Socio-Economics History Blog

Socio-Economics & History Commentary

Glen Beck on Cap and Trade Breakdown !

  • The Illuminati elite intend to take down America. Cap and Trade is simply stealing money from the sheeple to feed the banksters. What this Satanic ruling class wants is a master-slave re-organization of the world. This is the drive to a global fascist police state, world government. Major economies will be crippled by this bankster scam.
     
  • Carbon dioxide is good for the planet. Plants need it. The agriculture industry will be more productive with increase CO2 emission. The fact of the matter is this: pre-history earth had tropical and sub tropical weather. This is because of the water vapour blanket covering the entire globe. The fossil records clearly show millions more plant species and animal life forms. Greenland was a green island in the past. See also:
      
    In 1969, Rockefeller Official Said US Would Be De-industrialized
    Cap and Trade is a Scam! It is a Global Tax for World Government!

end

December 9, 2009 Posted by | Economics | , , , , , | 1 Comment

Lord Monckton Reveals Scientific Fraud at Copenhagen!

Part   5  

December 9, 2009 Posted by | Science & Technology, Social Trends | , | 4 Comments

Obama’s Secret: Only 100 Al Qaeda Now in Afghanistan!

Obama the Liar in Chief. Source: ABC

  • Why is Obama sending 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan? The War on Terror is a fraud! It is a beautiful lie to get the American sheeple to accept wars and more wars for profits, for the New World Order global conquest. The real reason for more troops is Iran. Yes, war with Iran is planned. The question is when and not whether.
     
  • Obama, the Nobel Peace Prize winner, is merely a lying salesman puppet of the hidden Illuminati ruling cabal. Didn’t he say he is going to end the wars and bring the troops home during campaigning? Republicans or Democrats, there is no difference. Both parties are owned by the shadow Satanic rulers. Don’t be taken for a ride. Al Qaeda is a CIA asset. ABC News reports:
     
    With New Surge, One Thousand U.S. Soldiers and $300 Million for Every One al Qaeda Fighter
     
    As he justified sending 30,000 more
    troops to Afghanistan at a cost of $30 billion a year, President Barack Obama’s description Tuesday of the al Qaeda “cancer” in that country left out one key fact: U.S. intelligence officials have concluded there are only about 100 al Qaeda fighters in the entire country.
      
    A senior U.S. intelligence official told ABCNews.com the approximate estimate of 100 al Qaeda members left in Afghanistan reflects the conclusion of American intelligence agencies and the
    Defense Department. The relatively small number was part of the intelligence passed on to the White House as President Obama conducted his deliberations.
     
    President Obama made only a vague reference to the size of the al Qaeda presence in his speech at West Point, when he said, “al Qaeda has not reemerged in Afghanistan in the same number as before
    9/11, but they retain their safe havens along the border.”
     
    A spokesperson at the White House’s National Security Council, Chris Hensman, said he could not comment on intelligence matters. Obama’s National Security Adviser, Gen. James Jones, put the number at “fewer than a hundred” in an October interview with
    CNN.
     
    Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., referred to the number at a Senate Foreign Relations Committee in October, saying “intelligence says about a hundred al Qaeda in Afghanistan.” As the President acknowledged, al Qaeda now operates from Pakistan where U.S. troops are prohibited from operating. “We’re in Afghanistan to prevent a cancer from once again spreading through that country,” he said.
       
    Intelligence officials estimate there are several hundred al Qaeda fighters just across the border in Pakistan. An Obama administration official said the additional troops were needed in Afghanistan to “sandwich” al Qaeda between Pakistan and Afghanistan and prevent them from re-establishing a safe haven in Afghanistan.
     
    “Pakistan has been stepping up its efforts,” the official said. “So the real question is will Pakistan do enough,” said former White House counter-terrorism official Richard Clarke, an ABC News consultant.
     
    “What if they take all the money we given them but don’t really follow through? What the strategy then?” said Clarke. With 100,000 troops in Afghanistan at an estimated yearly cost of $30 billion, it means that for every one al Qaeda fighter, the U.S. will commit 1,000 troops and $300 million a year.

end

December 9, 2009 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , | 2 Comments

Jews Against Zionism!

Revelation 2:9 - .... and I know the blasphemy of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.

