Socio-Economics History Blog

Socio-Economics & History Commentary

Nick Begich: HAARP, Weather Control and Mind Control

Part   5     Part   6    Part   7    Part   8     Part   9    Part   10     Part   11  ,   Part   12

  • This is a fascinating interview! Dr. Nick Begich writer of Angels Don’t Play This HAARP, goes on the Coast To Coast show in 2003. Dr Begich explains the weather control technology that the military industrial complex already possessed. He also explains the science behind HAARP and how this technology can be used for mind control. HAARP uses frequency range that is the same as the human brain. By sending specific frequencies, the populace can be made to feel different emotions/manipulations: fear, ecstasy…influencing elections… etc. The military industrial complex undoubtedly has some of these mind control equipment in their black ops arsenal.
      
    The Military’s Pandora’s Box
    …. The mental-disruption possibilities for HAARP are the most disturbing. More than 40 pages of the book, with dozens of footnotes, chronicle the work of Harvard professors, military planners and scientists as they plan and test this use of the electromagnetic technology. For example, one of the papers describing this use was from the International Red Cross in Geneva. It even gave the frequency ranges where these effects could occur — the same ranges which HAARP is capable of broadcasting.
     
    The following statement was made more than twenty-five years ago in a book by Brzezinski which he wrote while a professor at Columbia University:
     
    “Political strategists are tempted to exploit research on the brain and human behavior. Geophysicist Gordon J.F. MacDonald, a specialist in problems of warfare, says accurately-timed, artificially-excited electronic strokes could lead to a pattern of oscillations that produce relatively high power levels over certain regions of the earth … in this way one could develop a system that would seriously impair the brain performance of very large populations in selected regions over an extended period”
     
    ” … no matter how deeply disturbing the thought of using the environment to manipulate behavior for national advantages, to some, the technology permitting such use will very probably develop within the next few decades.”
     
    In 1966, MacDonald was a member of the President’s Science Advisory Committee and later a member of the President’s Council on Environmental Quality. He published papers on the use of environmental control technologies for military purposes. The most profound comment he made as a geophysicist was, “the key to geophysical warfare is the identification of environmental instabilities to which the addition of a small amount of energy would release vastly greater amounts of energy.” While yesterday’s geophysicists predicted today’s advances, are HAARP program managers delivering on the vision?
       …..  
    As early as 1970, Zbigniew Brzezinski predicted a “more controlled and directed society” would gradually appear, linked to technology. This society would be dominated by an elite group which impresses voters by allegedly superior scientific know-how. Angels Don’t Play This HAARP further quotes Brzezinski:
     
    “Unhindered by the restraints of traditional liberal values, this elite would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by using the latest modern techniques for influencing public behavior and keeping society under close surveillance and control. Technical and scientific momentum would then feed on the situation it exploits,” Brzezinski predicted.
     
    His forecasts proved accurate. Today, a number of new tools for the “elite” are emerging, and the temptation to use them increases steadily. The policies to permit the tools to be used are already in place. How could the United States be changed, bit by bit, into the predicted highly-controlled technosociety? Among the “steppingstones” Brzezinski expected were persisting social crises and use of the mass media to gain the public’s confidence.
     
    In another document prepared by the government, the U.S. Air Force claims: “The potential applications of artificial electromagnetic fields are wide-ranging and can be used in many military or quasi-military situations… Some of these potential uses include dealing with terrorist groups, crowd control, controlling breaches of security at military installations, and antipersonnel techniques in tactical warfare. In all of these cases the EM (electromagnetic) systems would be used to produce mild to severe physiological disruption or perceptual distortion or disorientation. In addition, the ability of individuals to function could be degraded to such a point that they would be combat ineffective. Another advantage of electromagnetic systems is that they can provide coverage over large areas with a single system. They are silent and countermeasures to them may be difficult to develop… One last area where electromagnetic radiation may prove of some value is in enhancing abilities of individuals for anomalous phenomena.”
     
    Do these comments point to uses already somewhat developed? The author of the government report refers to an earlier Air Force document about the uses of radio frequency radiation in combat situations. (Here Begich and Manning note that HAARP is the most versatile and the largest radio-frequency-radiation transmitter in the world.) 
     

HumanMind_Big

  • Dr. Begich has also written another book :
     
    The Technologies of Political Control or Tools for Peak Performance
    This is the Century of the brain and the mind. The technologies that have advanced, under cover of secrecy and national security, now have the power to either enslave us or free us to our higher potentials. These technologies will impact our consciousness itself and as a result require an invigorated public debate, in the light of day. At the same time, there is hope and great possibility in these areas of science. The first part of this book deals with the sinister side of Controlling the Human Mind with the second part exploring the possibilities that are emerging with new brain and mind enhancing technologies. The greatest threats and the greatest possibilities reside within the core of who we are and what happens in the center of our minds, the seat of our souls. This is the most important book yet released from the research efforts of Dr. Nick Begich
     
    “The best deterrent that we have against acts of terrorism is to find out who is conspiring, who has the material, where they are getting it, who they are talking to, and what are their plans. In order to do that, in order to interdict the terrorists before they set off their weapon, you have to have that kind of intelligence-gathering capability, but it runs smack into our constitutional protections of privacy. And it’s a tension which will continue to exist in every free society – the reconciliation of the need for liberty and the need for law and order….that once these weapons start to be exploded people will say, “Protect us. We’re willing to give up some of our liberties and some of our freedoms, but you must protect us.” And that is what will lead us into this 21st century, this kind of Constitutional tension of how much protection can we provide and still preserve essential liberties.”
     
    Secretary of Defense William S.  Cohen, Defense Viewpoint, December 1, 1998
     
    “One can envision the development of electromagnetic energy sources, the output of which can be pulsed, shaped, and focused, that can couple with the human body in a fashion that will allow one to prevent voluntary muscular movements, control emotions (and thus actions), produce sleep, transmit suggestions, interfere with both short-term and long-term memory, produce an experience set, and delete an experience set. It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction…Thus, it may be possible to ‘talk’ to selected adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them.”
       
    United States Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, New World Vistas: Air and Space Power For The 21st Century
     
  • See also :
      
    Mind Control: The Ultimate Brave New World by Dr. Nick Begich
    Weather Warfare Weapons – Part 1
    Weather Warfare Weapons – Part 2

end

October 28, 2009 Posted by | Science & Technology, Social Trends | , | 6 Comments

Gardasil Researcher Drops A Bombshell !

  • I thank God for Dr. Diane Harper for telling the truth though she stands to lose a bundle of money. Big Pharma is all about the money. They are pushing vaccines big time because you can sell vaccine to everyone, even the healthy. With normal medicine, only the sick will buy it.
     
  • Who owns all these big corporations? The same cabal who owns the MSM, military industrial complex, Big Oil, governments, … large industrial conglomerates….. etc. It is said that 1-2 families own more than 50% of the world. I agree. Go ahead and do your own research to see whether this is true or not! The Bulletin reports :
     
    Harper: Controversal Drug Will Do Little To Reduce Cervical Cancer Rates
    Dr. Diane Harper, lead researcher in the development of two human papilloma virus vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix, said the controversial drugs will do little to reduce cervical cancer rates and, even though they’re being recommended for girls as young as nine, there have been no efficacy trials in children under the age of 15.
     
    Dr. Harper, director of the Gynecologic Cancer Prevention Research Group at the University of Missouri, made these remarks during an address at the 4th International Public Conference on Vaccination which took place in Reston, Virginia on Oct. 2-4. Although her talk was intended to promote the vaccine, participants said they came away convinced the vaccine should not be received.
     
    “I came away from the talk with the perception that the risk of adverse side effects is so much greater than the risk of cervical cancer, I couldn’t help but question why we need the vaccine at all,” said Joan Robinson, Assistant Editor at the Population Research Institute.
     
    Dr. Harper began her remarks by explaining that 70 percent of all HPV infections resolve themselves without treatment within a year. Within two years, the number climbs to 90 percent. Of the remaining 10 percent of HPV infections, only half will develop into cervical cancer, which leaves little need for the vaccine.
     
    She went on to surprise the audience by stating that the incidence of cervical cancer in the U.S. is already so low that “even if we get the vaccine and continue PAP screening, we will not lower the rate of cervical cancer in the US.” There will be no decrease in cervical cancer until at least 70 percent of the population is vaccinated, and even then, the decrease will be minimal.
     
    Apparently, conventional treatment and preventative measures are already cutting the cervical cancer rate by four percent a year. At this rate, in 60 years, there will be a 91.4 percent decline just with current treatment. Even if 70 percent of women get the shot and required boosters over the same time period, which is highly unlikely, Harper says Gardasil still could not claim to do as much as traditional care is already doing.
     
    Dr. Harper, who also serves as a consultant to the World Health Organization, further undercut the case for mass vaccination by saying that “four out of five women with cervical cancer are in developing countries.” Ms. Robinson said she could not help but wonder, “If this is the case, then why vaccinate at all? But from the murmurs of the doctors in the audience, it was apparent that the same thought was occurring to them.”
     
    However, at this point, Dr. Harper dropped an even bigger bombshell on the audience when she announced that, “There have been no efficacy trials in girls under 15 years.” Merck, the manufacturer of Gardasil, studied only a small group of girls under 16 who had been vaccinated, but did not follow them long enough to conclude sufficient presence of effective HPV antibodies.
     
    This is not the first time Dr. Harper revealed the fact that Merck never tested Gardasil for safety in young girls. During a 2007 interview with KPC
    News.com, she said giving the vaccine to girls as young as 11 years-old “is a great big public health experiment.”
     
    At the time, which was at the height of Merck’s controversial drive to have the vaccine mandated in schools, Dr. Harper remained steadfastly opposed to the idea and said she had been trying for months to convince major television and print media about her concerns, “but no one will print it.”
     
    “It is silly to mandate vaccination of 11 to 12 year old girls,” she said at the time. “There also is not enough evidence gathered on side effects to know that safety is not an issue.” When asked why she was speaking out, she said: “I want to be able to sleep with myself when I go to bed at night.” 
     
    Since the drug’s introduction in 2006, the public has been learning many of these facts the hard way. To date, 15,037 girls have officially reported adverse side effects from Gardasil to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). These adverse reactions include Guilliane Barre, lupus, seizures, paralysis, blood clots, brain inflammation and many others. The CDC acknowledges that there have been 44 reported deaths.
     
    Dr. Harper also participated in the research on Glaxo-Smith-Kline’s version of the drug, Cervarix, currently in use in the UK but not yet approved here. Since the government began administering the vaccine to school-aged girls last year, more than 2,000 patients reported some kind of adverse reaction including nausea, dizziness, blurred vision, convulsions, seizures and hyperventilation. Several reported multiple reactions, with 4,602 suspected side-effects recorded in total. The most tragic case involved a 14 year-old girl who dropped dead in the corridor of her school an hour after receiving the vaccination.
     
    The outspoken researcher also weighed in last month on a report published in the Journal of the American Medical Association that raised questions about the safety of the vaccine, saying bluntly: “The rate of serious adverse events is greater than the incidence rate of cervical cancer.”
     
    Ms. Robinson said she respects Dr. Harper’s candor. “I think she’s a scientist, a researcher, and she’s genuine enough a scientist to be open about the risks. I respect that in her.” However, she failed to make the case for Gardasil. “For me, it was hard to resist the conclusion that Gardasil does almost nothing for the health of American women.” 
     
  • See also :
     
    Drug Expert: Cervical Cancer Vaccine More Deadly Than Cancer it Supposedly Prevents !
    2000 SchoolGirls Suffer Suspected Ill-Effects from Cervical Cancer Vaccine !
    1300 Girls Harmed by HPV Vaccines in UK; Bizarre Side Effects Like Paralysis and Epilepsy
    Dr Gary Null Speaking Out in New York State Assembly Hearing: Vaccines are Dangerous! The #1 Cause of Death in United States is American Medicine!

end

October 28, 2009 Posted by | Medicine & Health | | 3 Comments

Coming in December 2009: World Government?

  • The Satanic ruling cabal seem to be escalating the schedule towards a world government. This is probably a sign that the war in heaven is heating up! Satan and his minions’ time in heaven is running out.
     
  • This ‘climate change’ bill to be signed by all nations in December is a stealth bill for world government. They cannot openly get everyone to accept their fascist laws. The public will definitely reject it. So they have to do it by stealth. The bill will introduce global taxation which the UN will be empowered to collect! Henry Lamb explains (emphasis mine):
      
    It is impossible to overstate the importance of the climate-change treaty now being negotiated for adoption at the Copenhagen, Denmark, U.N. meeting in December. The Kyoto Protocol was bad enough. It required the United States to reduce its carbon emissions 7 percent below 1990 levels by 2012. When fully implemented, the Kyoto target was supposed to reduce global carbon emissions by 5.2 percent. Thanks to George W. Bush, the U.S. did not participate in the Kyoto accord.
     
    According to the World Bank,
    global emissions have risen by 19 percent since 1990. U.S. emissions have risen 20 percent since 1990. India’s and China’s emissions have risen by 88 percent and 73 percent respectively. Neither of these countries was bound by the Kyoto Protocol.
     
    The new treaty now under negotiation seeks to impose an emissions reduction requirement on developed countries of as much as 45 percent below 1990 levels by 2017, and by as much as 95 percent by 2050. (Read paragraph 31 on page 16 of the
    181-page negotiating text). These numbers are completely ridiculous; compliance would require a return to the Stone Age.
     
    The ongoing negotiations include whether developing nations will be required to reduce emissions, and if so, by how much. China, a so-called developing nation, has now surpassed the United States as the world’s No. 1 carbon emitter.
     
    Regardless of the final numbers the negotiators decide upon, it will make no difference to the climate. It will, however, make an enormous difference to people, especially the people who live in the United States and the other developed nations.

     
    Read the truth about climate change in “Red Hot Lies: How Global Warming Alarmists Use Threats, Fraud, and Deception to Keep You Misinformed”
     
    This treaty will create an international bureaucracy with the authority to regulate energy use. This entity would, in fact, be a political institution with the power to govern. In other words, the treaty will create a world government to administer global governance.
     
    Lord Christopher Monckton created a tidal wave across the Internet with excerpts from his
    Oct. 14 presentation to the Minnesota Free Market Institute. He, too, has read the negotiating text and says without hesitation that this treaty will create a world government. He goes further, much further, to explain that while this treaty will have no impact on global climate, it will have a great impact on the global economy.
     
    The purpose of the treaty is, and has been since the very beginning of negotiations in the early 1990s, to transfer the wealth from developed nations to the developing nations – under the supervision of the United Nations. Treaty negotiations justify this action because developed nations have spewed more carbon into the atmosphere than the developing nations. Therefore, according to U.N. reasoning, it is the developed nations that caused the global warming, so the developing nations are entitled to compensation.
     
    Go figure. Or better yet, go wade through the negotiating text, but only if you have a strong stomach. It will make a non-Marxist throw-up. Monckton rightfully says that President Obama will sign the treaty. It will take more than his signature to make the treaty binding, however. It will take the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Senate to ratify whatever comes out of Copenhagen.
      …..
    The treaty negotiators in Copenhagen will also have to decide how to enforce whatever emissions reductions they eventually decide are appropriate. In the past, negotiators considered using the International Criminal Court. The World Trade Organization has also been considered; the WTO has the authority to levy sanctions for various forms of misconduct. But now, a new possible enforcement mechanism is in the wind: a new international monetary-policy mechanism that has been under development for the better part of a year. Obama gave his blessing to the G-20 recently, and this group is working toward controlling the global economy, much like the Federal Reserve controls the domestic economy.
     
    Negotiators have talked openly about requiring developed nations to contribute 2 percent of their GDP to the new U.N. climate-change mechanism. To put this in perspective, total U.S. defense spending reached 3.9 percent of GDP in 2005. Imagine paying what amounts to a U.N. tax roughly equal to half our total defense budget for redistribution to developing nations. This would satisfy what the U.N. calls the “carbon debt” owed by developed nations to the rest of the world.
     
    The only way to insure that this treaty will not by imposed upon every American is to change the majority in Congress to people who pledge to reject all forms of international control. There are only 53 weeks before voters will choose America’s future. It’s time to get started.

end

October 28, 2009 Posted by | GeoPolitics, Social Trends | , | 6 Comments

Man Made Global Warming is A Hoax: The Big Chill !

end

October 28, 2009 Posted by | GeoPolitics, Social Trends | , | Comments Off

Amnesty International: Palestinians Denied Water !

Palestinian_Girl_Water_Shortage

Some Palestinians only get 20 litres of water a day, Amnesty says. Source: BBC.

  • The Zionist state of Israel is at it again. Keep in mind that the Zionist state of Israel is not the Israel of the bible! The Palestinians are slowly being massacred! BBC reports:
      
    Israel is denying Palestinians access to even the basic minimum of clean, safe water, Amnesty International says.
    In a report, the human rights group says Israeli water restrictions discriminate against Palestinians in the occupied West Bank. It says that in Gaza, Israel’s blockade has pushed the already ailing water and sewage system to “crisis point”. Israel says the report is flawed and the Palestinians get more water than was agreed under the 1990s peace deal.
     
    ‘Basic need’
    In the 112-page report, Amnesty says that on average Palestinian daily water consumption reaches 70 litres a day, compared with 300 litres for the Israelis.
      
    It says that some Palestinians barely get 20 litres a day – the minimum recommended even in humanitarian emergencies. While Israeli settlers in the West Bank enjoy lush gardens and swimming pools, Amnesty describes a series of Israeli measures it says are discriminating against Palestinians:
     
    - Israel has “entirely appropriated the Palestinians’ share of the Jordan river” and uses 80% of a key shared aquifer
    - West Bank Palestinians are not allowed to drill wells without Israeli permits, which are “often impossible” to obtain
    - Rainwater harvesting cisterns are “often destroyed by the Israeli army” 
    - Israeli soldiers confiscated a water tanker from villagers who were trying to remain in land Israel had declared a “closed military area”
    - An unnamed Israeli soldier says rooftop Palestinian household water tanks are “good for target practice”
    - Much of the land cut off by the West Bank barrier is land with good access to a major aquifer
    - Israeli military operations have damaged Palestinian water infrastructure, including $6m worth during the Cast Lead operation in Gaza last winter
    - The Israeli-Egyptian blockade of Gaza has “exacerbated what was already a dire situation” by denying many building materials needed for water and sewage projects. 

     
    The report also noted that the Palestinian water authorities have been criticised for bad management, quoting one audit that described the sector as in “total chaos”. “Water is a basic need and a right, but for many Palestinians obtaining even poor-quality, subsistence-level quantities of water has become a luxury that they can barely afford,” Amnesty’s Donatella Rovera said. “Israel must end its discriminatory policies, immediately lift all the restrictions it imposes on Palestinians’ access to water.”
     
  • Praise be to the Messiah, the Son of God: Jesus Christ for his love for all people. For God so loved the world….. . God’s laws are loving, kind and gentle. Never about abusing, oppressing and discriminating against strangers. The commandments of God are very clear :
     
    Exodus 22:21
    “You shall neither mistreat a stranger nor oppress him, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt.
    Exodus 23:9

    “Also you shall not oppress a stranger, for you know the heart of a stranger, because you were strangers in the land of Egypt.
    Leviticus 19:33
    ‘And if a stranger dwells with you in your land, you shall not mistreat him. 
    Leviticus 19:34
    The stranger who dwells among you shall be to you as one born among you, and you shall love him as yourself; for you were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God.  
    Leviticus 23:22
    ‘When you reap the harvest of your land, you shall not wholly reap the corners of your field when you reap, nor shall you gather any gleaning from your harvest. You shall leave them for the poor and for the stranger: I am the LORD your God.’” 
    Leviticus 24:22
    You shall have the same law for the stranger and for one from your own country; for I am the LORD your God.’”

end

October 28, 2009 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , , | 12 Comments

The Day Israel Used Boy Aged 13 As Human Shield!

humanshield

The day Israel Used A Boy aged 13 as Human Shield! Somebody is messing with this posting! If it does not display correctly, just click on the link!

end

October 28, 2009 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , | Comments Off

Rocket Fired from Lebanon Prompts Israeli Barrage !

  • Will we see another war between Lebanon and Israel? Nobody can say for certain. But it definitely will not be a surprise seeing the build up of forces along the border and the rising tension over the temple mount. Yahoo News reports :
     
    A Katyusha rocket fired from Lebanon hit northern Israel on Tuesday night without causing casualties, prompting Israel to retaliate with artillery, sources on both sides said. The attack, which was not immediately claimed, was the latest incident in growing cross-border tensions, and an Israeli military spokeswoman laid ultimate blame on the Beirut government.
     
    The rocket landed in open ground east of the Israeli town of Kiryat Shmona and started a fire but caused no serious damage, sources there said. A security source in Lebanon said eight rockets fired from Israel then hit near the border village of Hula. There were no immediate reports of casualties. At about the same time, witnesses in Kiryat Shmona said Israeli artillery retaliated by firing on southern Lebanon. An Israeli military spokeswoman later confirmed that “artillery had opened fire on the sector from which the Katyusha rocket was fired.”
     
    She said the army considered the attack as “serious, and considers that responsibility for it falls on the Lebanese government.” UN peacekeeping troops and the Lebanese army cut off the road to Hula and searched the area…
     
  • See also:
     
    Temple Mount Tensions Rising! Conflicts Escalating!?
    Israel Increasing Military Build-Up Near Lebanon!
    Professor Weiss: Build Third Temple Immediately! Clashes Ignite Over Al-Aqsa Mosque!

end

October 28, 2009 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , | 2 Comments

   

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 712 other followers