Socio-Economics History Blog

Socio-Economics & History Commentary

Steve Quayle And Tom Horn: Genetic Armageddon Part 2, Return of the Nephilim Giants Demigods, Transhumanism…29 June 2010

Vodpod videos no longer available.

end

August 3, 2010 Posted by | EndTimes, History, Social Trends | , , , , | 20 Comments

‘Proof’ That The Cheonan Was Sunk By North Korea Has Been Thoroughly Discredited !

  • The Illuminists are setting up the chess pieces for World War 3. This sinking of the South Korean warship Cheonan is simply building a false pretext for war. The western Illuminist owned MSM is promoting/selling the false reason: that North Korea was responsible, to lay the ground work for this coming war. They have attempted to sell the new Axis of Evil many times: North Korea, Iran, Myanmar, Venezuela… etc.
     
  • The real target of this operation is China. North Korea is of no threat to the western Illuminist financial and fiat currency hegemony. China is the rising power that can totally derail, disrupt and destroy the Illuminist central banking cartel. China alone can pull Asia along and go it alone without the western world. I am quite sure most of Latin America prefer the lead of China than America. It is obvious to South Americans that war is brewing, the terrifying American military monster is already at the doorsteps.
     
  • Most people don’t understand that North Korea exists as it is because the Illuminists want it that way. They need North Korea as a bogeyman to keep South Korea and especially Japan in check. Every time the Japanese want to assert their independence (from American hegemony) the Illuminist stir up the North Korean bogeyman. Hatoyama caved in to America on the Okinawa military bases issue right after the Cheonan incident right? Why do the Illuminists need bases in South Korea and Japan? Clearly for the encirclement of China. I doubt it is for the sushi and kimchi!
     
    Shock wave and bubble: the untruth about the Cheonan ‘proof’ that the Cheonan was sunk by North Korea has been thoroughly discredited.
    Only a small coterie in the USA and South Korea know for sure what really happened to the South Korean warship. But, unreported in the Western media, the ‘proof’ that the Cheonan was sunk by North Korea has been thoroughly discredited.
     
    As is often the case following a negotiated outcome, both sides claimed victory. After the final text on the sinking of the South Korean corvette was agreed by the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council on 9th July, the Whitehouse issued a statement which asserted:
     
    Today’s UN Security Council Presidential statement condemns the attack by North Korea on the Cheonan and warns North Korea that the international community will not tolerate such aggressive behavior against the Republic of Korea. The unanimous statement, reflecting the shared view of the 5 members of the Six-Party Talks, constitutes an endorsement of the findings of the Joint Investigative Group that established North Korea’s responsibility for the attack.
     
    But the UNSC Presidential
    statement did no such thing. It did not condemn ‘the attack by North Korea’ or ‘warn North Korea’, because it did not name the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (North Korea) as the culprit. And it did not endorse the findings of the Joint Investigative Group which was appointed by the government of the Republic of Korea (South Korea). The wording of the statement on this matter was much more cautious:
     
    In view of the findings of the Joint Civilian-Military Investigation Group led by the ROK with the participation of five nations, which concluded that the DPRK was responsible for sinking the Cheonan, the Security Council expresses its deep concern.
     
    Following which, the UNSC statement added:
     
    The Security Council takes note of the responses from other relevant parties, including from the DPRK, which has stated that it had nothing to do with the incident…
     
    The Security Council welcomes the restraint shown by the ROK and stresses the importance of maintaining peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula and in northeast Asia as a whole.
     
    In contrast to the US government’s claims, the editors of the New York Times made no attempt to portray the position reached at the UNSC as any kind of success for United States diplomacy. Rather, the NYT‘s editorial on 9th July, entitled ‘Security Council Blinks’, ranted with frustration:
     
    ‘Lowest common denominator’ is too often the standard at the United Nations. Even then, the Security Council’s new statement on the sinking of the South Korean warship Cheonan is absurdly, dangerously lame…
     
    Forty-six South Korean sailors died last March when the warship sank in disputed waters. Seoul quickly accused North Korea of torpedoing the ship but showed admirable restraint, inviting in an international team to investigate. The team did its work and agreed that a North Korean ship was responsible. South Korea produced a torpedo propeller with North Korean markings.
     
