Socio-Economics History Blog

Socio-Economics & History Commentary

MSM Conditioning Public for “White” Domestic Terrorist with Shootings!

  • Nihilism A diffuse, revolutionary movement of mid 19th-century Russia that scorned authority and tradition and believed in reason, materialism, and radical change in society and government through terrorism and assassination.
    -
    Albert Pike’s Satanic World War 3 Plan 
    …. We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil.
    -
    Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view.
    -
    This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.” 4

end

August 6, 2012 Posted by | GeoPolitics, Social Trends | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Germany Will Die To Make Euro Live!

August 6, 2012 Posted by | Economics, GeoPolitics, Social Trends | , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

‘Scrap Banks or They’ll Bring Chaos’! – Nobel Economist

August 6, 2012 Posted by | Economics, Social Trends | , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Alex Jones: Slaves to The Banksters!

August 6, 2012 Posted by | Economics, GeoPolitics, Social Trends | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Is Saudi Arabia on The Edge of Revolution?

August 6, 2012 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Max Keiser: Occupy Bilderberg & Mainstream Media with Alex Jones!

August 6, 2012 Posted by | Economics, GeoPolitics, Social Trends | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Webster Tarpley: Repressive Al Saud Regime Relic of Feudal Barbarism!

  • Repressive Al Saud regime relic of feudal barbarism! 
    by http://www.presstv.ir/ 
    An American author and historian says the repressive regime of Al Saud is a “relic of feudal barbarism” and one of the “most backward regimes” in the world, Press TV reports.
    -
    “I don’t know how they can do this with a straight face. An absolute monarchy, a relic of feudal barbarism, one of the most backward regimes in the world is going to give lessons to Syria, a much more advanced country,” said Dr. Webster Griffin Tarpley in an interview with Press TV on Saturday, referring to a recent UN resolution on Syria.
    -
    On August 3, the UN General Assembly passed a non-binding resolution on Syria, proposed by Saudi Arabia, which criticized the Security Council and the Syrian government.
    -
    Russia and China condemned the resolution, which was passed by 133 votes to 12 with 31 abstentions, and said it undermined peace efforts.
    -
    Tarpley also stated that the situation in Syria could “get significantly worse and certainly the events at the UN General Assembly now have not helped matters.”
    -
    “I would point out that this resolution was actually… written by Saudi Arabia’s unbelievable piece of hypocrisy.”
    -
    The American author said some of the Persian Gulf Arab monarchs that “have been so eager to meddle and interfere in Syria and other countries, may soon find themselves very busy at home defending the existence of their dynasties, which I think are likely to come under attack as this crisis is driven to a more and more radical form.”

end

August 6, 2012 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

United Nations is a Tool of The West To Control World ! Most Palestinian Children Suffer Shell Shock!

Genocide and Ethnic Cleansing by Zionist ’666′ Israel !!!

August 6, 2012 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Lyndon LaRouche: The Dis-Integration of The Trans-Atlantic World And The Plan for Thermonuclear War!

“The United States will be gone and Europe will crash immediately. The entirety of western and central European nations is presently on the brink of disintegrating! … we will have a chain reaction collapse throughout the planet …” - Lyndon LaRouche, 22:30 onwards

August 6, 2012 Posted by | Economics, GeoPolitics, Social Trends | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

US And Its Allies Setting Stage for Syria Invasion!

  • US and its Allies Setting Stage for Syria Invasion! 
    by Dr. Ismail Salami, http://www.globalresearch.ca/
    The sudden resignation of UN peace envoy Kofi Annan from the peace efforts circle in Syria which evidently materialized under duress from the US government has caused extreme joy in Washington officials who now see this as a sign that the international community is prone to accept that Syrian President Bashar Assad had to go and that the peace efforts would eventually reach a cul-de-sac.
    -
    Likewise, the move has caused frustration in those who had pinned their hopes on the possible fruition of these efforts and those who had been resistant to see Syria as another potential Iraq for US military expeditions.

    -
    The Syrian foreign ministry expressed “regrets” at Annan’s announcement, saying, “The countries seeking to destabilize Syria are the ones that impeded and continue to impede the mission.”
    -
    Russia expressed sorrow over Annan’s departure. Russia’s Ambassador to the United Nations Vitaly Churkin said on Thursday his country regrets Annan’s decision to step down.
    -
    “We understand that it’s his decision,” Churkin told reporters. “We regret that he chose to do so. We have supported very strongly Kofi Annan’s efforts. He has another month to go, and I hope this month is going to be used as effectively as possible under these very difficult circumstances.”
    -
    Besides, Annan’s resignation has afforded Washington and its western allies the latitude to heap blame on China and Russia for what they claim to be an obstruction of democracy in Syria.
    -
    The United States on Thursday blamed China and Russia for the resignation of UN peace envoy Kofi Annan on the refusal of the two countries to back resolutions targeting Syrian President Bashar Assad.
    -
    White House spokesman Jay Carney said, “His resignation highlights the failure in the United Nations Security Council of Russia and China to support meaningful resolutions against Assad that would have held Assad accountable for his failure to abide by the Annan plan.”
    -
    “Those vetoes… were highly regrettable and placed both Russia and China on the wrong side of history and the wrong side of the Syrian people.”
    -
    For its part, Germany on Thursday said Kofi Annan’s resignation was partly due to China and Russia’s opposition to sanctions on the Damascus regime. German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle also said President Bashar Assad had not lived up to its vows to implement Annan’s peace plan.
    -
    “It is clear that Kofi Annan relinquished his mandate in part because of the deadlock in the UN Security Council, of which Russia and China” are permanent members, a statement said. “It is high time that Russia and China stop shielding” Assad, it said.
    -
    Annan’s words upon his abrupt resignation are fraught with secret fear, “When the Syrian people desperately need action, there continues to be finger pointing and name calling in the Security Council,” Annan said. “It is impossible for me or anyone to compel the Syrian government and also the opposition to take the steps to bring about the political process. As an envoy, I can’t want peace more than the protagonists, more than Security Council or the international community, for that matter.”
    -
    Now with Annan’s resignation and the emerging void to be filled by a third party in order to resolve the crisis in Syria, Washington seems to be gaining firm foothold in the Security Council to push for a military invasion.
    -
    British Foreign Secretary William Hague has said the UK will increase the assistance it is giving to Syrian opposition forces in the coming weeks. In other words, the UK has already been giving out financial and military help to the insurgents in Syria. 
    -
    read more!

end

August 6, 2012 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Economist Richard Duncan: Civilization May Not Survive ‘Death Spiral’!

Click on image to see how banks are escalating the collapse…

Warning: Much of what you are about to view has been presented to the United Nations, 16 world governments, and to Fortune 500 companies… but never to the general public. A team of economists, scientists and geopolitical experts has uncovered a startling pattern that has mysteriously appeared and threatens your financial security and way of life!

  • Global economic, financial and currency collapse is coming! Aug-Oct 2012?? (Note: I do not subscribe to the peak oil theory in the above video. Oil is abiotic. Big Oil is controlled/owned by the power elite. They create the artificial scarcity to further their agenda.) Emphasis mine:
    -
    Economist Richard Duncan: Civilization May Not Survive ‘Death Spiral’! 
    By Terry Weiss, Money Morning
    Richard  Duncan, formerly of the World Bank and chief economist at Blackhorse Asset  Mgmt., says America’s $16 trillion federal debt has escalated into a “death spiral, “as he told CNBC.
    -
    And  it could result in a depression so severe that he doesn’t “think our  civilization could survive it.” And Duncan is not alone in warning that the U.S. economy may go into a “death spiral.”
    -
    Since the recession, noted economists including Laurence Kotlikoff, a former member of President Reagan’s Council of Economic Advisers, have come to similar conclusions. Kotlikoff  estimates the true fiscal gap is $211 trillion when unfunded entitlements like  Social Security and Medicare are included.
    -
    However, while the debt crisis numbers are well known to most Americans, the economy  hasn’t suffered a major correction for almost 4 years. So  the questions remain: Is the threat of collapse for real? And if so, when?
    -
    A team of scientists, economists, and geopolitical  analysts believes they have proof that the threat is indeed real – and the  danger imminent. One member of this team, Chris Martenson, a pathologist  and former VP of a Fortune 300 company, explains their findings:
    -
    “We found an identical pattern in our debt, total credit market, and money supply that guarantees they’re going to fail. This pattern is nearly the same as in any pyramid scheme, one that escalates exponentially fast before it collapses. Governments  around the globe are chiefly responsible.
    -
    “And  what’s really disturbing about these findings is that the pattern isn’t limited  to our economy. We found the same catastrophic pattern in our energy, food, and  water systems as well.”
    -
    According  to Martenson: “These systems could all implode at the same time. Food, water,  energy, money. Everything.” Another  member of this team, Keith Fitz-Gerald, the president of The Fitz-Gerald Group,  went on to explain their discoveries.
    -
    “What  this pattern represents is a dangerous countdown clock that’s quickly approaching  zero. And when it does, the resulting chaos is going to crush Americans,”  Fitz-Gerald says.
    -
    Dr.  Kent Moors, an adviser to 16 world governments on energy issues as well as a  member of two U.S. State Department task forces on energy also voiced concerns  over what he and his colleagues uncovered.
    -
    “Most frightening of all is how this exact same pattern keeps  appearing in virtually every system critical to our society and way  of life,” Dr. Moors stated.
    -
    “It’s  a pattern that’s hard to see unless you understand the way a catastrophe like  this gains traction,” Dr. Moors says. “At first, it’s almost impossible to perceive. Everything looks fine, just like in every pyramid  scheme. Yet the insidious growth of the virus keeps doubling in size, over and  over again – in shorter and shorter periods of time – until it hits  unsustainable levels. And it collapses the system.”
    -
    read more!

end

August 6, 2012 Posted by | Economics, GeoPolitics, Social Trends | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Ehud Barak Admits Iran Has Defensive Posture, No Weapons Program!

What is all the BS about Iran being a nuclear threat? It is pure propaganda and outright lies by the Zionists!