  • Zionism is like cancer in human society. Its underpinnings are racism and hatred. I am glad that more and more Jews are recognizing it for what it is: The Enemy of the Jewish people! Zionist leaders have sold out Jews in the past and are continuing to do so. In my opinion, in its darkest heartbeats, is Satanism. The plan is to re-gather the Jewish people to the holy land and kill them. No ideology based on racism, ethnic cleansing and hatred can be of God. God does not teach me to hate Jews or Palestinians. As Jesus Christ says:
      
    Matthew 5:43-45 (New King James Version)
    Love Your Enemies
    43 “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor[a] and hate your enemy.’ 44 But I say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you,[b] 45 that you may be sons of your Father in heaven; for He makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust.
     
  • Stephen Lendman writes:
     
    They’re numerous, outspoken, and range from secular to orthodox to one group calling itself “True Torah Jews Against Zionism.”  They believe that “traditional” Jews don’t support Zionism, an ideology they call “contrary to Jewish law and beliefs and the teachings of the Holy Torah.” They say Zionism: 
     
    — advocates “a political and military end to the Jewish exile;” 
    — fosters “pseudo-Judaism” based on secular nationalism; 
    — coercively seeks “armed materialism” in place of “a Divine and Torah centered understanding;” 
    — endangers all Jews worldwide; 
    — wants to disassociate Jews and traditional Judaism from ideological Zionism; and 
    — calls Israel a “Zionist State,” not a Jewish one. 
     
    They: 
     
    — cite their concern for “peace and safety of all people throughout the world including those living in the Zionist state” and in Occupied Palestine; 
    — say from ancient times until 100 years ago, Jews and Arabs lived in peace and friendship until Zionism changed the relationship; 
    — believe Zionists abandoned the Torah and traditional Judaism, demanded political sovereignty over the Holy Land, and aroused anger in the Arab world; and 
    — Torah Jewry doesn’t recognize or support a Zionist state; nor do they represent world Jews; even the name “Israel” is a “forgery,” they believe, because the Torah forbids violence in the words of the prophet Isaiah who said: 
     
    “And they will beat their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks. No nation will lift its sword against any other, nor will they learn warfare anymore.” 
     
    Torah Jewry says that believing Zionism protects Jews is “probably the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the Jewish People” and accuses Zionists of fostering global anti-Semitism. “Indeed, hatred of Jews and Jewish suffering is the oxygen of the Zionist movement, and from the very beginning has been (used) to deliberately incite hatred to justify the existence of the Zionist state – this is, of course, Machiavellianism raised to the highest order.” 
     
    Zionist founder Theodor Herzl (1860 – 1904) said: 
     
    “It is essential that the suffering of Jews….becomes worse….this will assist in (the) realization of our plans….I have an excellent idea….I shall induce anti-semites to liquidate Jewish wealth….The anti-semites will assist us thereby in that they will strengthen the persecution and oppression of Jews. The anti-semites shall be our best friends.” 
     
    In 1920, other Zionists voiced similar ideas, including Nahum Goldmann, later president of the World Zionist Organization and World Jewish Congress head. Israel’s first president, Chaim Weizman, said Germany had too many Jews. In 1921, Jacob Klatzkin called for German Jews to undermine Jewish communities as a way to acquire a future state. 
     
    In 1963, Moshe Sharett (Israel’s second prime minister from 1953 – 1955) told the 38th Scandinavian Youth Federation Annual Congress that Jewish freedom imperiled Zionism. Delegates at the 26th World Zionist Congress were told that easing US anti-Semitism and freedom endangered Jews. 
     
    Torah Jewry disagrees in affirming its desire to live in peace with their Arab and Palestinian neighbors and abide by sacred commandments “with a perfect heart and to delight in the radiance of the sanctity of the Land.” 
     
    They believe: “Zionists have no right of any sovereignty over even one inch of the Holy Land. They do not represent the Jewish people in any way whatsoever. They have no right to speak in the name of the Jewish people.” Their ideology is “antithetical to Jewish law,” and because they don’t behave like Jews, “they desecrate the sanctity of the land.” They feel that when Israel is recognized as a Zionist, not a Jewish, state, “Jews worldwide will be able to live in peace” and do it alongside Arabs in the Middle East. 
     
