Socio-Economics History Blog

Socio-Economics & History Commentary

Dr. Russell Blaylock: Vaccine May Be More Dangerous Than Swine Flu

  • What the good doctor say is true. Don’t be taken for a ride. So what if you catch this mild 3-4 days flu. It is even weaker than seasonal flu. We need to counter all the MSM propaganda BS that we should look to vaccines to save us! Dr Blaylock writes :
      
    An outbreak of swine flu occurred in Mexico this spring that eventually affected 4,910 Mexican citizens and resulted in 85 deaths. By the time it spread to the United States, the virus caused only mild cases of flu-like illness.
     
    Thanks to air travel and the failure of public health officials to control travel from Mexico, the virus spread worldwide. Despite predictions of massive numbers of deaths and the arrival of doomsday, the virus has remained a relatively mild disease, something we know happens each year with flu epidemics.
     
    Worldwide, there have only been 311 deaths out of 70,893 cases of swine flu. In the United States, 27,717 cases have resulted in 127 deaths. Every death is a tragedy, but such a low death rate should not be the basis of a draconian government policy.
     
    It is helpful to recall that the Centers for Disease Control with the collusion of the media, constantly tell us that 36,000 people die from the flu each year, a figure that has been shown to be a lie. In this case, we are talking about 300 plus deaths for the entire world.
     
    This virus continues to be an enigma for virologists. In the April 30, 2009 issue of Nature, a virologist was quoted as saying,“Where the hell it got all these genes from we don’t know.” Extensive analysis of the virus found that it contained the original 1918 H1N1 flu virus, the avian flu virus (bird flu), and two new H3N2 virus genes from Eurasia. Debate continues over the possibility that swine flu is a genetically engineered virus.
     
    Naturally, vaccine manufacturers have been in a competitive battle to produce the first vaccine. The main contenders have been Baxter Pharmaceuticals and Novartis Pharmaceuticals, the latter of which recently acquired the scandal-ridden Chiron vaccine company. Both of these companies have had agreements with the World Health Organization to produce a pandemic vaccine.
     
    The Baxter vaccine, called Celvapan, has had fast track approval. It uses a new vero cell technology, which utilizes cultured cells from the African green monkey. This same animal tissue transmits a number of vaccine-contaminating viruses, including the HIV virus.
     
    The Baxter company has been associated with two deadly scandals. The first event occurred in 2006 when hemophiliac components were contaminated with HIV virus and injected in tens of thousands of people, including thousands of children. Baxter continued to release the HIV contaminated vaccine even after the contamination was known.
     
    The second event occurred recently when it was discovered that Baxter had released a seasonal flu vaccine containing the bird flu virus, which would have produced a real world pandemic, to 18 countries. Fortunately, astute lab workers in the Czech Republic discovered the deadly combination and blew the whistle before a worldwide disaster was unleashed.
     
    Despite these two deadly events, WHO maintains an agreement with Baxter Pharmaceuticals to produce the world’s pandemic vaccine. Novartis, the second contender, also has an agreement with WHO for a pandemic vaccine. Novartis appears to have won the contract, since their vaccine is near completion. What is terrifying is that these pandemic vaccines contain ingredients, called immune adjuvants that a number of studies have shown cause devastating autoimmune disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis and lupus.
     
    Animal studies using this adjuvant have found them to be deadly. A study using 14 guinea pigs found that when they were injected with the special adjuvant, only one animal survived. A repeat of the study found the same deadly outcome.
     
    So, what is this deadly ingredient? It is called squalene, a type of oil. The Chiron company, maker of the deadly anthrax vaccine, makes an adjuvant called MF-59 which contains two main ingredients of concern—squalene and gp120. A number of studies have shown that squalene can trigger all of the above-mentioned autoimmune diseases when injected.
     
    The MF-59 adjuvant has been used in several vaccines. These vaccines, including tetanus and diphtheria, are the same vaccines frequently associated with adverse reactions.
     
    I reviewed a number of studies on this adjuvant and found something quite interesting. Several studies done on human test subjects found MF-59 to be a very safe immune adjuvant. But when I checked to see who did these studies, I found—to no surprise—that they were done by the Novartis Pharmaceutical Company and Chiron Pharmaceutical Company, which have merged. They were all published in “prestigious” medical journals. Also, to no surprise, a great number of studies done by independent laboratories and research institutions all found a strong link between MF-59 and autoimmune diseases.
     
    Squalene in vaccines has been strongly linked to the Gulf War Syndrome. On August 1991, Anthony Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs admitted that soldiers vaccinated with the anthrax vaccine from 1990 to 1991 had an increased risk of 200 percent in developing the deadly disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), also called Lou Gehrig’s disease. The soldiers also suffered from a number of debilitating and life-shortening diseases, such as polyarteritis nodosa, multiple sclerosis (MS), lupus, transverse myelitis (a neurological disorder caused by inflammation of the spinal cord), endocarditis (inflammation of the heart’s inner lining), optic neuritis with blindness and glomerulonephritis (a type of kidney disease).
     
    Because squalene, the main ingredient in MF-59, can induce hyperimmune responses and induce autoimmunity, a real danger exists for prolonged activation of the brain’s immune cells, the microglia. This type of prolonged activation has been strongly associated with such diseases as multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, ALS and possibly vaccine-related encephalitis. It has been shown that activation of the systemic immune system, as occurs with vaccination, rapidly activates the brain’s microglia at the same time, and this brain inflammation can persist for long periods.
     
    So, how would the gp120 get into the brain? Studies of other immune adjuvants using careful tracer techniques have shown that they routinely enter the brain following vaccination. What most people do not know, even the doctors who recommend the vaccines, is that most such studies by pharmaceutical companies observe the patients for only one to two weeks following vaccination—these types of reactions may take months or even years to manifest.
     
    It is obvious that the vaccine manufacturers stand to make billions of dollars in profits from this WHO/government-promoted pandemic. Novartis, the maker of the new pandemic vaccine, recently announced that they would not give free vaccines to impoverished nations—everybody pays.
     
    One must keep in mind that once the vaccine is injected, there is little you can do to protect yourself—at least by conventional medicine. It will mean a lifetime of crippling illness and early death.
     
    There are much safer ways to protect oneself from this flu virus, such as higher doses of vitamin D3, selective immune enhancement using supplements, and a good diet.
     
  • See also :
     
    Dr. Russell Blaylock on 1976 Swine Flu and Current Outbreak
    1976 Swine Flu Vaccination Propaganda and The Side Effects
    Ron Paul: Be Careful of the Rush into the Swine Flu Vaccine. 1976 Swine Flu Vaccine Killed People!
    Previous Swine Flu Outbreak Originated At Fort Dix!
    Do Not Take A Swine Flu Vaccine!
    Live Avian Flu Virus Placed in Baxter Vaccine Materials Sent to 18 Countries
    Flashback: Homeless People Die After Bird Flu Vaccine Trial in Poland
    Bayer Exposed (HIV Contaminated Vaccine)! 
    Flu Pandemic Propaganda and Profit
    Children Who Get Flu Vaccine Have Three Times Risk Of Hospitalization For Flu, Study Suggests
    1300 Girls Harmed by HPV Vaccines in UK; Bizarre Side Effects Like Paralysis and Epilepsy
    US Marines Used As Lab Rats for Vaccines!
    Doctor Questions Value of Vaccines
    MMR Vaccine Injury

end

July 15, 2009 - Posted by | Medicine & Health | ,

135 Comments

  1. I cannot believe this is true!

    Comment by gratis downloaden | July 19, 2009

    • Of course you don’t believe it’s tzrue.
      Because it isn’t.
      MF59 does not contain GP120 !!!!
      I wonder if there is any legal liability for persons like Mr. Russell B, who diseminate such false information.

      Comment by Bernard | September 1, 2009

      • Bernard
        I have read two books by Dr. Blaylock. He is an excellent researcher as well as retired neurosurgeon. I trust his work but anyone can make a mistake or depend on some research that has been cooked but you have not provided any evidence to refute his statement in the comments that I can find. You have the same responsibility to tell the truthyou indicate he does!

        Comment by Bill Harrison | September 8, 2009

      • And where is your proof that it doesn’t contain GP-120? Are you a practicing Doctor? What research did you do to come up with that conclusion?

        Comment by Hairless Monkey | October 14, 2009

      • Dear Bernard:

        I wonder if there is there any legal liability for criminal companies like Baxter, GSK, Novartis and their ilk, for disseminating fraudulent scientific claims and poisoning our blood with contaminated and untested vaccine/chemical cocktails?

        Oh I forgot, they were all given legal immunity from public redress for harm caused by their poisons. I wonder, do you spend the same amount of time pointing out all the blatant scientific errors, omissions and deceptions perpetrated by doctors who have prostituted themselves to Big Pharma?

        Bernard, sadly you miss the point entirely, while you sit there quibbling over GP120 and MF59. Could you please inform us as to your credentials on the subject of adjuvants, viral antigens, heavy metals, immunological responsivity, etc.?

        Please tell me you at least have a Bachelor’s degree in Science, before you continue chastising a veteran doctor who has real credentials and medical research experience.

        Cheers.

        Comment by Omega | October 17, 2009

      • Dear Bill, Hairless and Omega,
        I did not miss the point.
        I am aware of all the issues about the vaccine. However, there is no need to exagerate by introducing false claims.
        The content of MF59C.1 is easibly accessible by a simple internet search.
        OK, everyone can make a mistake.
        And as long as it is a mistake, I don’t think anyone should be called upon for responsibility. So if it is a mistake, I take back my question on legal liability.
        But there is still a matter of followers like you guys, who like to stick to such a claim even if the author of the text acknowledges he made a mistake.
        And yes, I am a doctor, very much involved in vaccine testing, vaccine licencing and usage, so it was clear to me immediately that there is no gp120 in the adjuvant or in the flu vaccine.

        Comment by Bernard | October 19, 2009

      • What are we supposed to think or do for that matter—I hear things on TV as to hoe bad it is, plus 2 men in excellent heath who are fighting for their lives in hospital. One is on a ventilator, the other his kidneys has closed down. This was on TV just this past week.

        Comment by Doreen Page | November 13, 2009

    • “I cannot believe this is true!”

      This attitude is exactly why Americans are in danger –the refusal to believe that people with power can possibly want to harm others. Your denial system is dangerous to me and to all free people.

      Comment by aletheamarinanova | September 8, 2009

      • What aletheamarinanova says is true, how many people that have or had power over others, had wanted more. Let’s say a lot. There are a FEW people with power that know how to take care of their people. If you get what I mean. Here’s a question: If you are 13-16 can your parents force you to take the vaccine? I’d rather get the swine flu and live, because I know that’s possible, than get the vaccine and die or get seriously ill. I would like to live a happy life! Not one with diseases.

        Comment by Samantha Sue008 | October 22, 2009

    • I personally do not plan to take the vaccine myself as nobody can promise me that it’s safe. Think about it, vaccination is a medical intervention performed on a healthy person that has the ability to result in injury or death of that person. I do not want any medicine that could kill me, especially when I’m not sick. How does that make any sense? The flu at least I know is relatively safe and won’t permanently damage me.

      The dangers of vaccinations to us or our children’s long term health prospects and longevity far outweigh any potential benefits touted by the pharmaceutical industry for vaccines. Vaccines often don’t work plus they have very dangerous side-effects. I would at least think twice before getting one.

      Many Physicians opposing swine flu vaccination. Flu shots = money, not safety. Don’t believe the hype! -Dr. Jake http://wp.me/pC1DX-2S

      Comment by connectivetissue | October 1, 2009

    • Clearly this guy is out to lunch. His so-called facts are anecdotal, and absolute crap like this harms all of us. The most dangerous part of any vaccination is the drive to the clinic. He has some alternative agenda, I’m not sure what. Good science is good science; unfortunately people believe this kind of utter BS, and lives are lost as a result. Follow the sound advice of your family physician.

      If I wanted vaccine advice I wouldn’t be asking a neurosurgeon, that’s for sure!!!!!

      Keep your harmful opinions to yourself Blaylock, and publish the real facts, not your extreme, outdated, and harmful ideas.

      Comment by Dontbelievethehype | October 25, 2009

      • You may not believe this, that vaccines are dangerous, and that is your choice.
        There are many who followed the Pied Piper( big pharmaceutical) off into the ocean. If you choose to kill yourself that is your choice. The price paid for ignorance.

        Dr. Russell Blaylock is a neurosurgeon and researcher who has done the research as many other have. It would be most advised for all to do the research for themselves and err on the side of caution and avoid the injection of foreign materials into their body that can not be easily removed.
        The damage once done is done and not reversible.

        Those of us who have done the research know what we are talking about, that simple. Those who watch TV and listen to the advertisements usually have little knowledge or understanding beyond the mind controlled propaganda they adsorb as they mindlessly sit there. Research does require some work.

        It is your choice to inject your self. It is not really your place to lie and perpetuate the lie.

        Comment by Wisdom of experience | November 3, 2009

  2. [...] to take H1N1 vaccine from GSK Our Lives at Risk: Drug Company Greed and Dangerous Vaccines Dr. Russell Blaylock: Vaccine May Be More Dangerous Than Swine Flu David Icke: Don’t Take The A/H1N1 Vaccine! Belgium Health Minister passes law allowing use of [...]

    Pingback by Maj. Gen. Albert Stubblebine III & Dr. Rima E. Laibow: Dangerous Vaccines, Corrupt Big Pharma, Eugenics Depopulation and the Coming Forced/Mandatory Vaccination! « Socio-Economics History Blog | July 20, 2009

  3. Permit me to add Dr. Veljko Veljkovic’s assessment of gp120, which is also added to most experimental HIV vaccines and other vaccines injected into our kids:
    http://www.i-sis.org.uk/isisnews/i-sisnews11-19.php
    The culprit viral gene
    The intended vaccines all contain gp120, a glycoprotein (protein decorated with side-chains of carbohydrates) belonging to the envelope of the human AIDS virus, HIV-1. The candidates include recombinant HIV proteins and peptides (subunit vaccines), HIV-1 or SIV (the monkey AIDS virus), killed or ‘attenuated’, ie, rendered harmless by successive passage in cultured cells, and a wide range of recombinant viral, bacterial and plasmid vectors expressing HIV proteins. (Plasmids are pieces of parasitic genetic material existing outside the cell’s genome, and are replicated by the cell independently of the cell’s genome.)

    HIV researchers Dr. Veljko Veljkovic and his colleagues in Belgrade Yugoslavia, have shown that the gp120, is similar to the part of human immunoglobulin (antibody) proteins (Ig) involved in binding foreign antigens, a crucial step in the immune response. Thus, any AIDS vaccine containing the gp120 glycoprotein or the gene coding for it could strongly interfere with the immune system and make the host more vulnerable to the virus. And in the longer term, it could accelerate disease progression in HIV patients that do not yet have symptoms.

    But the gp120 gene has other properties that pose an even greater threat to the vaccinated population. It contains ‘recombination hotspots’ similar to those in bacteria and viruses such as Haemophilus influenzae, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, hepatitis B virus and herpes simplex virus, that often co-infect with the HIV, and also similar to recombination elements found in immunoglobulin genes and oncogenes (genes associated with cancer) in the human host. Recombination hotspots are breakpoints at which genetic exchange or recombination occurs much more frequently than usual. Recombination of HIV with bacteria and viruses would generate new pathogens. Within the human host, recombination with human genes would promote chromosomal rearrangements and formation of abnormal immuno-globulins, thus undermining immune responses. HIV-1 sequences integrated into the genome can act as retrotransposons (jumping genes) that can mutate genes by jumping into them, and some of the mutations may trigger cancer [1].

    Dr. Veljkovic’s team, in collaboration with researchers in UK, Italy and US, have already found evidence of recombination between gp120 and a gene from Haemophilus influenzae [2]. Recombination between an HIV gene and Mycoplasm fermentans has been implicated in ‘Gulf war syndrome’ [3] affecting a high proportion of soldiers from the United States and the United Kingdom who served in the Gulf war. A new subtype of HIV-1 may also have resulted from recombination between HIV-1 and SIV [4].

    The proponents of the AIDS vaccination trials argue that the desperate situation precipitated by the AIDS epidemic justifies acceptance of the ‘small risks’ involved. But Veljkovic and his colleagues have written a monograph documenting the lack of efficacy of the vaccines and the enormous risks involved [5].

    Not effective and dangerous
    In 1994, the AIDS Research Advisory Committee of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) recommended that phase III clinical trials of gp120 vaccines should not be conducted “at this time and in this country”. The reasons, according to Dr. A. Fauci, director of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), were that the vaccines were ineffective; and there was a remote chance that the vaccines would compromise the immune system and make the recipient more vulnerable to infection [6].

    The possibility that a vaccinated individual runs a greater risk of developing an established infection, or of progressing to disease more rapidly once infected, was confirmed subsequently [7]. The recombinant gp120 subunit vaccine tested in HIV-negative individuals was ineffective in protecting them against infection. Those who became infected during or after vaccination actually had in their blood sera significant levels of antibodies against the vaccine before they became infected, but those antibodies failed to protect them from infection. On the contrary, the vaccine appeared to have acted as a decoy to fool the immune system into mounting an attack on it, while allowing the HIV itself to slip through the host defence to get established. This subunit vaccine is due to go on Phase III clinical trial in Thailand.

    Live recombinant viral and bacterial vaccines
    The safety concerns for the individual are bad enough. But it is the effect on vulnerable populations that really worries Veljkovic and his colleagues, especially from the live recombinant viral and bacterial vector vaccines (see box).

    Many viral and bacterial pathogens are being used as vectors, and a number are currently considered promising AIDS vaccines. But they are also promising candidates for generating new infectious agents.

    Also refer to http://www.i-sis.org.uk/AVWTU.php

    The gp120 protein is strongly immunogenic, which is why it is widely used in vaccines, in the hope that the body will produce antibodies against the protein and hence protect against the virus. But there have been many worrying signs that this may have just the opposite effect.

    For although the body mounts a strong immune reaction against the protein, and produces antibodies against it, those antibodies fail to protect against the virus. One main reason is that the virus is very mutable, and can readily mutate to escape immune detection. In addition, the immune reaction mounted against the original gp120 undermines the effectiveness of the immune system by over-stimulating it, so that it is less effective to cope with new infections.

    A recombinant gp120 vaccine tested in HIV-negative individuals in phaseI/II trails, was not effective in protecting against the disease. Not only that, participants in the trials had significant levels of circulating antibodies against the vaccine before they became infected, and came down with AIDS disease.

    The vaccine could also be dangerous. A vaccine based on the gp120 from the strain SF2, actually suppressed the production of antibodies that could neutralise the later infecting virus, while boosting the production of useless antibodies that were specific for the vaccine strain, SF2. In other words, gp120 acts as a molecular decoy to disarm the body’s antiviral response, leaving it more vulnerable, and increasing the likelihood of rapid disease progression in those vaccinated that later became infected. This phenomenon is called “deceptive imprinting” of the immune system.

    And he continues:
    First of all, the part of the gp120 molecule that plays the dominant role in provoking an immune response is the V3 loop. The V3 loop and flanking regions are similar in base sequence and structure to the antigen-binding region of the human immunoglobulin (Ig) (antibody protein). And it has been proposed since the early 1990s that this immunoglobulin-like domain in gp120 may interfere with the immune regulatory network.
    Another piece of evidence implicating genetic recombination is that the V3 loop and its flanking regions are located between recombination signals similar to those found in human immunoglobulins, and also similar to the Chi recombination hotpots found in many viruses and bacteria. Consequently, the immunologically dominant region of gp120 may be involved in recombining with human immunoglobulin genes resulting in autoimmune responses, and may also recombine with co-infecting viruses and bacteria to generate new pathogens. Evidence of such recombination has subsequently been found in the sera of AIDS patients.”

