Socio-Economics History Blog

Socio-Economics & History Commentary

Do Drug Companies Secretly Favor a World Flu Pandemic?

  • Cui Bono? Big Pharma! This A/H1N1 swine flu is man made! However, it is very mild and most people recover within 3-4 days. The danger is the vaccine! There is a depopulation agenda behind this mass vaccination drive. Please spread the word to as many as possible!
     
  • Dr Mercola advises :
      
    In early May, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius admitted the swine flu virus was not quite the fearsome plague it was widely reported to be in April when the novel influenza A strain(official name H1N1) first emerged in the U.S. On May 6, Sebelius said:
     
    “We are cautiously optimistic that what we are seeing right now is presenting itself as a much milder virus than the initial cases … in Mexico.”[1]
     
    Ms. Sebelius’ remark was likely prompted by the fact the swine flu virus is showing itself to have mild symptoms, quick recovery time, and low incidence of death among the vast majority of H1N1 patients throughout the world (with the single exception of Mexico).
     
    A little over a month later, on June 11, the World Health Organization (WHO) raised its swine flu pandemic alert from a 5 to a 6.
    [2] Phase 6 is the highest level alert, and reflects the speed with which a virus is spreading – not its severity.
     
    WHO actually considers the severity of the H1N1 virus to be moderate, generally defined as an illness requiring neither hospitalization nor even medical care.
    [3] 
     
    From Cautious Optimism to High Risk Pessimism in Under Six Weeks
    A few days after the Phase 6 designation, on June 16, Sebelius began urging school superintendents across the nation to prepare for the possibility their schools would be turned into swine flu shot clinics in the fall.
     
    According to Sebelius, “If you think about vaccinating kids, schools are the logical place.” She says if the current trend continues, “… the target may be school-age children as a first priority for vaccination.”
    [4]
     
    And now it is being reported that the United States will spend an
    additional $1 billion on ingredients for an H1N1 vaccine. Another billion dollars for a virus with mild symptoms?
     
    Why this sudden urgency to mass vaccinate, now that the real risks of the swine flu have been shown to be both mild and infrequent?

     
    Where is the Logic in Mass-Vaccinating Kids?
    Never mind the serious health risks of flu vaccines, which I’ll get to shortly. What happened to common sense? Why are your school-age children being targeted by the Department of Health and Human Services as the “first priority” for novel H1N1 vaccinations that have not undergone adequate safety testing?
     
    Per WHO, most cases of severe and fatal swine flu infections have occurred in people aged 30 to 502. Many of those cases were seen in people who were already ill with disorders like asthma, heart disease, diabetes, autoimmune diseases and obesity.
     
    Additionally, the swine flu virus presents much less threat of death to Americans than all other strains of influenza combined!
    [5] Why is your healthy youngster, who is highly unlikely to contract a severe case of swine flu, about to go to the front of the line to receive two doses of a rushed-to-market flu vaccine?
     
    Worse yet, if you have a child with an established health condition, do you really want him or her injected with an experimental vaccine?
    Children with underlying health problems will likely be the first to receive the vaccine, since they will be considered the most probable group to develop severe cases of the H1N1 virus. Unfortunately, these children are also the ones most vulnerable to serious side effects from the vaccine.
     
    Your Child May Be Pushed to Get FOUR Flu Shots This Fall
    On July 15th, Dr. Pascale Wortley, the U.S. CDC’s pandemic vaccine coordinator, announced,
     
    “This vaccine campaign will unfold quite differently than seasonal flu. This is a huge endeavor we”re gearing up for.”
     
    According to the latest CDC recommendations, school children who have never had a flu shot may need four flu shots this fall. Two doses of the seasonal flu vaccine, and another two against the swine flu. Most everyone else should expect three shots. Looking on the bright side, there are still two slivers of relief in this madness.
     
    1. It appears the pandemic flu shots (like the seasonal flu vaccine) are still voluntary, although most evidence strongly suggest that compulsory vaccinations is a HIGH probability.2. About 20 percent of the vaccines created will be preservative-free, and made available to children and pregnant women who want them
     
    Adults, however, will receive shots from multi-dose vials that WILL contain thimerosal. That said, please read on to find out why opting for a preservative-free vaccine is likely not enough if you want to protect the health of your child, and why you and your family may be FAR better off avoiding both the seasonal- and pandemic flu vaccines.
     
    Flu Shots Simply Don’t Work
    Because addressing the potential side effects of these untested swine flu vaccines is not the only problem here. Numerous studies have shown that flu shots simply do not work. Why would this case be any different? For example:
     
    – According to the
    2006 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 51 separate studies concluded the flu vaccine worked no better than a placebo in 260,000 children ranging in age from six months to 23 months.
     
    – A study published in the
    October 2008 Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine found flu vaccines in young children have made no difference in the number of flu-related doctor and hospital visits.
     
    – As reported in a 2004 publication of the Archives of Disease in Childhood, a study of 800 children with asthma concluded those receiving a flu vaccine had a significantly increased risk of asthma-related doctor and emergency room visits.
    [6]
     
    – A more recent study released at the 2009 American Thoracic Society International Conference showed children with asthma who received FluMist had a 3-fold increased risk for hospitalization.
    [7]  
     
    And not only are vaccines ineffective in preventing flu in your children, they are equally useless for adults, including the elderly.
     
    – According to the 2007 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, studies of over 65,000 healthy adults concluded vaccinations reduced the risk of flu by only six percent, and reduced missed work days by less than a single day. Vaccinations did not reduce the number of people who sought medical help or took time off from work.
    [8]
     
    – The 2006 Cochrane Database also includes a review of 64 vaccination studies of the elderly across nearly 100 flu seasons. The studies showed flu vaccines were ineffective in preventing the flu in either nursing home patients or elderly living in the community.
    [9]
     
    – A study published in the
    Lancet last year found that influenza vaccination was NOT associated with a reduced risk of pneumonia in older people. This supports a study done five years ago, published in The New England Journal of Medicine.
     
    – Research published in the
    American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine also confirms that there has been no decrease in deaths from influenza and pneumonia, despite the fact that vaccination coverage among the elderly has increased from 15 percent in 1980 to 65 percent now.
     
    Last year, researchers with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and the National Institutes of Health published this conclusion in the Lancet Infectious Diseases:
     
    “We conclude that frailty selection bias and use of non-specific endpoints such as all-cause mortality have led cohort studies to greatly exaggerate vaccine benefits.”
     
    Flu Vaccines Pose Significant Health Risks to Your Children
    Most flu vaccines contain dangerous levels of mercury in the form of thimerosal, a deadly preservative that is 50 times more toxic than regular mercury.[10] If taken in high enough doses, it can result in long-term immune, sensory, neurological, motor, and behavioral dysfunctions.
     
    Disorders associated with mercury poisoning include autism, attention deficit disorder, multiple sclerosis, and speech and language deficiencies.
     
    The Institute of Medicine has warned that infants, children, and pregnant women should not be injected with thimerosal, and yet the majority of flu shots contain 25 micrograms of it.
     
    It has been calculated that, by age two, American children have received 237 micrograms of mercury from vaccines alone, which far exceeds the current EPA “safe” level of 0.1 mcg/kg per day. But that’s not all. Other
    toxic substances found in various flu vaccines include:
Ethylene glycol (antifreeze) Neomycin and streptomycin (antibiotics) Resin and gelatin – known to cause allergic reactions
Formaldehyde – a known cancer causing agent Aluminum — a neurotoxin linked to Alzheimer’s disease Polysorbate 80 (Tween80™) – which can cause severe allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis
Phenol (carbolic acid) Triton X100 (detergent) Egg proteins (including avian viruses)

end

July 29, 2009 - Posted by | Medicine & Health | ,

9 Comments

  1. […] here: Do Drug Companies Secretly Favor a World Flu Pandemic? « Socio … Tagged as: archives, automotive, depopulation, flu-pandemic, health, humor, japan, lancet, […]

    Pingback by Do Drug Companies Secretly Favor a World Flu Pandemic? « Socio … | Write What | July 29, 2009

  2. […] See the original post: Do Drug Companies Secretly Favor a World Flu Pandemic? « Socio … […]

    Pingback by Do Drug Companies Secretly Favor a World Flu Pandemic? « Socio … | North America Flu | July 29, 2009

  3. The Hong KOng government will press on with a program of drug tests for students despite signs of growing opposition and worries about privacy laws being breached.

