government is increasingly aligned with both Israel and the United States, apprehensive about Moscow, and covetous of traditional Azeri territory in northern Iran along with Armenian-controlled territory to the west.

    read more!

end

September 15, 2012 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Iran Attack Could Spark Caucasus War And Economic Trouble!

State Terror: Official Israeli Policy!

  • State Terror: Official Israeli Policy! 
    by Stephen Lendman, http://sjlendman.blogspot.com/
    Israeli state terror targets Palestinians ruthlessly. Incidents include crimes of war, against humanity and genocide, land theft, institutionalized racism, oppression, intimidation, militarized occupation, and contempt for all rule of law principles and democratic values.

    Political prisoner Ahmad Saadat is right saying “Zionist war criminals are the ones who must be prosecuted.” More on his day in court below.

    He’s General Secretary of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), a member of the Palestinian Legislative Council, and a recognized and admired national leader. In 2002, he was sentenced to 30 years in prison for a range of “security related” political offenses.

    None have legitimacy. No legitimate court would recognize them. They include membership is a so-called forbidden organization, various alleged security related offenses, and “incitement” for condemning Israel’s murder of his predecessor, Abu Ali Mustafa.

    On August 27, 2001, two (Boeing produced) Israeli attack helicopters fired rockets at his Ramallah office and assassinated him. Over 50,000 mourners attended his funeral. The PFLP renamed their armed wing the Abu Ali Mustafa Brigades.

    He believed legitimate resistance includes armed struggle. Asked about risks he and others took, he said:

    “We all are targeted as soon as we begin to be mobilized. We do our best to avoid their guns, but we are living under the brutal Zionist occupation of our lands, and its army is only a few meters from us. Of course we must be cautious, but we have work to do, and nothing will stop us.”

    He, Saadat, Ghassan Kanafani, PFLP founder George Habash, and countless less well known freedom fighters never gave an inch in struggling for right over wrong. Nor do current PFLP leaders and other like-minded Palestinians.

    Saadat and other resistance leaders are targeted for their prominence. In Saadat’s case, it’s also for belong to a so-called prohibited organization.

    PFLP was founded on December 11, 1967. It courageously resists Israeli oppression. It seeks long denied liberation. It accuses Israel of “brutal aggression against our people – murder, destruction, assassination, house demolitions, the uprooting of trees, land expropriation, settlement expansion, the continued construction of the Apartheid Wall, a suffocating political and economic siege, torture, and massive oppression.”

    read more!
  • “Mr. Benjamin Freedman, a Jewish industrialist born in New York, wrote in the Economic Council Letter published there of October 15 1947: “These Eastern European Jews have neither a racial nor a historic connection with Palestine. Their ancestors were not inhabitants of the Promised Land. They are the direct descendants of the people of the Khazar Kingdom. The Khazars were a non-Semitic, Turko-Mongolian tribe.” Mr. Freedman was challenged, unwisely, by a Zionist objector; he invited his challenger to go with him to the Jewish room of the New York Public Library. There they could together examine the Jewish Encyclopedia volume I pp. 1-12, and the published works of Graetz, Dubnow, Friedlander, Raisin and many other noted Jewish historians, which, as well as other non-Jewish authorities, “establish the fact beyond all possible doubt”.’
    ~ Somewhere South of Suez (1950) pp349-350.”

Revelation 2:9 – …. and I know the blasphemy of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.

“ … it turns out the creation of Israel had not, after all, been a haphazard fight in which the Arabs fled their homes at the directives of their own leaders, but it had been an unprovoked, systematic campaign of ethnic cleansing by the Jewish militia involving massacres, terrorism and the wholesale looting of an entire nation.” from 4:22 onwards

end

September 15, 2012 Posted by | GeoPolitics, Social Trends | , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

9/11 Mastermind Osama bin Laden: America’s Anti-Soviet “Peace Warrior” And CIA “Intelligence Asset”!

  • 9/11 Mastermind Osama bin Laden: America’s Anti-Soviet “Peace Warrior” and CIA “Intelligence Asset”! 
    by Professor Michel Chossudovsky, theintelhub.com 
    “On September 11, 2012, let us not only renew our efforts to expose the truth, but also take our awareness a step further to understand that the wars launched since that fateful autumn day in 2001 – in the bitterly ironic name of “justice” and supposedly to combat “terrorism” – continue to take lives of people across the world. These wars are based on lies and their costs are staggering.”

    The eleventh commemoration anniversary of 9/11 brings to the forefront the issue of 911 truth. The official story is that Al Qaeda, with the complicity of the Taliban government was behind the 9/11 attacks. Both George W Bush and Barack Obama claim that the late Osama bin Laden was the architect of 9/11, responsible for overseeing the 9/11 hijackers.

    And that is why, we are told, that America is waging a  “Global War on Terrorism” (GWOT)  under the Pentagon’s doctrine of  “preemptive warfare”. The Global War on Terrorism not only targets “non-State” terrorist entities including Al Qaeda, it is also directed against alleged “state sponsors” of terrorism.

