Socio-Economics History Blog

Socio-Economics & History Commentary

Iran’s Nuclear Program: Iran Truthful, in Treaty Compliance; US/Israel Lying, in Treaty Violation! False Flag, Lies and Nuclear Bombs!

  • The usual amount of propaganda, dis-information and mis-information are growing. I have no doubt that my site will be targeted. Let me just say that for every attack by all these dis-information specialists, I intend to reply 10 fold with truth! Truth matters! We do not need this war with Iran. Do you actually believe George Bush about Iraq and WMD? Lies and more lies are escalating to drive the sheeple to support this coming war. We need to counteract and do so quickly.
     
  • The Examiner.com opines :
      
    The title is of this article is alarming, and accurate. It will brief you on:
     
    ·        the treaty that manages Iran’s nuclear program,
    ·        the status of compliance with Iran, the US with the UK and now France, and Israel,
    ·        analysis for the disinformation delivered by the US, UK, France, Israel.
     
    The treaty in question: The Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT): The Non-Proliferation Treaty    [1](NPT) was designed to limit nuclear weapon development, facilitate availability of nuclear energy, and lead to global nuclear disarmament. The treaty allows any country to develop nuclear material for energy, receive the assistance of the nuclear countries to do so (US, UK, France, Russia, and China), and then be inspected by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to verify they do not refine fissionable material beyond energy-grade (3-5%) to weapons-grade (over 85%). To date, no NPT country with a nuclear energy program has developed nuclear weapons. Iran and the US are signatories of NPT. Therefore, the legal and Constitutional US response is to help Iran develop nuclear energy.
     
    Status of compliance: You need three brief paragraphs of history to put the present into context: in 1953, the United States CIA, led by one of President Theodore Roosevelt’s grandsons, initiated a coup in Iran (Operation Ajax    [2]) to remove the democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh. The Iranian government was understandably dissatisfied with the terms of its contract with the Anglo-Persian Oil Company that allowed British interests to claim 85% of the oil profit from Iran.[3]Iran voted to nationalize the oil industry in 1951 after the British declined to renegotiate the terms. The US-led coup was successful, and the royal monarch, Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi,[4]became virtual dictator. Fearing popular reprisal, Pahlavi’s government was supported by the CIA in creating the Iranian SAVAK, a vicious secret police for the Shah’s dictatorial government.[5] We can only assume that the oil revenue sharing agreement with the Shah was acceptable to the US and UK.
     
    Under the Eisenhower administration, the US cooperated with the Shah’s government for the development of Iranian nuclear energy through the “Atoms for Peace” program.    [6] President Ford agreed to US full cooperation to help Iran build about two dozen nuclear energy plants. When the Iranian people overthrew the Shah’s government in 1979, the US stopped cooperating. The US backed Iraq in their invasion of Iran in 1980 and throughout the war until 1988, seeking a more US-friendly Iranian government. The US provided Saddam Hussein with chemical and biological weapons to use against Iran that the W. Bush administration later used as justification for invading Iraq.[7]Since 1979, the US has worked to prevent Iran having a nuclear energy program, even under the legal provisions of the NPT, and reneged on a multi-billion dollar contract to deliver nuclear fuel to Iran without refunding Iran’s money.[8]
     
    Therefore, all US administrations since Carter in 1979 have committed lies of omission by not disclosing to the public Iran’s treaty-right to nuclear energy under NPT. US political “leadership” obfuscates the issue with rhetoric of Iran’s “nuclear program” to link energy with weapons.    [9]Ironically, the US is in additional violation of NPT by developing new nuclear weapons and threatening to use them rather than work for global disarmament as per treaty terms.[10] The US actions are also in violation of the UN Charter in threatening war.[11]
     
    The UK and France are out of NPT compliance by not assisting Iran for nuclear energy development and then accepting the reasonable terms of full monitoring of nuclear refinement that has had a perfect history for safety and compliance for over 40 years. Israel is not signatory to NPT; they ironically choose what they accuse of Iran: a secret nuclear weapons program estimated at 200 warheads. Israel has also been     found by the UN’s Human Rights Council to be in numerous violations of War Crimes against Gaza. 
     
    The previous three paragraphs are plain vanilla history in conservatively-known content. This means it is encyclopedic and not disputed by government or argued by historians. It should be clear to you that “leadership” from both political parties and mainstream media do not provide the necessary context of history and treaty facts to evaluate the Bush and Obama administrations’ statements threatening war with Iran. Their collective use of the term “nuclear program” is intentionally conflating the two distinct technologies of legal low-grade energy refinement with illegal very high-grade weapons refinement. We could also call it fraud, as it deliberately misinforms.    [12]
     
    Iran is in compliance of NPT by having all facilities disclosed and open for IAEA monitoring. On Monday September 21, 2009 Iran disclosed to IAEA per NPT terms of 180 day notification of a new nuclear energy facility that is about 18 months away from operation. For discussion, read     here. 
     
    Analysis: I’ll give you two paragraphs of recent history, then current analysis. Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, Seymour Hersh, has reported since 2005 that government insiders have disclosed to him that the CIA is presently engaged in covert operations similar to 1953 to overthrow the Iranian government.    [13]Hersh, claiming inside White House sources, reported one idea from Vice President Dick Cheney was for the US Navy to build four or five boats that looked like Iranian Naval PT boats, man and arm them with US Navy Seals, then have the Navy Seals attack a US Navy ship off Iran’s coast. The incident would be filmed and used as propaganda to enflame US public opinion for war with Iran.[14]Hersh is the reporter who insiders trusted to report the My Lai Massacre and its cover-up in the Vietnam War, and the Abu Ghraib Torture Scandal in the current Iraq war. Scott Ritter, US former weapons inspector and officer for US Marine Intelligence calls any covert planning and actions by their correct legal name: Acts of War. Ritter states the obvious: the US would never allow Iran to take these actions without calling them Acts of War.[15]
     
    Recently and disturbingly, was the US Air Force admission that they “mistakenly” transported six live nuclear warheads attached to ready-to-launch cruise missiles to the US military base that is the jump-off for US supplies to Middle East Operations. This could be a veiled threat of nuclear war against Iran rather than explained by the long chain of continuous “mistakes” required for such an event to occur.    [16] Nuclear weapons are protected by detailed protocol and lethal force; they go nowhere by mistake and had a 50 year perfect record for their handling.
     
    President     Obama’s UN speech on Wednesday September 23 was full of lies of omission and commission. He claimed Iran was “in pursuit of nuclear weapons” without proof and all existing reports and IAEA inspections confirming Iran is only in pursuit of their legal right to nuclear energy. Mr. Obama continued: “But if the governments of Iran and North Korea choose to ignore international standards, if they put the pursuit of nuclear weapons ahead of regional stability and the security and opportunity of their own people, if they are oblivious to the dangers of escalating nuclear arms races in both East Asia and the Middle East,” he said, adding, “Then they must be held accountable.” President Obama then asked the world leaders to demonstrate to Iran and North Korea that international law is not an “empty promise.” “We must insist that the future not belong to fear,” he said.  
     
    President Obama is a lying sack of spin, along with the Republican leadership for their silence in the face of these transparent lies. The US is out of compliance of the international standards of NPT, not Iran. The US and Israel threaten regional stability, security, and opportunity for Iran. The US is unaccountable, holding NPT as an empty promise, and actively instilling fear for the future.
     
    Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon told Reuters: “I think the fact that such brutal thugs, such barbaric dictators like Ahmadinejad, speak in front of the world assembly is a real low point in the annals of the United Nations.”     Israel’s Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman claimed “without a doubt” the Islamic Republic is pursuing nuclear weapons, and, “Without wasting time, we must work towards the overthrow of the mad regime of Teheran.”  
     
    Secretary of State Clinton piled-on the propaganda, stating Iran must prove their program is peaceful, despite all evidence stating that it is and none suggesting otherwise. President Obama and Secretary of Defense, along with members of Congress, also threatened a military response to Iran. French President Sarkozy: “More uranium enrichment and declarations by the leaders of Iran to wipe a UN member state off the map,” he continued, referring to Israel. Sarkozy repeats the lie that Iran threatened Israel.
     