    Let me add to that another danger, namely the viral promoters such as the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) used in genetic engineering and subsequently contained in GM feed and food.
    ” It is pertinent to point out that transgenic DNA in GM food and feed also carry recombination hotspots, such as the ones associated with the CaMV 35S promoter and the left and right borders of the Agrobacterium T-DNA used as vector to introduce transgenic DNA into the plant genome. These recombination hotspots enhance horizontal gene transfer and recombination. Furthermore, as Veljkovic said, the recombination hotspots in transgenic DNA may interact with the recombination signals flanking the V3 loop of the gp120 gene in AIDS vaccines to generate yet more exotic viruses.”

    Ingrid Blank/South Africa

    Comment by Ingrid Blank | July 22, 2009

    • All that you wrote about gp120 here is completely irrelevant to the topic, because, influenza vaccines don’t contain gp120.
      OK?
      I am surprised how readily people put their trust into such claims whicdh have absolutely no credibility.

      Comment by Bernard | September 1, 2009

      • Well Bernard, you may indeed be correct; “MF59 does not contain GP120!!!!”
        Can you supply us with a detailed list of the exact ingredients in the “MF59″ adjuvant?
        Dr. Blaylock may have been eluding to an integral connection between gp120 and MF59…as they are typically found together, in a combined adjuvant, in an effort to boost immunogenicity and, vaccine efficacy.
        It (gp120) is most definitely used to increase the efficacy of influenza vaccines…since 1984 and onward. This particular invention does typically consist of the gp120/MF59 combination.
        Perhaps you, or others, may have heard of ISCOMs. “Immunostimulating Complex” or ISCOM; it is one adjuvant with multiple adjuvant properties. This invention is being used in several vaccine applications, e.g., HIV and Influenza (Iscom Matrix and influenza-ISCOMs).

        Comment by Christopher-Peter: Maingot | September 5, 2009

      • Dear Christopher-Peter,
        The contents of MF59C.1 is easily accessible on the internet.
        Just type MF59 into Google.
        There is no integral connection between gp120 and MF59.
        There was just one unsuccessful HIV vaccine candidate containing gp120 adjuvanted with MF59. No other vaccine contains gp120, neither has any contained it since 1984 onward. Yes,
        I heard of ISCOM. It does not contain gp120.

        Comment by Bernard | October 19, 2009

  4. [...] to take H1N1 vaccine from GSK Our Lives at Risk: Drug Company Greed and Dangerous Vaccines Dr. Russell Blaylock: Vaccine May Be More Dangerous Than Swine Flu David Icke: Don’t Take The A/H1N1 Vaccine! Belgium Health Minister passes law allowing use of [...]

    Pingback by Do Drug Companies Secretly Favor a World Flu Pandemic? « Socio-Economics History Blog | July 29, 2009

  5. I have been diagnosed with swine flu and prescribede medication. Howerver I have had a history of endocarditis is it wise to take the medication x

    Comment by melanie cowan | July 30, 2009

  6. Thank you, thank you, thank you…..This is disgusting. They are just trying to kill us at every level !!!!

    Comment by Maria | August 26, 2009

  7. This vaccine will have far worse side effects than the actual flu. It might not be immediately evident, but it will show itself in the near future. I implore all individuals to reject this vaccine.

    Comment by heidilore | August 26, 2009

  8. [...] Source Article [...]

    Pingback by Vaccine May Be More Dangerous Than Swine Flu | MATADOR NINETY-FOUR | August 26, 2009

  9. [...] en diverse andere pijnklachten. ‘Squalene veroorzaakt auto-immuun ziektes’ In een ander artikel schrijft Dr. Russell Blaylock dat het H1N1 (Mexicaanse) griepvaccin om diverse redenen [...]