    In this regard,  several Western countries including the US, Britain and Canada consider that Iran is supportive of the “Sunni jihadist terror network”, an absurd proposition.

    In December 2011, a  Manhattan court judgment (based on selected testimonies and fabricated evidence), accused the Islamic Republic of Iran of supporting the 9/11 Al Qaeda hijackers.

    The investigation into Tehran’s alleged role was launched in 2004, pursuant to a recommendation of the 9/11 Commission “regarding an apparent link between Iran, Hezbollah, and the 9/11 hijackers”.


    The 9/11 Commission’s recommendation was that the this “apparent link” required  “further investigation by the U.S. government.” (9/11 Commission Report , p. 241). (See Iran 911 Case).

    In the December 2011 court judgment (Havlish v. Iran)  “U.S. District Judge George B. Daniels ruled that Iran and Hezbollah materially and directly supported al Qaeda in the September 11, 2001 attacks and are legally responsible for damages to hundreds of family members of 9/11 victims who are plaintiffs in the case”. (See Michel Chossudovsky, the 9/11 Reader, Global Research, September 3, 2001)

    Who was Osama bin Laden, the Alleged mastermind of the 9/11 attacks?
    The US administration tacitly acknowledges that Osama bin Laden had been recruited by the CIA in the heyday of the Soviet-Afghan war. Osama bin Laden was the leader of Al Qaeda which was supported covertly by the CIA. 


    The Blowback:  The official version is that “we supported” Al Qaeda’s jihadist crusade against the Soviet Union. “It was for a good cause.:

    According to Washington’s narrative Osama bin Laden “turned against us”  in the wake of the Soviet-Afghan war, which broadly coincided with the end of the Cold War (1946-1989), .

    In intelligence parlance, “the blowback” refers to an “intelligence asset”  which goes against its sponsors, namely the CIA. In the immediate wake of the Cold War, bin Laden was said to have abandoned the jihad. He was portrayed with some hesitation as a “Peace Warrior”  involved in humanitarian undertakings.

    The byline of this post Cold War photograph of Osama bin Laden published by the Independent in 1993, describes Bin Laden as an “anti-Soviet warrior”  “on the road to peace”.

    read more!

“Al Qaeda is a creation of the US intelligence apparatus! It is extremely well documented ! Many of the terrorist attacks are in fact orchestrated by the US intelligence and military!” – Michel Chossudovsky, 7:40 onwards

end

September 15, 2012 Posted by | GeoPolitics, History | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on 9/11 Mastermind Osama bin Laden: America’s Anti-Soviet “Peace Warrior” And CIA “Intelligence Asset”!

President of Italian Supreme Court Calls for International Criminal Investigation into 9/11 Attacks!

  • President of Italian Supreme Court calls for international criminal investigation into 9/11 attacks
    by Madison Ruppert, Contributor Activist Post 
    The President of the Italian Supreme Court, Fernando Imposimato, has reportedly called for a criminal investigation into the tragic attacks on September 11, 2001 and even went as far as to draw connections between historical “false flag” incidents such as those organized by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in Italy as part of Operation Gladio (which some claim has reared its ugly head once more).

    In a quite vitriolic letterpublished by the Journal of 9/11 Studies, Imposimato pulls no punches, opening the letter with the searing statement,

    The 9/11 attacks were a global state terror operation permitted by the administration of the USA, which had foreknowledge of the operation yet remained intentionally unresponsive in order to make war against Afghanistan and Iraq.

    “To put it briefly, the 9/11 events were an instance of the strategy of tension enacted by political and economic powers in the USA to seek advantages for the oil and arms industries,” wrote Imposimato.

    Imposimato is no stranger to high-profile cases, having served on the Anti-Mafia Commission during three different administrations, investigating the assassination of Italian Prime Minister Aldo Moro along with the attempted assassination of Pope John Paul II.

    In calling the 9/11 attacks an instance of the strategy of tension, or strategia della tensione, Imposimato is linking them to the decades of brutal violence carried out by Western intelligence agencies and their agents throughout the Mediterranean.

    read more!


end

September 15, 2012 Posted by | GeoPolitics, History | , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on President of Italian Supreme Court Calls for International Criminal Investigation into 9/11 Attacks!

Bernanke Press Conference: ‘Counting All QE Programs, Fed Will Spend $85 Billion Per Month Not Just The $40 Billion Announced Today’!

  • I believe the amount of money printing is well over US$85B per month. I do not believe any foreign country is buying US treasuries in any huge quantity like before ie. the FedRes is covertly monetizing at least 70% of the US$1.4B deficit. I am saying The Bernank is lying when he says only US$85B/month. It is closer to US$40B (newly announced MBS monetization)+US$80+B= US$120+B/mth!
  • This is really about bailing out the banksters! It is about buying the worthless, toxic and mostly fraudulent MBS derivatives from Illuminist banks. The cost to the FedRes is ZERO since they create the money out of thin air. They simply type the amount needed into their computer system! What a SCAM!