    Contrary to the assertion by the New York Times editorial writers, it is not the case that, following the sinking, the ROK ‘quickly accused North Korea of torpedoing the ship’. Although South Korea’s current right wing government is pro-US and very hostile to the DPRK, the initial ROK official position was that it was unlikely that North Korea was involved- the reason being that no evidence could be obtained to implicate the DPRK, and the information that was available was in contradiction to the theory that North Korean forces had sunk the warship. As the South Korean newspaper The Hankyoreh
    reported on 1st April:
     
    In the immediate wake of the incident, the Cheong Wa Dae (the presidential office in South Korea or Blue House) and the military detailed the chance of North Korean involvement as slight. Following a security-related ministerial meeting presided over by President Lee Myung-bak just after the accident took place on Friday night, Cheong Wa Dae spokesman Kim Eun-hye was circumspect, saying, “At present, we are not clear about the question of a North Korean connection.” In a National Assembly briefing Saturday, Lee Ki-sik, head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff intelligence operations office, said, “No North Korean warships have been detected, and there is no possibility of their approaching the waters where the accident took place.” Additionally, the military has stressed on multiple occasions that it has picked up no “unusual trends” in North Korean military movements while monitoring…
     
    As recently as Tuesday, Cheong Wa Dae spokesman Park Sun-kyu said, “As of now, nothing has emerged indicating that North Korea was involved.”
     
    Even by April 20th, as the British Daily Mail newspaper
    acknowleged:
     
    Seoul has not openly blamed Pyongyang for the sinking of the Cheonan, one of South Korea’s worst naval disasters.

     
    Investigation or cover up?

    As for the action of the ROK authorities in, as claimed by the New York Times and other Western media outlets, “inviting in an international team to investigate”, this assertion is highly misleading. In fact the Joint Civilian-Military Investigation Group (JIG) was appointed by the South Korean government, and apart from a very small number of foreign participants was drawn overwhelmingly from the South Korean military and defence establishment. As a footnote to an
    article in the Asia-Pacific Journal records:
     
    Despite its name – the Joint Civilian-Military Investigation Group – the absolute majority of its members, 65 out of 74, work for the [South Korean] Ministry of National Defense or MND-related think tanks and institutes. One of its two heads, Pak Chǒng-I, was a three star general at the time of the investigation, and was subsequently promoted to a four star status after the release of the report.
     
    The foreign participants in the JIG were selected from Western countries- the USA, Britain, Canada, and Australia, with the partial inclusion of Sweden. Although its description as an ‘international team’ conveys the implication of objectivity and impartiality, it included no Russians or Chinese, nor even any French or Germans.
     
    On May 6th, Reuters reported the
    claim of a senior South Korean government official that the investigators had decided that the Cheonan had been sunk by a torpedo- the evidence for this was the discovery of traces of materials consistent with a German-made torpedo in the wreckage of the ship:
     
    … to continue reading click here!

end

August 3, 2010 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , | 3 Comments

FedRes’ Bullard Beats Drum For QE2!

August 3, 2010 Posted by | Economics | , , , , | Comments Off on FedRes’ Bullard Beats Drum For QE2!

Leaders & Celebrities: ‘I Love You’ or ‘I Love Satan’ ?

Vodpod videos no longer available.

end

August 3, 2010 Posted by | EndTimes, Social Trends | , | 7 Comments

Israeli Historian Teddy Katz: The Founding Myths of Zionist Israel. The Truth: Genocide And Ethnic Cleansing! Tantura Massacre!

Vodpod videos no longer available.

August 3, 2010 Posted by | GeoPolitics, History | , , , , , | 2 Comments

Flu Jab Linked To Fits In Under Fives! A Tenfold Increase In Fits!

  • Do you believe the Big Pharma propaganda about vaccines? Do you believe the FDA? Who owns the FDA? Vaccines are the cause of many diseases and deaths. This statement may seem extreme until you understand the history of medicine in the west. See: 
     
    Vaccine-Induced Disease Epidemic Outbreaks: The Engineering of ‘Pandemics’
    Murder By Injection: The Story Of The Medical Conspiracy Against America 
    Medical Cartel & Cancer
    FlashBack: UNICEF Nigerian Polio Vaccine Contaminated with Sterilizing Agents Scientist Finds
    1976 Swine Flu Vaccination Propaganda and The Side Effects
    Dr. Russell Blaylock on 1976 Swine Flu and Current Outbreak
    Dr. Russell Blaylock: Vaccine May Be More Dangerous Than Swine Flu
    Ron Paul: Be Careful of the Rush into the Swine Flu Vaccine. 1976 Swine Flu Vaccine Killed People!
    Swine Flu Jab Link to Killer Nerve Disease: Leaked Letter Reveals Concern of Neurologists over 25 Deaths in America.
      
  • Big Pharma cartel is once again pushing the ‘new’ seasonal flu vaccine. My suggestion is: skip all flu vaccines, you don’t need them. It is based on dubious science at best. Vaccines have the ‘minor’ side effects of death and paralysis! Why do that to your children.
     
    Flu jab linked to fits in under fives: officials
    GPs have been told not to use a particular flu jab on 110,000 children under five after it was linked with a tenfold increase in fits, it can be revealed.
      
    Doctors should stock alternative vaccines for under fives who are due to have the seasonal flu vaccine this winter, a letter from the head of immunisation at the Department of Health has said. The action is being taken as rate of convulsions caused by high fever among children in Australia given the jab was ten times higher than normal.
      
    Up to one in 100 children given the jab, made in Australia by CSL and marketed in the UK by Pfizer, suffered febrile convulsions in the following hours and days. It is not known what is causing the problem and no other flu vaccines have been linked to an increased risk of fits. Adults given the vaccine do not appear to have been affected.
     
    Children under five are only routinely vaccinated against seasonal flu if they are in designated ‘risk groups’ because they have chronic asthma, have been admitted to hospital with a respiratory infection previously or have other long-term conditions which means they would be particularly badly affected if they caught flu.
     
    Seasonal flu vaccines contain three strains which have been identified by the World Health Organisation as the most common in circulation that year. This year the vaccines contain the pandemic strain H1N1. The letter to all GPs from Prof David Salisbury, said: “Epidemiological information from Australia indicates that there has been a higher than expected increase in febrile convulsions in children related to the use of Fluvax (manufactured by CSL).
     
    “This is the same product that will be marketed in the UK by Pfizer as Enzira and generic influenza vaccine for the 2010/11 influenza vaccination season. “Evidence from Australia suggests a rate of febrile convulsions of about one per 100 for children who were vaccinated with Fluvax. This increased risk appears to be a product specific reaction and evidence from Australia of vaccination with other products has so far not indicated a similar level of risk.
     
    “It is important that children over six months of age who are in clinical risk groups receive influenza vaccination. Given the availability of other influenza vaccine products, you should avoid offering Enzira or CSL Biotherapies generic influenza vaccine marketed by Pfizer to children aged under five years.” He added that the medicines regulator will be monitoring the situation.
     
    Febrile convulsions affect around one in 20 children and are normally caused by an infection. The body reacts to the high fever with the child losing consciousness and their legs and arms jerk. They may go pale or turn blue briefly and after a few minutes the shaking normally stops. The attacks can be very frightening for parents and children are usually admitted to hospital after the first convulsion to establish the cause. Some children are particularly prone to them but they are not normally dangerous.

end

August 3, 2010 Posted by | Medicine & Health | | 1 Comment

Fears Mount on Food Price Impact of Russian Drought!

Vodpod videos no longer available.

  • This Russian drought problem needs attention. Is this the final straw, the start of famine in the industrialised countries? We will know soon. Third world countries have already felt the impact of higher prices since the beginning of the year. Many are eating less or eating worse ie giving up meat and eating cheaper grains.
     
  • I am highly skeptical about reported grains reserves. See: 11,700 tonnes of food grains rot in FCI godowns across India, Food grains rot in FCI godowns across India. Most governments will over report grain stock figures to depress prices.
     
    Fears mount on food price impact of Russian drought
    The UK is warning that Russia’s drought could cause a double-digit percentage rise in food prices before Christmas. Russia is a major food exporter, but record temperatures this summer are expected to halve exports. There are also fears the government could start an export ban to protect domestic supplies.
     
    Some experts say the food price inflation – non goods like wheat, dairy and meat – is “scary” and could push the country into another recession.
     
    But the president of the Russian Grain Union, Arkady Zlachevsky believes, that exports will not suffer much under the current conditions and says there is hope that Siberian crops will help improve the total output.
     
    “The most pessimistic export forecast is 11 million tones. No one has a more pessimistic outlook but we think that exports will be in a region of 14 to 15 million tons. However, it will depend on a level of reserves we have. We estimate the total output levels to be around 75 to 76 million tons on average. The European region of Russia has already lost all it can but this number could increase if we have favorable weather conditions in Siberia.”
     
    Russia has already agreed to sell 180 thousand tones of wheat to Egypt. The African state, the world’s largest importer, shunned a similar offer from the United States, and grain prices have shot up on the news. The head of Russian grain union believes the prices are overheated.
     
    “The fundamental factors do not support current grain prices. Last week we reached $240 per ton, but this price is quite groundless. According to the latest forecast of the Global grain council, grain reserves will reach 192 million tons this year, compared to last year’s record volume of 197 million tons. Is that a really big difference if the decrease is just 5 million tones? But the average price has jumped from $180 to $240.”

end

August 3, 2010 Posted by | Economics, Medicine & Health, Social Trends | | 1 Comment

Rabbi Weiss: Jews & Muslims Lived Peacefully!

end

August 3, 2010 Posted by | GeoPolitics, History | , , , | Comments Off on Rabbi Weiss: Jews & Muslims Lived Peacefully!