  • Zionist ’666′ Israel, the Satanic counterfeit, would like the whole world to believe that Iran, which does not have any nuclear bombs nor a nuclear weapons program, is a nuclear threat to world peace! This is nonsensical propaganda. The threat to world peace is really the genocidal, criminal state: Zionist ’666′ Israel with its 400+ nuclear bombs!
    -
    Ehud Barak Admits Iran Has Defensive Posture, No Weapons Program! 
    by John Glaser, http://antiwar.com/blog 
    The most important and most frequently ignored distinction in the debate about Iran and its nuclear program is that Iran’s current postures are defensive in nature, not offensive. Right-wing pundits constantly harangue about Iran’s supposed intentions to annihilate Israel, wipe Israel off the map, and so on – and this, they claim, is why it’s so important to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon. This assumes Iran would want a nuclear weapon for offensive purposes, which is incorrect.
    -
    Now, US and Israeli intelligence agencies agree that Iran has no nuclear weapons program. But there are aspects of the program, like increased enrichment in recent years, that is meant to place Iran in a technical range of capability, to produce a weapon on short notice if they decide to do so. As has been discussed at Antiwar.com for years, Iran is operating under constant threat from the US and Israel. The US has Iran militarily surrounded, has conducted covert attacks along with Israel, constantly threatens Iran with preemptive military strike, and is heaping harsh economic sanctions. In this environment, Iran has tried to abstain from developing nuclear weapons while having the know-how needed to get there; this essentially is an attempt to have a deterrent without actually having a deterrent. They don’t get in trouble for having a weapon, but they are able to ward off attack or invasion.
    -
    As renowned international relations theorist Kenneth N. Waltz recently wrote in Foreign Affairs, “Such a breakout capability might satisfy the domestic political needs of Iran’s rulers by assuring hard-liners that they can enjoy all the benefits of having a bomb (such as greater security) without the downsides (such as international isolation and condemnation).”
    -
    This distinction is almost always ignored by the pundits and the politicians, despite its supreme importance. But now, one of the most reckless hawks on Iran, Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak, has acknowledged this distinction out loud. Appearing on CNN (via Micah Zenko), Barak admitted that “[Israel and the US] both know that Khamenei did not yet ordered, actually, to give a weapon, but that he is determined to deceit and defy the whole world.” Wolf Blitzer asked, “What does that mean, that the ayatollah has not given the order to build a nuclear bomb?” Barak replied:
    -
    It’s something technical. He did not tell his people start and build it — a weapon on — an explodable device. We think that we understand why he does not give this order.
    -
    He believes that he is penetrated through our intelligence and he strongly feels that if he tries to order, we will know it, we and you and some other intelligence services will know about it and it might end up with a physical action against it.
    -
    So he prefers to, first of all, make sure that through redundancy, through an accumulation of more lowly enriched uranium, more medium level enriched uranium and more centrifuges and more sites, better protection, that he can reach a point, which I call the zone of immunity, beyond which Israel might not be technically capable of launching a surgical operation.
    -
    Here it is admitted that Iran is thinking rationally and defensively. The real concern, Barak says, is allowing Iran to enter a “zone of immunity” wherein it can deter attack or invasion. How dare the ayatollahs deprive Washington and Tel Aviv of the right to attack a weak and defensive Iran!
    -
    The whole story about how ‘we need to attack an aggressive Iran determined to get nuclear weapons’ falls apart under Barak’s admission above. First, if Iran has no nuclear weapons program (something admitted widely in US and Israeli officialdom), then there is no conceivable imminent threat and thus no attack is justified. If Iran is demonstrably intimidated by the threats from the US and Israel – that is, if it is acting defensively vis-a-vis its nuclear program – then current US/Israeli capabilities are proving sufficient to deter an Iranian attack whether it has a bomb or not (As Lt. Gen. Ronald Burgess, director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, told the Senatein February: Iran “is unlikely to initiate or intentionally provoke a conflict or launch a preemptive attack”), and thus an attack is not justified.
    -
    Finally, what the pro-war crowd can’t seem to grasp is that an attack on Iran would be most likely to push them towards reconstituting their nuclear weapons program. As Thomas Pickering, former Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs and former U.S. Ambassador to the UN under George H.W. Bush, warned recently:
    -
    [A military strike] has a very high propensity, in my view, of driving Iran in the direction of openly declaring and deciding, which it has not yet done according to our intelligence, to make a nuclear weapon to seemingly defend itself under what might look to them and others to be an unprovoked attack.
    -
    Iran has great possibilities for asymmetrical reactions including against Israel through Hezbollah and Hamas who have accumulated a large number of missiles. [...] It is a series of potential escalatory possibilities that puts us deep in the potential for another land war in Asia, something that I think we’ve spent the last number of years trying to get out of.
    -
    This has been virtually confirmed after a classified war simulation held a few months back forecasted that a “strike would lead to a wider regional war, which could draw in the United States” and kill many, many people. As Ha’aretz reports, this Congressional Research Service report estimates that Iran could completely recover from a strike on its nuclear program within six months.
    -
    So, seriously, what is driving the ‘bomb Iran’ crowd at this point?
    -
    Update: One commenter has pointed out that having nuclear capability, or ‘know-how’ as I call it, is not an indication of any military dimension to Iran’s program. Indeed, in the same Foreign Affairs piece I quoted above, Ken Waltz explains, “[One] possible outcome is that Iran stops short of testing a nuclear weapon but develops a breakout capability, the capacity to build and test one quite quickly. Iran would not be the first country to acquire a sophisticated nuclear program without building an actual bomb. Japan, for instance, maintains a vast civilian nuclear infrastructure. Experts believe that it could produce a nuclear weapon on short notice.”

Revelation 2:9 – …. and I know the blasphemy of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.

by Warner D. Farr, LTC, U.S. Army, http://www.au.af.mil/

“Iran doesn’t frighten me and I don’t think it should frighten the American people. They don’t have a bomb. They haven’t made a decision to build one. They don’t have the means to deliver one. And the Israelis have 300 atomic bombs! I mean who presents the existential threat to whom?” - Pat Buchanan (7:58 onwards)

end

August 6, 2012 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Webster G. Tarpley: Criminal Banking Cartel Dominates US, British Governments!