    The scheme is set to be launched as a pilot program at 23 secondary schools in Tai Po in December, with a review of progress in the middle of next year. The main thrust of the scheme is to provide counseling for those who test positive.

    But social workers have joined the Catholic Church in taking a stand against it, and Privacy Commissioner Roderick Woo Bun has said under-18s may not have the capacity to consent to tests and that the law does not allow parents or guardians to agree on their behalf.

    Permanent Secretary for Education Raymond Wong Hung-chiu said yesterday the government is also concerned about privacy, which is why the Department of Justice was consulted before the government went public with its plans. And the testing will conform with the law, he insisted.

    A spokesman for the Education Bureau said Woo has been contacted about his concerns. Bureau officials, along with the Security Bureau’s Narcotics Division, will soon explain to him plans for protecting privacy.

    Wong is also confident there will not be lawsuits once the program begins because “we will explain to parents and students the reason for collecting the data and how they will be used. The government will put in place measures to protect personal data.”

    Wong’s views received a measure of support from Hong Kong University assistant professor Eric Cheung Tat- ming. The Privacy Ordinance does not come into play, he said, as students have the right to refuse to be tested. Still, students should sign agreements to clarify their consent, and schools must explain how data will be used.

    Social workers, meanwhile, worry that students identified as drug abusers will face expulsion or discrimination by school management.

    Social welfare lawmaker Cheung Kwok-chu said more than half of 500 social workers polled see an invasion of privacy. They also feel that disclosure of test results should not rest with school authorities.

    Deputy Secretary for Education Betty Ip Tsang Chui-hing and Commissioner for Narcotics Sally Wong Pik-yee have already talked with school-based social workers in Tai Po about their roles in the scheme, but what was said has not be revealed.

    Principals, including those from several religious schools, yesterday reconfirmed a commitment to testing. “If we chicken out now, nothing can be done,” said Buddhist Hui Yuan College principal Sung Lim-ping. “So we should take the first step.”

    Confucian Ho Kwok Pui Chun College board member Elaine Lee Bik-wah said: “In secondary education, privacy is not our main concern. It will do them good if we insist on this and be strict.”

    The Catholic Church, however, continues to disapprove, with vicar- general Yeung Ming-cheung describing drug testing as negative.

    Education Is a better alternative, he said.

    香港仔時昌迷你倉

    Comment by 迷你倉 | August 12, 2009

  4. […] Children Who Get Flu Vaccine Have Three Times Risk Of Hospitalization For Flu, Study Suggests Do Drug Companies Secretly Favor a World Flu Pandemic? History of Bird Flu and the Illuminati Depopulation Agenda by Dr. True Ott Flashback: Homeless […]

    Pingback by Nationwide Revolt Against Mass Swine Flu Vaccination Accelerates « Socio-Economics History Blog | August 19, 2009

  5. […] think so. In fact, vaccines can and have caused cancer in the past. Watch the 3rd video in the post Do Drug Companies Secretly Favor a World Flu Pandemic? (It was made at Merck video). […]

    Pingback by German Health Expert: Does Swine Flu Vaccine Increase the Risk of Cancer? « Socio-Economics History Blog | August 24, 2009

  6. Thanks for the information.

    By 迷你倉

    Comment by 迷你倉 | November 4, 2009

  7. […] Forced/Mandatory Vaccination! Baxter Files Swine Flu Vaccine Patent A Year Ahead Of Outbreak Do Drug Companies Secretly Favor a World Flu Pandemic? History of Bird Flu and the Illuminati Depopulation Agenda by Dr. True Ott Flashback: Homeless […]

    Pingback by Boy Diagnosed with Guillain-Barre Syndrome After Swine Flu Shot! « Socio-Economics History Blog | November 12, 2009

  8. Thank you for visiting

    Comment by 香港服務器租用公司 | December 17, 2009

  9. welcome to this vist!

    Comment by 香港專業網頁設計公司[ | December 19, 2009


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: