The Great Sea-Level Humbug! There Is No Alarming Sea Level Rise!

One of the approximately 1,190 beautiful coral islands that comprise the nation of the Maldives. As Mörner shows, the Maldives are not in danger of inundation.

• Man made global warming is a hoax perpetrated by the Illuminist ruling class and their global organizations, as a means of creating global government. They create/invent global problems so that their drive for a Luciferian New World Order is easier!
   
  “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. In their totality and in their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat with demands the solidarity of all peoples. But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap about which we have already warned namely mistaking systems for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.“
  “The First Global Revolution”, A Report by the Council of the Club of Rome by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider 1991.
   
• This is what renowned oceanographic expert Nils-Axel Mörner says:
   
  THE GREAT SEA-LEVEL HUMBUG
  There Is No Alarming Sea Level Rise!
  In an interview and paper published in 21st Century in 2007, I have shown that globalsea level is not in an alarming rising mode, which is the main threat in the International Panel on Climate Change scenario. If sea level is not rising at a high rate, there is no serious threat and no real problem. In subsequent papers, I continued to present new data on sea level stability. In Mörner 2007b, our field observational database from the Maldive Islands was described in detail. A new study in Bangladesh was published in 2010 (Mörner 2010a). New data with respect to general sea level changes were published in another paper (2010b). Also, my short sea level booklet titled “The Greatest Lie Ever Told” (Mörner 2007c) was updated in new editions in 2009 and 2010.
   
  Here I will investigate the proposed rates of sea level changes by IPCC and others. Figure 1 illustrates the differences between the IPCC models and the observational facts. After 1965, the two curves start to diverge significantly (the area marked with a question mark). This paper will highlight the differences and seek the solution of what data to trust and what to discard. Figure 2 shows the spectrum of present-day sea level estimates. The proposed rates of sea level rise range from 0.0 to 3.2 mm per year. Obviously, all these rates cannot be correct. I will try to straighten out the question mark in Figure 1 by undertaking a critical examination of the rates given in Figure 2.
   
  Observational Facts
  Clear observational measurements in the field indicate that sea level is not rising in the Maldives, Bangladesh, Tuvalu, Vanuatu, and French Guyana (Mörner, 2007a, 2007b, 2007c, 2010a, 2010b). All these places are key sites in the sea level debate, where the IPCC and its ideological associates have predicted terrible flooding scenarios. The reality is totally different from what the IPCC claims, however, as highlighted in my interview and article in 21st Century.The IPCC group and the Presidents of the Maldives and Tuvalu continue to claim that the flooding is in progress, and will soon flood the islands and wipe those island nations off the surface of the globe (or rather ocean). Already here we are facing a behavior that well might be termed a “sea-level-gate.” In an open letter to the President of the Maldives (Mörner 2009), I addressed the divergence between his claim and our field observations. No reply has come.
   
  Bangladesh is a nation cursed by disasters—heavy precipitation in the Himalayas and coastal cyclones. As if this were not bad enough, it has been claimed that sea level is in rapidly rising mode. This claim has been totally discredited by my study in the Sundarban area, where the facts are that the sea has remained stable for the last 40-50 years (Mörner  2010a).
   
  The erroneously inferred sea level rise has been used to create wild scenarios where it is claimed that tens to hundreds of thousands of people may be drowned and “millions of individuals will be displaced from their homes over the course of the century due to sea-level rise” (Byravana and Raja 2010). This is, indeed, a terrible falsification of the actual situation. We are undoubtedly facing a “sea-level-gate.” The journal that published this false claim, Ethics and International Affairs, refuses to print a comment “that focuses on empirical data.” With surprise, we must ask: What is the meaning of addressing moral concern, if the entire empirical base is wrong?
   
  …for the full report click here!

end