Socio-Economics History Blog

Socio-Economics & History Commentary

Israel Will Commit Suicide By Attacking Iran (And Allow The Globalists To Pick Up The Pieces)!

World War 3 at the door steps?

  • Satanic World War 3 – The Greater Middle East War 
    The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the “agentur” of the “Illuminati” between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other.
  • The Illuminists are playing a rather complex game. Who is being played here? Who is being deceived here? Iran, US, EU or Zionist Israel? My belief is that Zionist ‘666’ Israel is being played and are the deceived useful idiots. They will be used in the coming war against the Muslim world and at the end of it will be destroyed. This nation which loves war so much is about to get their wish. The devil will use your weakness against you. The Zionists will fall into a trap of their own making!
  • If US and NATO get involved militarily directly, Russia and China will engage themselves in this Greater Middle East war immediately. It will become an unwinnable mutually assured destruction nuclear war. However, if Zionist Israel is the sole/main nation involved in this coming war without the direct involvement of the US and EU, I believe there is a good chance Russia and China will not get involve directly. US, EU and China, Russia will fight this war via proxies ie. Zionist Israel vs Muslim world.
  • After which it is anybody’ guess whether they will proceed with all out nuclear war. The Illuminist plan is to destroy/weaken all nation states such that they will not be able to resist the coming Luciferian New World Order, World Government.

    Israel Will Commit Suicide By Attacking Iran (And Allow The Globalists To Pick Up The Pieces) 
    by Saman Mohammadi, 
    …. In the last six months, tensions have risen between Israel and Iran. Israel has assassinated numerous Iranian nuclear scientists and Iranian military officials, including the founder of Iran’s missile program, Major General Hassan Moghaddam.

    So far, Iran has not retaliated against Israel’s repeated acts of aggression and terrorism. But the spirit of revenge is alive in Tehran. While it is hard to tell what kind of manifestation Iran’s spiritual anger will take, everyone realizes that a retaliation is in order and completely justified.

    Throughout Israel’s campaign of terror and provocations against Iran, the Obama administration has remained in the background, quietly minding its own business. Washington’s compliance towards Israel has puzzled and aggravated many people, including world leaders who believe the time has come to get tough with Israel. Anyone who is paying the least bit of attention to statements on Israel and Iran by U.S. government officials know they are contradictory and anti-reality.

    American author and journalist Mark Perry, who made serious waves in the Israel-Iran debate last month with his piece in Foreign Policy called, ‘False Flag,’ says that official U.S. government statements are written for a number of domestic and foreign audiences. So when Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told CBS’ Face The Nation last month that Iran is not building a nuclear bomb, he wanted to reassure Iranian leaders that things are under control in Washington and that the crazies are not totally guiding America’s Iran policy.

    As far as words go, the Obama administration has proven that it can pull off the high-wire act of balancing U.S. interests and Israel’s ambitions. But this is a deadly game that Washington is playing. President Obama is gambling with the lives of Americans and citizens around the world.

    Zbigniew Brzezinski, the former United States National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter, said that President Obama should make a public statement in which he warns Iran against raising tensions and guarantees that America will not attack Iran or allow any attack to take place. This move would isolate an already weakened Israel and force its lunatic leaders to reflect on its current terrorist strategy towards Iran and rethink Israel’s overall Middle East policy.

    Brzezinski offered his advice to President Obama and top administration officials on the Chris Matthews show on February 3, 2012. Here is the exchange between Matthews and Brzezinski:

    Matthews: Is there something that could be worse than Iran having a weapon. In other words, when you make the calculation on consequences, is there any way you would decide ‘Well, alright, we can live with a nuclear weapon in the hands of the Iranians’ because it’s better than what?

    Brzezinski: The answer is very simple: war. Because it’s very easy to start a war, it’s very difficult to end it on your own terms. And it tends to produce unforeseen consequences.

    Look, the Israelis have the so-called nuclear deterrent. We have an enormous nuclear deterrent. The notion that somehow or other the Iranians, who have existed for three thousand years, are going to commit public suicide the first moment they have a bomb is really ludicrous. Gary Sick, who is a major significant expert on Iran, has produced a list since 1994 of annual Israeli predictions that next year Iran will have the bomb. So I think we can take their predictions with a little bit of caution.

    Moreover, their public opinion is not first strike. The majority of American Jews are not first strike. . .I think we’re dealing here with a right-wing government with rather one-sided notions of what security is, and perhaps with a somewhat irresponsible attitude about the consequences of their actions for us. Because the Iranians, if attacked, are not going to retaliate effectively against Israel because they can not. They’ll retaliate against us because they’ll see us as the sponsors. So, our troops in Afghanistan will pay the price and our disengagement may become very difficult to pursue. We’ll have a mess in Iraq again. There could be difficulties in the Persian Gulf. The price of oil could go up. The global economy could be hurt. American taxpayers will pay five bucks per gallon. The consequences for us could be extremely serious.

    Matthews: But Dr. Brzezinski can Israel survive if it’s known by its own people it protects, perhaps future immigrants to Israel, that they’re going into a country that’s under a basically a firing zone from Iran, that any moment one of the Mullahs could decide to attack, maybe irrationally.

    Brzezinski: Look, we lived in that situation for several decades, with an enemy who could wipe out much of America in a few minutes. They don’t have the bomb yet. We’re negotiating with them. I think part of the Israelis’ concern is that we may make an arrangement with the Iranians that doesn’t humiliate them, and doesn’t force them to capitulate totally.

    Matthews: What’s in U.S. interest?
    Brzezinski: I think in the U.S. interest it is absolutely imperative that Israel be secure, but in a Middle East which is not at war. And we can accomplish that. We can first of all issue a public statement that any threat by Iran against any state in the Middle East will be viewed as a threat against us. That in itself would be a very major deterrent. And I think we can at the same time continue negotiating with Iranians perhaps about some arrangement in which they’ll continue their nuclear program but under effective international inspection. And some progress is moving in that direction.

    Matthews: How do you save their pride?
    Brzezinski: Well, by agreeing to them having a nuclear program.
    Matthews: It’s not weaponized?
    Brzezinski: It’s not weaponized. The enrichment is not up to a certain level that really represents a danger.
    Matthews: Okay, what does Israel get out of that deal? Do they get a year or two or three years of safety?
    Brzezinski: Look, if they have a guarantee from the United States they have as much safety as Western Europe, or as Japan, or as South Korea. I think we can do it. But we have to be forthright. And our president and secretary of defense also have to speak forthrightly about this and make it clear we do not want that war, it’s in nobody’s interest.

    If Brzezinski’s narrative—that Israel is pulling and dragging America into a war with unpredictable consequences that it does not want—is correct and true then that makes Israel the clear villain in this global drama. So according to this narrative, America = the subservient dog in the house; and Israel = the rogue wild wolf on the frontier.

    But is this the reality, or is it clever CIA/Pentagon propaganda?
    The biggest question on the minds of the people of the world is not will a vilified and isolated Israel attack Iran, but, does Israel control Washington, or does Washington control Israel? And by Washington I mean the globalist new world order terrorists in the CIA and the Pentagon who were behind 9/11, and the assassination of JFK.

    … for the complete article click here!


February 13, 2012 - Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: