Socio-Economics History Blog

Socio-Economics & History Commentary

Roi Tov: Dismantling Israeli Apartheid !

http://socioecohistory.wordpress.com/2011/03/02/jewish-historian-ilan-pappe-history-of-zionism-genocide-and-ethnic-cleansing-of-palestine/

Genocide and Ethnic Cleansing by Zionist ’666′ Israel !!!

  • Dismantling Israeli Apartheid! 
    by Roi Tov (Jew),
    http://www.roitov.com/
    “Come on! How can you speak of Israeli Apartheid? We are not in the 1990s!” This is what most Israelis will exclaim after seeing the title of this article. Yet, there are two groups of facts that prove them wrong. The first may look outdated, but it is extraordinarily serious. The Israeli collaboration with South Africa’s apartheid was so extensive, that Israel was the only UN member ever to recognize the Bantustans, the black African homeland territories created by the white regime. This was to the extent that, in 1982, the Ciskei Trade Mission opened in Tel Aviv flying its own flag. Israel also held significant relations with KwaZulu and Bophuthatswana. This is even before mentioning the nuclear cooperation between Israel and South Africa; six domestic nuclear devices were destroyed by South Africa following the dismantlement of the apartheid regime. Israel is ruled nowadays by the same regime that held such close relations with the apartheid state without any scruples. The Israeli administration never retracted its relations with the racist South African regime. This first point is just loose change when compared to the second. Looking at the definition of “apartheid” and at the reality in Israel leaves no place for a reasonable doubt: the Israeli discrimination against non-Jewish citizens and denizens living in territories occupied by it, matches one-to-one South African Apartheid.
    -
    South African Apartheid
    The South African Apartheid is so well known that I won’t review it here. Instead, let me state briefly on the key issues relevant to the situation in Israel. “Apartheid” refers to the regime based on racial segregation enforced through legislation by the National Party that ruled South Africa from 1948 to 1994. However, racist laws existed in South Africa even before then. The Hut Tax dates back to 1884 and is considered the first racist law legislated in that country; some of the ugliest racist laws predated the formal Apartheid Period. As commented in the past regarding the legitimacy of the Nazi Regime, all these laws were legislated under a Constitution. Thus, they were considered legitimate by the criminal regime. Invariably, these laws violated human rights sealed as international law under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and thus are not valid. Obeying them transforms one into a collaborator in crime. Israeli schools teach that Germans who didn’t actively oppose the Nazi Regime were also guilty of its crimes, despite the fact that these crimes followed contemporaneous German laws. This paragraph is on the verge of being useless; I just replaced “apartheid” by “racism.” What do these mean?
    -
    Racial segregation is the separation of humans into racial groups; South Africa did that in several ways. The Population Registration Act of 1950 classified denizens into four racial groups: “black”, “white”, “colored”, and “Indian.” The racial identities appeared on their identification cards. The Group Areas Act assigned in the same year different residential regions to different races. In 1953, the Reservation of Separate Amenities Act assigned separated areas to different races in public institutions like hospitals, universities and parks. In that year the Bantu Education Act, which segregated education, was also passed. What distinguishes South African racism is the regime’s fastidiousness with the law. They legislated every tiny aspect of the Apartheid, thinking that this whitewashed their crimes. This is the main difference from Israel.
    -
    Israeli Discrimination
    The assessment that Israel is a racist country is not mine in origin. On November 10, 1975, the United Nations General Assembly adopted Resolution 3379, which ends with an undying truth: “…which most severely condemned Zionism as a threat to world peace and security and called upon all countries to oppose this racist and imperialist ideology, determines that Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination.” Another important text appearing in this resolution is: “international co-operation and peace require the achievement of national liberation and independence, the elimination of colonialism and neo-colonialism, foreign occupation, Zionism, apartheid and racial discrimination in all its forms,…” Almost 35 years later—on October 16, 2009—the same United Nations adopted The Goldstone Report, which condemned Israel on its brutal attack on Gaza. The report defines Israel as a terror-inflicting organization (Article 1690 and others, download here the full text). The brutality of the events described therein—including the illegal bombing of civilians within a hospital with white phosphorous—leaves no place for doubt: despite the cancelation of Resolution 3379 (a blackmailing precondition for the Madrid Conference, see Zion, Sex and Resolution 3379 and White September) Israel didn’t change its attitude. Israel would not have attacked West Bank settlers with white phosphorous, even if they had been persecuting them. Gaza is entirely populated by Palestinians—Jewish Settlements there were dismantled in 2005—and the attack on them had clear racist implications: since the 19th century Zionism silently performs ethnic cleansing. Racism in Israel is as extreme as the South African was, but is slightly different in its machinery.
    -
    Compared to South Africa, the Israeli Administration has an easy task. Israel has no constitution; its government can legislate through the Knesset whatever law it wishes. In the 1990s, Israel’s parliament began to create Basic Laws (note the noncasual similarity with The Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany, expecting them to became the basis for a future constitution. The effort failed. First, they have proven to be easily changeable whenever the largest party wishes to do so. Second, they were never ratified by the citizens. Third, they are incomplete because they ignore Human Rights issues. Moreover, they are often manipulated against basic rights, as the Jewish Fatherland Law has recently proven.
    -
    read more!

 

Revelation 2:9 – …. and I know the blasphemy of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.

“ … it turns out the creation of Israel had not, after all, been a haphazard fight in which the Arabs fled their homes at the directives of their own leaders, but it had been an unprovoked, systematic campaign of ethnic cleansing by the Jewish militia involving massacres, terrorism and the wholesale looting of an entire nation.” - from 4:22 onwards

end

November 1, 2012 - Posted by | GeoPolitics, Social Trends | , , , , , ,

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

« Previous | Next »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 533 other followers

%d bloggers like this: