Depleted Uranium: A Strange Way To Protect Libyan Civilians!
“All war is based on deception.” – Sun Tzu, The Art of War
- The western invasion of Libya has already begun. UK, SAS and SBS troops have been on Libyan soil for the past many weeks. This is war against Libya using humanitarian aid as a false pretext.
British special forces already deep inside Libya… and more are ready to be deployed. Squadron of SAS and SBS troops have been in country for a month
… While Chancellor George Osborne repeated that UK ground troops would not be involved, the Daily Mail can reveal there are an estimated 350 already mounting covert operations. In total it is understood that just under 250 UK special forces soldiers and their support have been in Libya since before the launch of air strikes to enforce the no-fly zone against Gaddafi’s forces.
The troops in Libya were drawn from a squadron of SAS and SBS personnel, some who have been in the country for a month and are being re-supplied with water, food and ammunition via airdrops from Cyprus. Those numbers were further boosted by nearly 100 this week when paratroopers from the Special Forces Support Group (SFSG) were sent to Libya as coalition commanders prepare to increase the tempo of operations.
- Libya is really about oil. The country will end up like Iraq: bombed to bits and contaminated with Depleted Uranium.
Depleted Uranium: A Strange Way To Protect Libyan Civilians
by David Wilson, Stop the War Coalition
“[Depleted uranium tipped missiles] fit the description of a dirty bomb in every way… I would say that it is the perfect weapon for killing lots of people.” ~ Marion Falk, chemical physicist (retd), Lawrence Livermore Lab, California, USA
In the first 24 hours of the Libyan attack, US B-2s dropped forty-five 2,000-pound bombs. These massive bombs, along with the Cruise missiles launched from British and French planes and ships, all contained depleted uranium (DU) warheads.
DU is the waste product from the process of enriching uranium ore. It is used in nuclear weapons and reactors. Because it is a very heavy substance, 1.7 times denser than lead, it is highly valued by the military for its ability to punch through armored vehicles and buildings. When a weapon made with a DU tip strikes a solid object like the side of a tank, it goes straight through it, then erupts in a burning cloud of vapor. The vapor settles as dust, which is not only poisonous, but also radioactive.
An impacting DU missile burns at 10,000 degrees C. When it strikes a target, 30% fragments into shrapnel. The remaining 70% vaporises into three highly-toxic oxides, including uranium oxide. This black dust remains suspended in the air and, according to wind and weather, can travel over great distances. If you think Iraq and Libya are far away, remember that radiation from Chernobyl reached Wales.
Particles less than 5 microns in diameter are easily inhaled and may remain in the lungs or other organs for years. Internalized DU can cause kidney damage, cancers of the lung and bone, skin disorders, neurocognitive disorders, chromosome damage, immune deficiency syndromes and rare kidney and bowel diseases. Pregnant women exposed to DU may give birth to infants with genetic defects. Once the dust has vaporised, don’t expect the problem to go away soon. As an alpha particle emitter, DU has a half life of 4.5 billion years.
In the ‘shock and awe’ attack on Iraq, more than 1,500 bombs and missiles were dropped on Baghdad alone. Seymour Hersh has claimed that the US Third Marine Aircraft Wing alone dropped more than “five hundred thousand tons of ordnance”. All of it DU-tipped.
Al Jazeera reported that invading US forces fired two hundred tons of radioactive material into buildings, homes, streets and gardens of Baghdad. A reporter from the Christian Science Monitor took a Geiger counter to parts of the city that had been subjected to heavy shelling by US troops. He found radiation levels 1,000 to 1,900 times higher than normal in residential areas. With its population of 26 million, the US dropped a one-ton bomb for every 52 Iraqi citizens or 40 pounds of explosives per person.
William Hague has said that we are in Libya ” to protect civilians and civilian-populated areas”.You don’t have to look far for who and what are being ‘protected’.
In that first 24 hours the ‘Allies’ ‘expended’ £100 million on DU-tipped ordnance. The European Union’s arms control report said member states issued licences in 2009 for the sale of £293.2 million worth of weapons and weapons systems to Libya. Britain issued arms firms licences for the sale of £21.7 million worth of weaponry to Libya and were also paid by Colonel Gadaffi to send the SAS to train his 32nd Brigade.
For the next 4.5 billion years, I’ll bet that William Hague will not be holidaying in North Africa.
end
HAARP Magnetometer Data Shows Japan Earthquake Was Induced !
- Truth is stranger than fiction. I no longer use the term: ‘Act of God’ for alot of earthquakes and natural disasters. Closer examination of many typhoons show that they are very likely man-made. The typhoon Nargis(2008) which struck Myanmar and Katrina which struck the Gulf coast USA are IMO man-made. Was Japan hit by a tectonic weapon on 3/11/11? Very likely!
HAARP Magnetometer data shows Japan earthquake was induced.
by PC, www.presscore.ca
The United States Air Force and Navy has provided a visual insight into what caused the 9.0 magnitude off of Japan on March 11, 2011 at 05:46:23 UTC. The image above was downloaded from the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) website. It is a time-frequency spectrogram, which shows the frequency content of signals recorded by the HAARP Induction Magnetometer. This instrument, provided by the University of Tokyo, measures temporal variations in the geomagnetic field (Earth’s magnetosphere) in the ULF (ultra-low frequency) range of 0-5 Hz. Notions have been added to the image to show you what was happening the day the Japan earthquake and tsunami struck.
By looking at the accompanying HAARP spectrum chart above you can see when the 9.0 magnitude earthquake struck – red line drawn vertically – and what was happening before and after the earthquake. What you can also see is a constant ULF frequency of 2.5 Hz being recorded by the magnetometer. The ULF 2.5 Hz frequency is evidence of an induced earthquake. The chart recorded this constant before, during and after the 9.0 magnitude earthquake struck. On March 11, 2011 the 2.5 Hz ULF frequency was being emitted and recorded from 0:00 hours to about 10:00 hours – or for 10 hours. We know for a fact that the Japan earthquake lasted only a few minutes so why was the earthquake signature frequency (2.5 Hz) being recorded for 10 hours on the morning of March 11, 2011? Because a HAARP phased array antenna system was broadcasting (transmitting) the 2.5Hz ULF frequency and it triggered the Japan earthquake and ensuing tsunami.
If you go to HAARP’s official website you can see for yourself that the 2.5 Hz ULF frequency wasn’t only being broadcated for 10 hours, it was constantly being broadcasted for 2 days prior to the earthquake. Broadcasting began on March 8, 2011, just before midnight as you can see on HAARP’s website page – http://maestro.haarp.alaska.edu/cgi-bin/scmag/disp-scmag.cgi?20110308. Click on the Next Day link to see that the earthquake inducing 2.5 Hz ULF frequency was being broadcasted for the entire days of March 9, 2011 and March 10, 2011. Even though the signature frequency of an earthquake was shown throughout March 9 and March 10 there were no constant earthquakes occurring off the east coast of Japan.
What is the significance of a 2.5 Hz ULF broadcast? The natural resonance of an earthquake is 2.5 Hz. Scientists working for the United States military discovered this using the phased array antennas at the HAARP facility in Alaska. HAARP’s own charts suggests that earthquakes occurred constantly for 3 days. We know for a fact that they haven’t.
The HAARP magnetometer data provides proof that the Japan earthquake was not a naturally occurring quake – it was triggered. This data shows us that a HAARP military installation was broadcasting the known earthquake signature frequency in order to trigger a major earthquake. The broadcast was most likely being transmitted from a floating HAARP system like the floating Sea-Based X-Band Radar platform that can be moved anywhere in the Pacific or Atlantic ocean under the protection of a carrier strike group – like the USS Ronald Regan. Where was the USS Ronald Reagan on the morning of March 11, 2011? According to a Stars & Stripes March 9, 2011 report – Reagan carrier group steams toward South Korea to join exercise
Evidence or Conspiracy theory?
Is this evidence or just a bunch of nonsense attached to a baseless conspiracy theory and recklessly made public by a crackpot? The above image is of the HAARP Sea-Based X-Band Radar (SBX) platform which does exist – not a conspiracy theory. The preceding link is to the United States Navy website. What is sitting on top of the deck of the SBX is a phased array antenna – a key component of the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) GMD system – clearly not a conspiracy theory.
The military vessel includes power plant, a bridge, control rooms, living quarters, storage areas and the infrastructure necessary to support the massive X-band radar. The SBX radar is the most sophisticated phased array, electro-mechanically steered X-band radar in the world – according to Boeing claims. The phased array antenna consists of thousands of antennas driven by transmit/receive modules. The radar is designed and built by Raytheon Integrated Defense Systems for Boeing, the prime contractor on the project for the United States Missile Defense Agency (MDA). Boeing, Raytheon and MDA exists – also not a conspiracy theory.
HAARP does exists. The HAARP program is no secret. Their own website states that: The HAARP program is committed to developing a world class ionospheric research facility consisting of: The Ionospheric Research Instrument (IRI), a high power transmitter facility operating in the High Frequency (HF) range. The IRI will be used to temporarily excite a limited area of the ionosphere for scientific study. Even World renowned Stanford University knows about and publishes reports on the activities at the HAARP installations – Experiments with the HAARP Ionospheric Heater – http://vlf.stanford.edu/research/experiments-haarp-ionospheric-heater. According to Stanford -
The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) facility is located in Gakona, Alaska at 62.39º N, 145.15º W, near mile 11 of the Tok Cutoff Highway. The facility houses many diagnostic instruments for studying the ionosphere, but the highlight is the HF transmitter array. This array consists of 15×12 crossed dipole antennas, which together can transmit a total of 3600kW of RF power at frequencies from 2.8 – 10 MHz (HF, high frequency range). This power is partially absorbed by the ionosphere, and though only a tiny fraction of the power it naturally receives from the sun, can still produce subtle changes that can be detected with sensitive instruments.
The VLF group focuses on using HAARP to generate ELF and VLF waves through a process called modulated heating. Such experiments have been conducted since 1999.
- See also:
European Parliament Issues Warnings on HAARP!
Scientist Leuren Moret: Japan Earthquake, Nuke “Accident” Are Tectonic (HAARP) Nuclear Warfare! Illuminati Card Game, ‘Combined Disaster’ Card Shows It Was A Planned Disaster!
Was The Earthquake And Tsunami in Japan Caused By HAARP?
HAARP Tectonic Weapon Caused ChristChurch, New Zealand Earthquake?
Colin Andrews: Seen on Radar By Thousands Over Australia! HAARP Radar Signatures?!
Have Scientists Discovered How to Create Downpours in The Desert?
Andrew Johnson: Chemtrails, Weather Modification & Climate Change!
Weather Wars and the Devil’s HAARP!
Project BlueBeam Grand Deception, HAARP And Anomalous Earthquakes of Past Few Years!
Climate Weapons: More Than Just a Conspiracy Theory?!
HAARP Cloud Signatures!
Jim Marrs: New World Order, ‘Nazification’ of America, Man Made Diseases, HAARP, Chemtrails, Alien Agenda and More…..
David Icke: Assassination of Polish Elite, HAARP and Haiti Earthquake!
Brooks Agnew: HAARP, Earthquakes in SzeChuan China and Haiti!
Cloud ?? HAARP ?? or UFO Sighting Caught On Tape Chile 2/26/2010 !
Chile Quake Eyewitness “I saw the Sky Changing Colors!” . HAARP At Work??
Holes In Heaven: HAARP and Advances in Tesla Technology ! Mind Control, Weather Modification and Warfare!
HR 2995 Weather Modification Research ….. Act of 2005! United Nations 1976 Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques !
HAARP Has Deleted Its Records From 2010-1-11.
Russian Navy: The U.S. Created The Earthquake In Haiti!
Flashback 2003: HAARP Poses Global Threat !
A Few Weather Modification Radar Signatures!
Lt. Col. Tom Bearden: Weather Modification & Energy Weapons ! The Science Behind It!
Weather Modification Radar Signatures
FlashBack: Professor Chossudovsky on Weather Warfare!
Haiti Killer Quake Caused By Scalar Weapon !
Chavez: US Weapon Test Caused Haiti Earthquake !
HAARP: The Earthquake Weapon? Weather Modification Using HAARP.
The Militarization of Emergency Aid to Haiti: Is it a Humanitarian Operation or an Invasion?
Nick Begich: Mind Control – The Rise of Invasive and Oppressive Technology!
Jesse Ventura: HAARP – Weather Modification, Military Defence and Mind Control!
Military Use of Mind Control Weapons
Nick Begich: HAARP, Weather Control and Mind Control
Mind Control: The Ultimate Brave New World by Dr. Nick Begich
Weather Warfare Weapons – Part 1
Weather Warfare Weapons – Part 2
end
The Great Sea-Level Humbug! There Is No Alarming Sea Level Rise!
One of the approximately 1,190 beautiful coral islands that comprise the nation of the Maldives. As Mörner shows, the Maldives are not in danger of inundation.
- Man made global warming is a hoax perpetrated by the Illuminist ruling class and their global organizations, as a means of creating global government. They create/invent global problems so that their drive for a Luciferian New World Order is easier!
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. In their totality and in their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat with demands the solidarity of all peoples. But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap about which we have already warned namely mistaking systems for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.“
“The First Global Revolution”, A Report by the Council of the Club of Rome by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider 1991.
- This is what renowned oceanographic expert Nils-Axel Mörner says:
THE GREAT SEA-LEVEL HUMBUG
There Is No Alarming Sea Level Rise!
In an interview and paper published in 21st Century in 2007, I have shown that globalsea level is not in an alarming rising mode, which is the main threat in the International Panel on Climate Change scenario. If sea level is not rising at a high rate, there is no serious threat and no real problem. In subsequent papers, I continued to present new data on sea level stability. In Mörner 2007b, our field observational database from the Maldive Islands was described in detail. A new study in Bangladesh was published in 2010 (Mörner 2010a). New data with respect to general sea level changes were published in another paper (2010b). Also, my short sea level booklet titled “The Greatest Lie Ever Told” (Mörner 2007c) was updated in new editions in 2009 and 2010.
Here I will investigate the proposed rates of sea level changes by IPCC and others. Figure 1 illustrates the differences between the IPCC models and the observational facts. After 1965, the two curves start to diverge significantly (the area marked with a question mark). This paper will highlight the differences and seek the solution of what data to trust and what to discard. Figure 2 shows the spectrum of present-day sea level estimates. The proposed rates of sea level rise range from 0.0 to 3.2 mm per year. Obviously, all these rates cannot be correct. I will try to straighten out the question mark in Figure 1 by undertaking a critical examination of the rates given in Figure 2.
Observational Facts
Clear observational measurements in the field indicate that sea level is not rising in the Maldives, Bangladesh, Tuvalu, Vanuatu, and French Guyana (Mörner, 2007a, 2007b, 2007c, 2010a, 2010b). All these places are key sites in the sea level debate, where the IPCC and its ideological associates have predicted terrible flooding scenarios. The reality is totally different from what the IPCC claims, however, as highlighted in my interview and article in 21st Century.The IPCC group and the Presidents of the Maldives and Tuvalu continue to claim that the flooding is in progress, and will soon flood the islands and wipe those island nations off the surface of the globe (or rather ocean). Already here we are facing a behavior that well might be termed a “sea-level-gate.” In an open letter to the President of the Maldives (Mörner 2009), I addressed the divergence between his claim and our field observations. No reply has come.
Bangladesh is a nation cursed by disasters—heavy precipitation in the Himalayas and coastal cyclones. As if this were not bad enough, it has been claimed that sea level is in rapidly rising mode. This claim has been totally discredited by my study in the Sundarban area, where the facts are that the sea has remained stable for the last 40-50 years (Mörner 2010a).
The erroneously inferred sea level rise has been used to create wild scenarios where it is claimed that tens to hundreds of thousands of people may be drowned and “millions of individuals will be displaced from their homes over the course of the century due to sea-level rise” (Byravana and Raja 2010). This is, indeed, a terrible falsification of the actual situation. We are undoubtedly facing a “sea-level-gate.” The journal that published this false claim, Ethics and International Affairs, refuses to print a comment “that focuses on empirical data.” With surprise, we must ask: What is the meaning of addressing moral concern, if the entire empirical base is wrong?
…for the full report click here!
end
About
Societal and economics observer and commentator with an endtimes, future history perspective. Follow me at Twitter: socioecohistory