    Iran has responded by     demanding proof that they have been deceptive or out of compliance in any way. They also assert that the US, UK, and France are and have been out of compliance with NPT for over 40 years. They did not mention Iran’s replacing the dollar for the Euro as their oil reserve currency that might explain much about the US sharp response. 
     
    In conclusion of this analysis, res ipsa loquitur, the facts speak for themselves. The US is attempting to deceive their people through political and media manipulation to believe Orwellian claims exactly opposite from the truth. The UK, France and Israel are accomplices in this criminal deception.
     
    If you wish to continue this history of lies to inflict war upon the innocent, and damn your     allegiance to the US Constitution, rule of law, and American values, believe the transparently false rhetoric that bombards us. If you choose to build a brighter future of human cooperation, especially those of you with an oath to defend and protect the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC, then you must tell the simple truth concerning this understandable issue of NPT. Call out lies as lies. Refuse to accept illegal orders of aggression based on known lies; that is the duty of Patriots and the accepted legal conclusion from the Nuremberg Principles: Principle IV states, “The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.” Saying one was just following orders is no excuse under the law.
     
    My recommended policy response because of the magnitude of the criminal lies and liars is     Truth and Reconciliation.

end

September 30, 2009 Posted by | GeoPolitics, History | , , , , , | 5 Comments

Vitamin D: The Sunshine Vitamin and the Prevention of Chronic Disease!

end

September 30, 2009 Posted by | Medicine & Health | 3 Comments

FDIC Proposes Banks Prepay Deposit Fees Through 2012.

  • The FDIC is busted! It needs a bailout from banks! What is going on here? The recession is coming to an end because the depression in beginning! Bloomberg reports :
      
    The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. proposed asking banks to prepay three years of premiums to replenish reserves dented by a rash of bank failures that the agency said will cost $100 billion through 2013. The insurance fund will run a deficit as of tomorrow after 120 banks failed in the past two years, the agency said today. Half the costs from seized banks have been incurred already and prepaying the fees will raise $45 billion, the FDIC said. The agency rejected options for a second special fee or borrowing from the Treasury Department.
     
    “What we are proposing to do is to tap the ample liquidity of the banking industry to improve our own liquidity position without borrowing from the Treasury,” FDIC Chairman     Sheila Bair said at a Washington board meeting. The agency raised its five- year loss estimate by 43 percent. The agency is required by law to rebuild the fund when the reserve ratio, or the balance divided by insured deposits, falls below 1.15 percent. It was 0.22 percent on June 30. The fund, drained by 95 bank failures this year, had $10.4 billion at the end of the second quarter. The fund will erase its deficit by 2012, the staff said.
     
    The proposal approved by the board requires banks to pay premiums for the fourth quarter and next three years on Dec. 30. The board backed prepayments over alternatives such as borrowing taxpayer dollars from the Treasury, charging the banking industry a special fee in addition to levies they already pay and borrowing directly from the banks.
      ….
    Assessment Opposition
    “For banks that were already feeling the effects of a weak economy, special assessments could only make them weaker,” said Dugan, a member of the five-person FDIC board. Under the proposal, the FDIC wouldn’t impose another special assessment this year. The agency would raise assessments by 3 basis points in 2011. The FDIC will seek public comment until Oct. 28 and then make a decision on its approach.
     
    The FDIC raised its projected fund losses, from $70 billion in May, because the assets and number of failed and “problem” banks have increased, said     Arthur Murton, director of the FDIC’s division of insurance and research. Bank failures will peak this year and 2010, he said. The banking industry lobbied against a special fee that would be added to the regular annual premium, telling the FDIC and Congress such a levy would hurt their ability to raise capital. The industry welcomed the FDIC’s proposed approach.
     
    ‘Better Solution’
    “It’s certainly a better solution than taking a large chunk of money out of banks’ income and capital,”     James Chessen, chief economist at the American Bankers Association, said. The prepayment approach gives “the FDIC the cash that they need, it will be paid for by the industry and it will not have the severe impact that other options would have had on banking,” Chessen said.
     
    Banks paid a special assessment in the second quarter that raised $5.6 billion for the insurance fund, in addition to an estimated $12 billion in annual premiums. The agency also has authority to impose fees in the third and fourth quarters. Banks backed prepayment because the premiums are classified as an asset when the payment is made, becoming an expense during the quarter in which the obligation is due.
     
    The agency has authority to borrow against a Treasury line of credit that Congress in May increased to $100 billion. This option would have put the FDIC in the position of borrowing from taxpayers in the wake of public anger over the bank bailout.

end

September 30, 2009 Posted by | Economics | , , , | Comments Off

Liberals and Democrats Will Support the Coming Mass Murder Campaign Against Iran !

Under the U.S. client Shah Pahlavi, it was acceptable for Iran to develop nuclear energy.

Under the U.S. client Shah Pahlavi, it was acceptable for Iran to develop nuclear energy.

  • This is not the time to be quiet in the face of the massive propaganda war in the western MSM. Remember Iraq? Where were the WMD? There were non! Where were the links between Saddam Hussein and 9/11 attack? There were non! Over 1 million Iraqi civilians have died because the Neo Cons lust for Iraqi oil and world conquest. Over 250,000 Afghanistan civilians are dead. Why ? Because the corporate fascist American government wants to build their oil pipeline across their country. The CIA wants to control the poppy fields in Afghanistan right? The Taliban had been actively destroying the fields.
     
  • What are the calls for troop increase in Afghanistan and Pakistan about? They need the troops for their coming war with Iran. Both Afghanistan and Pakistan are on the eastern borders of Iran. Iraq is on the western border. The encirclement is almost complete. Time to trigger this war right?
     
    Daniel 7:23
    23 “Thus he said: 
          ‘ The fourth beast shall be
          A fourth kingdom on earth,
          Which shall be different from all other kingdoms,
          And shall devour the whole earth,
          Trample it and break it in pieces.
     
  • Infowars.com reports :
     
    It looks like an attack on Iran is a fait accompli. It’s just a matter of timing at this point. Reading the corporate media — and much of the so-called “progressive” media — one hears what amounts to a chant: Iran has nukes, Iran has nukes… or they will very soon.
      
    In fact, Iran does not have nuclear weapons. It does not have the capability to build one solitary nuclear bomb, crude or otherwise. Iran has not enriched uranium to the point required to make a bomb. It has enriched uranium for nuclear energy. Iran’s uranium enrichment is less than five percent and consistent with fuel for a civilian nuclear power plant. Iran has imposed restrictions on its enrichment program including ratifying the Additional Protocol to allow more stringent inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency, operating the uranium enrichment facility at Natanz as a multinational fuel center with the participation of foreign representatives, renouncing plutonium reprocessing and immediately fabricating all enriched uranium into reactor fuel rods. The IAEA has repeatedly said Iran is not enriching nuclear-weapons grade uranium.
     
    But this does not matter. The U.S. government and its European partners, Israel, and the corporate media have repeated the lie that Iran is building a nuclear bomb so often that millions of people believe it and think Iran is a threat. Even peacenik liberals who mistrusted Bush and the neocons now believe Iran is a threat. They just disagree on how this manufactured and phantom threat should be addressed.
      …..
    It looks like mass murder before Christmas.
    Keep in mind that when the “liberal” Clinton was in office, he had few problems with his “liberal” supporters when he attacked Serbia. Democrats stood behind Clinton’s mass murder campaign. “For many leading Democrats, including some in top positions in the Obama administration, it was a ‘good’ war, in contrast to the Bush administration’s ‘bad’ war on Iraq,” writes     Stephen Zunes. “Unless there’s a willingness to critically re-examine the war, the threat of another war in the name of liberal internationalism looms large.”
     
    Zunes points out that liberals supported the illegal and immoral bombing campaign because they “recognized the severity of the ongoing oppression of the Kosovar Albanians and the need to challenge Serbian ethno-fascism.”
      
    Serbian mistreatment of minorities was selectively focused on by the U.S. government for geopolitical reasons. “While showing themselves ready and willing to bomb Yugoslavia on behalf of an ostensibly oppressed minority in Kosovo, U.S. leaders have made no moves against the Czech Republic for its mistreatment of the Romany people (gypsies), or Britain for oppressing the Catholic minority in Northern Ireland, or the Hutu for the mass murder of a half million Tutsi in Rwanda,” writes historian     Michael Parenti. “Nor have U.S. leaders considered launching “humanitarian bombings” against the Turkish people for what their leaders have done to the Kurds, or the Indonesian people because their generals killed over 200,000 East Timorese and were continuing such slaughter through the summer of 1999, or the Guatemalans for the Guatemalan military’s systematic extermination of tens of thousands of Mayan villagers.” 
     
    The problem with the Serbs and Yugoslavia was they were a viable nation and an economic success. Between 1960 and 1980 Yugoslavia had one of the most vigorous growth rates: a decent standard of living, socialist medical care and education, a guaranteed right to a job, one-month vacation with pay, a literacy rate of over 90 percent, and a life expectancy of 72 years, as Parenti notes.
     
    “The dismemberment and mutilation of Yugoslavia was part of a concerted policy initiated by the United States and the other Western powers in 1989. Yugoslavia was the one country in Eastern Europe that would not voluntarily overthrow what remained of its socialist system and install a free-market economic order,” Parenti explains. In short, it was a threat to the New World Order and the so-called “free traders,” that is to say the rape and pillage gang on Wall Street. It had to go — and in sensational fashion so other uppity states would get the message. It was easy to sell the mass murder campaign to the liberals. Clinton sold it as humanitarian intervention. It was nothing of the sort
      
    Iraq was dismembered under a different and more cynical pretense — Saddam represented a threat to his neighbors (this was the pretense under Bush Senior) and then under Bush the Lesser he was a threat to the United States itself with weapons of mass destruction and support for al-Qaeda. Of course, as I said at the time, these were transparent and easily debunked lies. It didn’t matter. The American people — habitually ignorant of history, geography, and politics — bought into the lies and supported Bush’s mass murder campaign.
     
    Iraq was a lot like Yugoslavia. In the 1970s the country had well-developed health and education systems. People from around the Arab world went to Iraq to get a college education. Infant mortality and diseases were in decline. All of this changed when Iraq went to war with Iran in the 1980s. The war was encouraged and supported by the U.S. Reagan removed Iraq from the State Department list of known terrorist countries, sold chemical weapons to Saddam (including weapons grade anthrax and botulinum), and provided military logistics. At the same time, the U.S. agreed to facilitate the sale of arms to Iran through Israel. The eight year conflict resulted in nearly a million dead Iranians and Iraqis. Bush Senior’s invasion a few years later made a bad situation far worse.
     
    Between the two Bush gangsters and Bill Clinton, the U.S. has killed well over 2 million Iraqis. Obama will either sign off on an Israeli attack on Iran or he will direct the U.S. to bomb the country. Millions of liberals will support this because they are brainwashed by the government and the corporate media into the completely fallacious belief that Iran has nukes or will have them soon. Millions more will not directly support the coming mass murder campaign but will not raises their voices in opposition to Obama.
     
    Opposition is irrelevant. Recall Bush arrogantly dismissing the antiwar movement as a “focus group.” Obama will ignore the small number of people who will go into the street on the day after Israel or the U.S. bombs Iran. Obama is a puppet to the international bankers and the one-worlders and he will do as instructed.
     