    Bernanke Press Conference: ‘Counting All QE Programs, Fed Will Spend $85 Billion Per Month Not Just The $40 Billion Announced Today’ (VIDEO)!
    by http://dailybail.com/ 
    The new program, or QE3 as it is called, is $40 billion per month of MBS, but there’s another $45 billion of Treasury monetization that’s already taking place every month via Operation Twist, as well as the Fed’s ongoing reinvestment of proceeds from maturing mortgage and agency debt, bringing the total to a cool $85 billion every 30 days, or roughly $300 billion between now and Christmas.

    read more!

end

September 15, 2012 Posted by | Economics | , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Bernanke Press Conference: ‘Counting All QE Programs, Fed Will Spend $85 Billion Per Month Not Just The $40 Billion Announced Today’!

QE Infinity: FedRes Buying More Toxic Assets From Banks Will NOT Help Main Street !

  • QE Infinity: Fed Buying More Toxic Assets From Banks Will NOT Help Main Street
    by Eric Blair, Activist Post
    Ben Bernanke and the Federal Reserve announced an open-ended bailout for the banks yesterday by a new mechanism called QE Infinity where they plan to purchase $40 billion of toxic mortgage-backed securities per month “until further notice”.

    Shrouded in confusing language like “unlimited stimulus” or “quantitative easing”, this unprecedented move and rule change by the Fed was said to be warranted because employment remains weak even though they still maintain the false notion that “economic activity has continued to expand at a moderate pace in recent months.”

    As stated in the FMOC press release:

    If the outlook for the labor market does not improve substantially, the Committee will continue its purchases of agency mortgage-backed securities, undertake additional asset purchases, and employ its other policy tools as appropriate until such improvement is achieved in a context of price stability.

    Of course this move “to foster maximum employment and price stability” does nothing to directly help job creation, and will continue to hurt main street by inflating the price of everything purchased by dollars. Yet it will clearly reward the investor class who already own most of the dollar-based assets.

    The theory is that by removing toxic assets from the bank’s books they have more liquidity to offer more credit, or to purchase more government debt. Somehow this is supposed to trickle down and help improve unemployment, which real numbers show to be in the 20% range when all factors are considered.

    After a combined $2.3 trillion from QE1 ($1.7T) and QE2 ($600B), plus over $16 trillion is secret bailouts to recapitalize banks with absolutely no measurable improvement in the economy, how could any thinking person believe this policy will be beneficial?

    read more!

end

September 15, 2012 Posted by | Economics | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on QE Infinity: FedRes Buying More Toxic Assets From Banks Will NOT Help Main Street !

Sovereignty Evaporating: Europe’s Steady Slide Into Tyranny!

  • Sovereignty Evaporating: Europe’s Steady Slide Into Tyranny
    by Jurriaan Maessen, www.Infowars.com 
    On September 12th 2012 the Dutch people have convinced themselves they actually had something to choose from on election day. The current ruling party in the Netherlands was declared winner, it’s leader (a self-proclaimed “liberal” named Mark Rutte who attended the 2012 Bilderberg conference) recently shoveled some 4 billion euro into the pockets of European bankers, with an option of some 140 billion euro more, when the European Commission deems more cash-injections necessary.

    Meanwhile the little people were allowed their glorious day of self-deception in the voting booth. Some of the political parties on the ballot pretended opposition to EU supreme rule, others openly embraced it. I have watched leaders of all major parties in the Netherlands openly proclaim that losing national sovereignty- in some cases abolishing altogether- is really a good thing- and all scepticism to the rule of European technocratic commissioners must either be met with accusations of xenophobia, or horrific specters of doom must be sketched if there is no immediate compliance to EU dictates. As a Dutch citizen, it’s truly disheartening to witness these hordes of people voting themselves into oblivion, and doing so with a self-complementary smile- probably thinking they are actually voting for this or that party- while they are in fact tightening the chains that hold them bound to unelected commisszars.

    Therefore, the election results were not somewhat, but completely insignificant- a shameless dog and pony show designed by a transnational elite to keep the masses in a steady propaganda-slumber, while they happily vote themselves further into a technocratic construct that would put emperor Nero to shame. Whatever incidental party declares “victory” over the other shades of gray, it’s clear that the true winner sits behind a desk, laughing in his fist, knowing that slowly but surely, over the course of not years but decades, the peoples of sovereign nations are wrapping what’s left of their constitutions in a blue flag sprinkled with white stars. And in due time, this flag will be wrapped into an even bigger flag depicting the globe, signifying global government. In any case, here’s a picture of the real winner of elections held all throughout Europe, and he’s not even on the ballots!

    read more!

end

September 15, 2012 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Sovereignty Evaporating: Europe’s Steady Slide Into Tyranny!