Bix Weir: $1,000/oz Silver Is Conservative?! Anatomy of a Silver Short Squeeze!
- The game is up for the bullion banksters. Their silver and gold raids for the past few weeks have failed spectacularly! Everybody and their dog seem to be waiting to buy silver every time the bullion banksters bring prices down!
Anatomy of a short squeeze
by Alasdair Macleod
The shortage of gold and silver is the driving force behind the bull markets in these metals. Quite simply, the outstanding obligations in these commodities exceed the stock available. I vividly recall a rare example of a similar situation during my stockbroking days, which will serve to illustrate this point.
In the UK’s property crash of 1974, the shares of property companies fell by as much as 90%, but one share that resisted this trend was London Bridge Securities. LBS shares remained stubbornly high, because as it turned out, the directors and their cronies were buying them. Eventually, however, they were swamped by short-sellers, and the share price fell heavily. The directors of London Bridge Securities then realised that they and their friends owned more than 100% of the company. This state of affairs arose because the short-sellers were unable to deliver any scrip, and none of the existing shareholders were prepared to lend them any. The result was a buying-in procedure involving an auction on the floor of the stock exchange, where the price was bid up to a level where holders of the shares were prepared to sell.
The short was closed out at about three times the share price of earlier that morning. The squeeze on the bear position had nothing to do with the company’s underlying value: it occurred because one big speculator got into an impossible position that had to be resolved. And that more or less is where gold and silver appear to be today.
Silver offers the closer parallel with the London Bridge example. There are a few banks with large short positions in silver on the US futures market in quantities that simply cannot be covered by physical stock. The outstanding obligations are far larger than the stock available. The lesson from the London Bridge example is that prices in a bear squeeze can go far higher than anyone reasonably thinks possible. The short position in gold is less visible, being mainly in the unallocated accounts of the bullion banks operating in the LBMA market. But it is there nonetheless, and the bullion banks’ obligations to their bullion-unallocated account holders are far greater than the bullion they actually hold.
But there is one vital difference between my example from the property market of 1974 and gold and silver today. The bear who got caught short of London Bridge Securities was right in principal, because LBS went bust shortly afterwards; but in the case of gold and silver, the acceleration of monetary inflation is underwriting rising prices for both metals, making the position of the bears increasingly exposed as time marches on.
Perhaps the most important lesson we can learn from the LBS situation – and highly applicable to the situation today in precious metals, which could be developing into the largest short squeeze in history – is that very few other people in the investment community actually understand what is happening. This is something to bear in mind when taking investment advice.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.