    “The Hidden History of Zionism” 
    In his 1988 book, Ralph Schoenman explained four Zionist myths: 
     
    — the notion of “A land without people for a people without a land” to promote the fiction that an empty Palestine was there for the taking by its rightful original inhabitants; 
     
    — Israeli democracy, the only “real” one in the Middle East; in fact, Israel is democratic like South Africa was apartheid and much worse; “Civil liberty, due process and the most basic human rights” apply only for Jews; 
     
    — “security (is) the motor force of Israeli foreign policy” because it’s surrounded by hostile Arab states; and 
     
    — “Zionism (is) the moral legatee of the victims of the Holocaust….the most pervasive and insidious of the” Zionist myths; in fact, Zionists, like future prime minister Yitzhak Shamir, openly colluded with the Nazis for their own purposes – to use persecution as justification for a future Zionist state and more. 
     
    It wasn’t just to colonize Palestine. It was also to exploit indigenous people as cheap labor, dispossess and disperse them, replace them with arriving Jews, legitimize ethnic cleansing, and remove Palestinians from their land and history. Historical records were falsified. “Palestinians were re-invented as a semi-savage, nomadic remnant.” Mass elimination methods were justified for a “people too many.” 
     
    In 1923, hard line revisionist leader Ze’ev Jabotinsky argued that Arab nationalists opposed a Jewish state and wouldn’t accept one. Thus peaceful coexistence was unattainable, and Jews had to build “an iron wall of (superior) Jewish military force.” The idea was to discourage Arab hopes of destroying Israel followed by a negotiated settlement giving Israel the upper hand to dictate terms. Terror was to be used the way Joseph Weitz, head of the Jewish Agency’s Colonization Department, wrote in 1940: 
     
    “Between ourselves, it must be clear that there is no room for both peoples together in this country. We shall not achieve our goal if the Arabs are in this small country. There is no other way than to (get rid of) all of them. Not one village, not one tribe should be left.”  The secret Koenig Report, later published in 1976, said: 
     
    “We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population.” 
     
    Chairman Heilbrun of the Committee for the Re-Election of Tel Aviv mayor Shlomo Lahat (1974 – 1993) stated: 
     
    “We have to kill all the Palestinians unless they are resigned to live here as slaves.” 
     
    Former IDF Chief of Staff Raphael Eitan (1978 – 1983) said: 
     
    “We declare openly that the Arabs have no right to settle on even one centimeter of Eretz Israel….Force is all they do or ever will understand. We shall use the ultimate force until the Palestinians come crawling to us on all fours.” 
     
    Other Israeli leaders voiced similar extremism, including David Ben Gurion, Israel’s first prime minister, saying in 1937 thatWe must expel the Arabs and take their place and if we have to use force, to guarantee our own right to settle in those places – then we have force at our disposal.” 
     
    At inception, Zionists like Herzl were pragmatic, yet devious, in believing imperial power backing was needed to establish a Jewish state. It could have been anywhere, but Palestine was chosen for its symbolic significance as the ancient Jewish homeland. Colonization began after the first Zionist Congress in Basle, Switzerland in 1897. Herzl later wrote: 
     
    “At Basle, I founded the Jewish state….If not in five years, then certainly in fifty everyone will realize it.” It took 51 by dispossessing indigenous Palestinians and replacing them with Jews. Ever since, Zionism’s most effective legitimacy claim is the notion of preventing another “Holocaust.” It’s justified the most outrageous crimes, characterized as “self-defense” by a tiny Jewish minority surrounded by hordes of hostile Arabs. It seized Palestinian land, Judaized it, created a new nation for Jews alone – undemocratic, imperial, militant, violent, exploitive, oppressive, racist, and hostile to core Judaic dogma. 
     
    It’s why growing thousands of Jews globally oppose an ideology based on power, conquest, dispossession, and violation of the most fundamental Jewish ethical and moral teachings, ones Zionists disdain. 
     
    Not In My Name 
    It calls itself a “predominantly Jewish organization deeply committed to a peaceful and just resolution of the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, a resolution that will provide safety, security and freedom for Jews, Palestinians, and all others living in this region.” It opposes: 
     
    — the illegal West Bank and Gaza occupations; 
    — the West Bank and East Jerusalem settlements; 
    — Israel’s Separation Wall; 
    — the collective punishment of millions of Occupied Palestinians and Israeli Arabs; and 
    — Israeli human rights abuses, home demolitions, land seizures, arbitrary arrests, torture, travel and movement restrictions, and closure and encirclements of villages and communities. 
     
    It champions Palestinian self-determination, the right of return, and “full equality, civil rights and economic justice for all.” It’s for a shared Jerusalem and nuclear-free Middle East. It wants an end to violence and injustice and the equitable sharing of vital resources, including water, oil, gas, electric power, and all other essentials to life and well-being. It wants all US aid stopped until Israel ends its occupation and acts like a civilized state. 
     
    It deplores Zionism and what it represents. It’s activists have chapters around the world. They organize protests and demonstrations, hold vigils and religious ceremonies, communicate with the media, foster dialogue between Jews and Palestinians, sponsor teach-ins, educational forums and study groups. 
     
    They believe that moral human beings are obligated “to speak out and take action.” They refuse to remain silent or accept Israeli crimes passively. They’re one among other like-minded organizations that say “Not In My Name.” Not now or ever.
      …..
    A Final Comment 
    At its core, Zionism is fundamentally racist, extremist, undemocratic, and militant: 
     
    — in espousing Jewish supremacy, exceptionalism, and uniqueness as God’s “chosen people;” 
    — in relying on occupation, oppression, violence and dispossession; 
    — in justifying a Jewish ethnocracy based on structural inequalities; 
    — in ruling by force, not coexistence; 
    — in choosing confrontation over diplomacy and the rule of law; and 
    — by denying Arabs and all others the same rights as Jews. 
     
    No ideology that destructive can endure. No regional peace and reconciliation is possible until it’s repudiated.
     
  • For Jewish organizations that opposes Zionism click here!

end

December 9, 2009 Posted by | GeoPolitics, History | , , , , , , , | 16 Comments

Cap and Trade is a Scam! It is a Global Tax for World Government!

  • Man made global warming is a total fraud. It is a globalist scam to implement a world government and a world tax. We will all be taxed for just being human. It will steal money from the rich western countries (especially America) and make life unbearable for 3rd world countries. The cost of gains could easily double! More land will be set aside for crops that will be grown for renewal energy like bio-diesel. This is the major cause of food price increases. When grain prices double, it will make economic survival untenable for alot of 3rd world families. All the taxes will depress economic development in poor countries. The Heritage Foundation reports:
      
    Cap and Trade Top Ten List
    – Cap and Trade Is a Massive Energy Tax.
    – It Will Not Make A Substantive Impact on the Environment.
    – It Will Kill Jobs.
    – It Will Cause Electricity Bills and Gas Prices to Sharply Increase
    – It Will Outsource Manufacturing Jobs and Hurt Free Trade
    – It Will Make You Choose Between Energy, Groceries, Clothing, and Haircuts
    – It Will Be Highly Susceptible to Fraud and Corruption
    – It Will Hurt Senior Citizens, the Poor, and the Unemployed the Worst.
    – It Will Cost American Families Over $3,000 a Year.
    – President Obama Admitted “Electricity Rates Would Necessarily Skyrocket” under a cap-and-trade program (January 2008)
      
    What Would Global Warming Regulations Do?
    Lieberman-Warner: Last year, the Senate rejected
    cap-and-tax legislation that would have capped CO2 emissions 70% below 2005 levels by 2050. A Heritage analysis of that bill found startling economic impacts.
     
    Markey-Waxman: The cap-and-trade tax proposed by Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) and Rep. Edward Markey (D-MA) would double down on last year’s failed scheme, bringing in trillions of dollars in taxes, making it one of the
    largest sources of revenue for the federal government.
     
    – Six Hundred Hurricanes Couldn’t Cause This Much Economic Damage: In the first 20 years,
    Lieberman-Warner would have destroyed nearly 3 million jobs, caused some manufacturing sectors to cut jobs by 50% and generated up to $300 billion per year in government revenue while reducing income by nearly $5 trillion. For comparison, this is equal to the economic damage done by over 600 hurricanes …and the Markey-Waxman bill is worse.
     
    – Green Jobs Are a Myth, Real Job Losses are Not: For every “green job” created, others are wiped out. Job losses resulting from the Lieberman-Warner cap and trade would have surpassed 900,000 in some years. Keep in mind that this is net of any “
    green jobs” created.
     
    – New Version, More Expensive: Markey-Waxman will be much more costly than the bill rejected by the U.S. Senate last year. Such an expensive tax on all Americans is
    bad under normal circumstances and worse during a recession.
      

    A “Carbon Constrained Future”
    The Ultimate Outsourcing: India and China have repeatedly said they would not match U.S. environmental goals in order to protect their economies. Cap and trade will merely move manufacturing jobs to China and India.
     
    By 2100: By EPA calculations, the Lieberman-Warner bill could at best result in a global drop in temperature of only 0.1 to 0.2 degrees Celsius by the year 2100.
     
    A Carbon Tax Would Be No Different: Alternative carbon taxes share the central flaw of any other carbon reduction scheme. Similar to cap and trade, a carbon tax would cause significant economic damage and would do very little to reduce global temperatures.
     
    An Alternative That Supports American Taxpayers: Instead of appeasing a radical environmental agenda, President Obama should give us access to all energy sources, including domestic oil production, nuclear energy, coal, and new renewable fuels. Instead of new taxes, the President should aim to lower gas and electricity prices. When government impediments are lifted, America’s energy entrepreneurs can develop innovative and market-driven solutions to our energy needs.
     
  • See also:
     
    Carbon Tax Agenda: Money for the United Nations!
    Bombshell UN Documents Outline Plan To Use Climategate Crooks In “End Run” Around National Sovereignty !
    ClimateGate Spells End To The False Science of Climate Change !
    Dr. Tim Ball: Man Made Global Warming Myth and The CRU Hacked Documents! 
    ClimateGate – This Is The Greatest Lie Of All Time!
    Global Warming Hoax, Planned in 1961!
    ClimateGate: Copenhagen’s Collapse!

end

December 9, 2009 Posted by | Economics, Social Trends | | 5 Comments

Mish: Nov. Jobs Report “Looked Fabricated”, Expect Harder Times in 2010

Vodpod videos no longer available.

  • I no longer have much confidence in official US economic statistics. The way it is derived is pretty questionable. Highly subjective Birth/Death Model, seasonal adjustments, revisions upon revisions… etc. I am not in agreement with Shedlock on the USD, it will go lower not higher. The Feds need to inflate or die. Yahoo Finance reports:
      
    From President Obama on down, Americans are hoping Friday’s stronger-than-expected November jobs report marked the beginning of the end of our national unemployment nightmare. Don’t get your hopes up, says Mike “Mish” Shedlock, author of
    Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis.
     
    The November report was an “outlier” and “almost looked fabricated,” according to Shedlock, an investment advisor at SitkaPacific Capital Management. Looking beyond the November jobs data, Shedlock says the odds of the unemployment rate coming down anytime soon are remote.
     
    Even based on generous assumptions of 150,000 new jobs per month, no double-dip recession and a declining participation rate as Baby Boomers retire, “the best I can do is suggest the unemployment rate will be over 10% all the way through 2015 and never dip below 8% all the way out through the end of 2020,” Mish says. (You can see
    the detailed analysis here on Mish’s blog and find a downloadable spreadsheet to make your own assumptions and predictions here.)
     
    As confident as he is about the grim outlook for jobs, Shedlock was very reticent to make market predictions in the accompanying video, taped Friday evening at Minyanville’s annual
    Holiday Festivus in New York City. “I think the best trade [of 2010] is for those that are nimble and able to roll with the punches whatever they come up with,” he said. “I don’t think realistically anyone knows what it’s going to be.”
     
    In a subsequent email, Shedlock was more willing to take a position, as is more typical of the opinionated blogger:
     
    “In the absence of a war outbreak in the Middle East or Pakistan — and/or Congress going completely insane with more stimulus efforts — I think oil prices are likely to drop, the dollar will strengthen or at least hold its own, and the best opportunities are likely to be on the short side,” he writes. “2010 is highly likely to retrace most if not all of the ‘reflation’ efforts of 2009. If things play out as I suspect, 2010 will be the year of the great retrace as the economic recovery disappoints.”

end

December 9, 2009 Posted by | Economics | , , , , , , | Comments Off on Mish: Nov. Jobs Report “Looked Fabricated”, Expect Harder Times in 2010