  • Criminal banking cartel dominates US, British governments! 
    by Webster G. Tarpley, http://www.presstv.ir/ 
    A series of enormous financial scandals over the past few months provides new proof of the existence of an international banking cartel in the form of an ongoing criminal enterprise devoted to market manipulation, money laundering and embezzlement, and enjoying the collusion of the US and British governments at the highest level. The LIBOR scandal may well represent the biggest corruption case in the history of the world.  Every morning at 11 a.m. UK time, 16 leading banks operating in the City of London report, under the auspices of the British Bankers’ Association, the rate of interest that they would expect to pay to borrow money from another bank.  Of these 16 numbers, the four highest and the four lowest are removed from consideration, and the remaining eight are averaged together. 
    -
    The result is LIBOR, meaning the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate, which is published by Thomson Reuters at 11:30 a.m. London time, and which represents the main point of reference for short-term interest rates around the world.  The interest rates paid on almost $1 quadrillion ($1,000 trillion) of Eurodollar contracts, interest rate swaps, and various other derivatives are based directly on LIBOR.  This entire process is almost completely unregulated by government agencies, relying instead on the word of honor of bankers who have repeatedly shown that they are predators and liars.
    -
    The banks taking part in the LIBOR fixing include Barclays, Royal Bank of Scotland, HSBC, Lloyds Bank TSB (which absorbed HBOS in January 2009), Bank of America, Citigroup, J.P. Morgan Chase, UBS, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Westdeutsche Landesbank, Société Générale of France, Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UJF, Norinchukin of Japan, Royal Bank of Canada, and Rabobank of the Netherlands.  The list of LIBOR participants is actually a membership list of the world’s “too big to fail”  banking cartel of the most powerful – and the most insolvent – financial faction on the planet.
    -
    As early as 2007, Deputy Governor Paul Tucker of the Bank Of England was aware that some banks were reporting that they could borrow money at interest rates which were much lower than what they were really forced to pay.  These banks were trying to conceal how close to bankruptcy they actually were, in the hopes of avoiding panic withdrawals by depositors.  Sometimes, banks attempted to drive LIBOR up because of certain speculative positions they had taken. International financial authorities like the International Monetary Fund and the Bank for International Settlements attempted to cover up the scandal, but it finally exploded into public view in March 2012.
    -
    Evidence in the form of e-mails showing a conspiracy to manipulate LIBOR emerged first in regard to Barclays Bank, which was fined $200 million by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission, $160 million by the US Department of Justice, and 60,000,000 Pounds by the British Financial Services Authority.  Barclays Chairman Marcus Agius was forced to quit, as was Chief Executive Officer Robert Diamond.  But there were no criminal charges. 
    -
    Timothy Geithner, who is currently Obama’s Secretary of the Treasury, was in 2008 the head of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the flagship of the US Federal Reserve System.  Geithner’s testimony at congressional hearings showed that he had done nothing to stop the criminal abuse of LIBOR, but he attempted to escape responsibility by saying it was up to the British to take the lead.  Most importantly, no US or British official did anything to warn the public about the biggest financial fraud of all time.  The central banks and government agencies, which are supposed to act as regulators, have all been captured and put into the service of the banks they are supposed to be overseeing.
    -
    It is impossible to imagine that Barclays Bank acted alone. Because of the way the LIBOR process is structured, a single bank cannot hope to manipulate the rate.  Therefore, there had to be a conspiracy embracing most or all of the 16 LIBOR banks.
    -
    read more!

end

August 6, 2012 Posted by | Economics, Social Trends | , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Central Bankers Agenda: Obama Sanctions Against Iran Over Gold And The Dollar as World Reserve Currency!

Stop the war!

  • Emphasis mine:
    -
    Central Bankers Agenda: Obama Sanctions Against Iran Over Gold ! 
    by Susanne Posel,  Occupy Corporatism
    Last month, President Obama placed more stringent sanctions on Iran’s oil sales and financial transactions. And in the next breath, he claimed that because Iran is supposedly developing a nuclear weapon, Obama will “once again reaffirming [the US government’s] commitment to hold the Iranian government accountable for its actions.”
    -
    While Israel is threatening to attack Iran pre-emptively to “knock out” nuclear facilities, Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli Prime Minister asserts that “all the sanctions and diplomacy so far have not set back the Iranian (nuclear) program by one iota And that’s why I believe that we need a strong and credible military threat coupled with the sanctions to have a chance to change that situation.”
    -
    Sanctions placed against Iran are directed at their economy and value of their currency because Iran has been using gold instead of the US dollar to trade with other nations for their oil.
    -
    Obama’s latest round of sanctions, by executive order, is aimed at preventing “payment mechanisms for the purchase of Iranian oil to circumvent existing sanctions.” By targeting specific banks, Bank of Kunlun of China and Elaf Islamic Bank of Iraq, Obama wants to make sure “transactions worth millions of dollars on behalf of Iranian banks that are subject to sanctions for their links to Iran’s illicit proliferation activities.”
    -
    Obama warned that the US will “expose any financial institution, no matter where they are located, that allows the increasingly desperate Iranian regime to retain access to the international financial system.”
    -
    Working for the banking Elite, Obama has made his position clear. He is using the might of the US military to stop Iran from further devaluation of the US dollar; and now threatening all other financial institutions and nations that deal with Iran or facilitate payment in any currency other than the US dollar.
    -
    Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s Supreme Leader, believes that US will declare “war within weeks”. Khamenei said: “While retaliation had been exhaustively drilled in regular military exercises in the past year, Khamenei ordered the biggest fortification project in Iran’s history to save its nuclear program from even the mightiest of America’s super-weapons. Rocks are being gathered from afar, piled on key nuclear installations, covered with many tons of poured concrete and finally plated with steel.”
    -
    Iran’s plan to close the Strait of Hormuz is a strategic response to the US by cutting off 33% of the world’s shipments of oil. It was met with underwater drones that targeted the blockade. As well as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates opening pipelines to bypass the Strait in efforts to increase oil that is moved out of the region.
    -
    Last month, reports of war games began surfacing. The Israeli Air Force is practicing aerial combat maneuvers with the US, NATO and European armed forces. They are collaborating on potential strike zones; mainly focusing on Iran’s nuclear facilities.
    -
    Joe Biden, US vice-president confirmed that the US would not “stand in the way” of Israel’s attack on Iran. “The US cannot dictate to another sovereign nation what they can and cannot do. Israel can determine for itself – it’s a sovereign nation – what’s in their interest and what they decide to do relative to Iran and anyone else.”
    -
    Ephraim Halevy, former Israeli spy, warns that Iran should take Israel seriously – that they have every intention of striking and that the “next 12 weeks are very critical”. Netanyahu, fearing that the newly elected president will not want to have a winter war, wants to attack before the elections season begins in the US.
    -
    In globalist speak this is just rhetoric, as the plan to invade Iran centers around the global reserve currency and not nuclear facilities. Whether or not Obama is re-elected is irrelevant if the US dollar is further compromised by the actions of nations using gold as currency.

Why is genocidal madman Netanyahu screaming for war with Iran? It is all about the global petrodollar hegemony all about the coming Luciferian New World Order!

Zionists-NeoCons have been lying about Iran for the better part of 25 years!

Revelation 2:9 – …. and I know the blasphemy of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.

end

August 6, 2012 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Should Obama And Congress Be Arrested Under The NDAA? For Supporting Al Qaeda!

  • Should Obama and Congress Be Arrested Under the NDAA? 
    by http://azizonomics.com/ 
    Should President Obama (alongside Lindsay Graham and John McCain) be wearing an orange jumpsuit?
    Welcome to the beautiful and surreal reality of life under American corporatism, under a Congress that churns out thousands  and thousands of pages of (often contradictory) legislation a year.
    -
    If providing material assistance to al-Qaeda is illegal under the National Defence Authorization Act (2012), and Obama and Congress are sending $25 million of aid to al-Qaeda-affiliated Syrian opposition, aren’t Congress and President Obama violating their own law? Should Obama (or at least the Justice Department) not be using “all necessary and appropriate force” including “the power to indefinitely detain” to prevent Obama and Congress from assisting al-Qaeda? Did anyone in Congress or the Obama administration even bother to read the law that they were signing? Do Federal laws no longer apply to lawmakers?
    -
    The only question left from this abrupt and absurd turnaround — from funding bin Laden’s mujahideen thirty years ago, to ten years ago declaring war on al-Qaeda, to today sending them material assistance — would appear to be whether or not Obama will pull a 1984 and claim that “we have always been at war with Eurasia“.

end

August 6, 2012 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 533 other followers