    Iran has to be reduced to a smoldering wasteland the same way Iraq was because it is outside the one-world loop. It does not take orders from Wall Street and the international bankers. Iran has its own ideas on how the country should be ruled and this is unacceptable. It has nothing to do with nukes, the alleged antisemitism of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, or even the dictatorship of the clerics. The coming attack on Iran is about breaking the back of the Iranian people and killing off their leaders. It’s about making Iran part of the global slave plantation.

end

September 30, 2009 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , , | 6 Comments

Turkish President Erdogan: Focus on Israeli Nukes, not Iran Nuclear Energy Program !

  • Erdogan the Turkish president speaks the truth. He is not under the control of the Zionist Illuminati cabal. Most Zionists are just brain washed Jews and Christians. The Zionist Illuminati cabal I am talking about are the hidden Satanists who manipulate the world to their cause: New World Order, One World Government, Global Fascist Police State.
     
  • Why are these Satanists, Zionists? This has to do with what Satan desire in his heart :
     
    Isaiah 14:12-14
    12 “ How you are fallen from heaven,
          O Lucifer,[b] son of the morning!
          How you are cut down to the ground,
          You who weakened the nations!
           13 For you have said in your heart:      ‘ I will ascend into heaven,
          I will exalt my throne above the stars of God;
          I will also sit on the mount of the congregation
          On the farthest sides of the north;
           14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds,
          I will be like the Most High.’
           15 Yet you shall be brought down to Sheol,
          To the lowest depths of the Pit. 
      

  • He wants to ‘be like the Most High‘. God’s throne on earth is in Jerusalem. This is the city where God the Father will be worshipped and God the Son rule. Thus, the Satanic plan has been to create a counterfeit state of Israel (and I know the blasphemy of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.), rebuild the temple, place his ‘son’ the Anti-Christ on the throne in Jerusalem and get the whole world to worship his ‘son’ and himself Satan: like God the Father.
     
  • Press TV reports :
      
    The Turkish president has condemned Western countries’ focus on Iran’s nuclear program, stressing that the world should deal with Israel’s nuclear weapons instead. Turkey’s “Radikal” newspaper on Sunday reported that Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s strong comments against Israel’s nuclear program was similar to his “one minute” stance in Davos in January     when he walked out of a televised debate with his Israeli counterpart Shimon Peres.
     
    Erdogan told reporters in New York that Iran’s nuclear program is not aimed at “military ends”.  The Turkish president noted that Israel has “nuclear weapons” and has used “phosphorous bombs” against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. “Why these are not on the agenda? It is always Iran…” Erdogan told reporters in New York.
     
    “If only Iran is put on the world agenda, then we may neglect other issues such as the Gaza [conflict] that should be addressed,” he said.
    Erdogan, upon his arrival to Istanbul from New York, said that during his meetings in the UN General Assembly and the G20 leaders’ summit in Pittsburg, no military option against Iran has been on agenda.
     
    Iran’s northwestern neighbor has also urged caution over imposing any new sanctions on Tehran, saying they will not be useful. The Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan is due to visit Tehran next month to discuss Iran’s nuclear program with President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
     
    Erdogan ruled out any attempts to impose sanctions on Tehran’s gas industry, saying sanctions would be especially problematic for its neighbor Turkey. The Turkish president has plans to visit Iran next month to help resolve the dispute over Tehran’s nuclear program.
     
    “I will make a trip to Iran towards the end of October… We will discuss regional problems, including this (nuclear) one,” Turkey’s Anatolia news agency quoted Erdogan as saying.
     
    Israel, which is the only possessor of nuclear weapons in the Middle East and has imposed several wars on the region, accuses Iran of trying to develop a military nuclear program and has repeatedly voiced its determination to halt the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program through military options.
     
    Unlike Israel, Iran is a signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and has been pushing for a the removal of all weapons of mass destruction across the globe. Tehran says its nuclear program is being pursued within the framework of the IAEA and international regulations. The UN nuclear watchdog in its previous reports had confirmed that Iran only enriches uranium-235 to a level of “less than 5 percent.”
     
    Uranium, which fuels a nuclear power plant, can be used for military purposes only if enriched to high levels of above 90 percent.     

end

September 30, 2009 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , , , | 9 Comments

Iran’s Nuclear Facilities: The Facts! Who is Really Destabilizing the Middle East?

  • The war mongering is escalating. War with Iran seems inevitable. The Neo-Cons madmen who are running America and Israel is hell bent on starting this war. Quite frankly all the facts are against them. But they control the MSM and thus the hollywood presentation last week during the G20 meeting. What total bull crap lies and propaganda! Can you trust Obama, Sarkozy, Brown and Netanyahu? They lie and lie constantly and unabashedly.
     
  • Listen to Dr. Ron Paul he tells the truth! The Iranian has not broken any international law but have abide by all they agreed to. Please circulate this and break the MSM propaganda. The world do not need this war! This war will easily escalate into World War 3. The Satanic cabal that rules the western world want to trigger this war. They are losing their grip on their financial fiat currency hegemony. China is a huge threat to their economic and financial system. China can just tell all of them to goto hell and go in alone economically and financially. This will end their central bankster fiat currency control.
     
  • The modern state of Israel is not the same as the Israel in the bible. Here are the facts about modern Israel:
      
    1980 Jewish Almanac
    “Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew.”
    (1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3).
      
    The Jewish Encyclopedia:
    “Khazars, a non-Semitic, Asiatic, Mongolian tribal nation who emigrated into Eastern Europe about the first century, who were converted as an entire nation to Judaism in the seventh century by the expanding Russian nation which absorbed the entire Khazar population, and who account for the presence in Eastern Europe of the great numbers of Yiddish-speaking Jews in Russia, Poland, Lithuania, Galatia, Besserabia and Rumania.”
      
    The American Peoples Encyclopedia
    …     for 1954 at 15-292 records the following in reference to the Khazars: “In the year 740 A.D. the Khazars were officially converted to Judaism. A century later they were crushed by the incoming Slavic-speaking people and were scattered over central Europe where they were known as Jews.
     
    American Jew Jack Bernstein
    The powerful Zionist propaganda machine has led the American people to believe that a Jew is a Jew — one race of people and that they are “God’s Chosen People”. I will deal with the “God’s Chosen People” LIE later. First, it is important for you to understand that Jews are NOT one race of people.
     
    There are two distinct groups of Jews in the world and they come from two different areas of the world — the Sephardic Jews from the Middle East and North Africa and the Ashkenazi Jews come from Eastern Europe. The Sephardic is the oldest group and it is they, if any, who are the Jews described in the Bible because they lived in the area described in the Bible. They are blood relatives to the Arabs — the only difference between them is the religion.
     
    The Ashkenazi Jews, who now compromise 90% of the Jews in the world, had a rather strange beginning. According to historians, many of them Jewish, the Ashkenazi Jews came into existence about 1200 years ago.
      ……
    The Khazars chose Judaism, but it wasn’t for religious reasons. If the Khazars had chosen Islam, they would have angered the strong Christian world. If they had chosen Christianity, they would have angered the strong Islamic world. So, they played it safe — they chose Judaism. It wasn’t for religious reasons the Khazars chose Judaism; it was for political reasons.
     
    Sometime during the 13th century, the Khazars were driven from their land and they migrated westward with most of them settling in Poland and Russia. These Khazars are now known as Ashkenazi Jews. Because these Khazar Ashkenazi Jews merely chose Judaism, they are not really Jews — at least not blood Jews.
     
  • Having said this, there are no grounds for hating anyone, Jews, Muslims or Christians…etc.. based on their race, color or religion. God does not teach us to hate. What I am trying to point out is: Christians should not blindly follow the propaganda dished out by the MSM. The idea that modern Israel is God’s chosen people and can do no wrong is utterly a lie.  In the old testament, God unreservedly condemned the Jews when they sinned. And God threw them out of the holy land when they refuse to repent of their sins.
     
  • Who is really destabilizing the middle east? Truth hurts but it is still the truth!
     
    Estimates of the Israeli Nuclear Arsenal
    1997  >400 deliverable thermonuclear and nuclear weapons 

end

September 30, 2009 Posted by | GeoPolitics | , , | 6 Comments

   

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 534 other followers