    Pingback by Eindtijd » Blog Archive » Griepvaccin bevat 1 miljoen keer meer squalene dan veroorzaker Golfoorlog Syndroom | August 26, 2009

  10. This is ridiculous?
    Where did Mr Blaylock find the info that MF59 contains gp120???
    This is simply not true!!!!!!

    Comment by bernard | September 1, 2009

  11. OIL and Water Won’t Mix – ADJUVANT

    The Greatest Story Never Told – Chapter Three

    For the past 17 years, the U.S. Army has been working on a new anthrax vaccine that contains no anthrax, and is made with an ingredient that it does not want to name. That ingredient is called squalene. Squalene is an oil. Without it, the new vaccine will not work any better that the old one. In fact, for all intents and purposes, without squalene the new vaccine is the old one. What makes squalene so important is it’s proven ability to stimulate a strong response from the immune system.

    Immunologist have a special name for substances used to boost feeble vaccines. They are called ADJUVANTS. Adjuvants are arguably the most extensively researched pharmaceutical product in the last quarter century that you NEVER HEARD OF.
    I have used the word adjuvant three times in this paragraph so far and that is probably three times more than you have ever seen it in print. This is partly because the most effective adjuvants, those formulated with oils, ARE TOO DANGEROUS FOR HUMAN USE. That is squalene’s other proven ability, causing incurable disease, which is why it is such a touchy subject with the Department of Defense.

    Today, only one adjuvant—an aluminum salt called alum—is licensed for human use. All the oil adjuvants are so noxious that their use are restricted to experiments with animals, and even then, governments have written strict regulations to govern how they are used.
    The classic oil adjuvant, called Freund’s Complete Adjuvant can cause permanent organ damage and incurable disease. As early as the 1930s, these oil additives were notorious for inducing illness. By the 1950s, scientist knew these illnesses were specifically AUTOIMMUNE. Today that is their chief use in research—inducing disease instead of preventing it. Scientist studying autoimmune disease cannot wait around for it’s spontaneous appearance in a lab animal.

    Autoimmune diseases are chronic and progressively debilitating ailments; some, like Multiple Sclerosis and Lupus, can be fatal. They occur when the immune system looses its ability to distinguish what is “self” from what is foreign. Under normal circumstances, your immune system ignores the constituents of your own body; immunologist call this “tolerance.” But, IF TOLERANCE IS BROKEN, the immune system turns relentlessly self-destructive, attacking the body it is suppose to defend.

    Here is what they were not telling anyone. By 1964, the year when everyone in the military was supposed to get immunized with an OIL-BOOSTED INFLUENZA VACCINE, the Army already knew the risks this vaccine presented for a very specific type of illness. AFEB’s Colonel Abram S. Benenson had drawn up a list of diseases that investigators should watch out for in veterans injected with the oily flu vaccine at Fort Dix. Benenson’s list read like the contents of a chapter on autoimmune disease in an immunology text book. It included Multiple Sclerosis, Myelitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), Uveitis, Neuro-Dermatitis Circumscripta and Disseminata, Amyloidosis, Lupus- Erythematousus, Dematomyositis, Scleroderma, Chronic Pericarditis, Raynaud’s disease, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Rheumatoid Myositis and acute Glomerulonephritis—all of them AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES.

    Epidemiologists, mainly working for the National Research Council And the American Cancer Society, reported a “significant excess of deaths” in soldiers (TROOPS) given the OIL-BOOSTED VACCINE, which the investigators related to “ill-defined vascular lesions of the central nervous system.” They attributed this fact to the greater number of autopsies performed on the soldiers given the oil-boosted vaccine.

    ADJUVANTS can break TOLERANCE…read more from: Vaccine A: the covert government experiment that’s killing our soldiers and Why GI’s Are Only the First Victims – By Gary Matsumoto
    A free preview of the complete, Chapter Three, is available on line…you must read this…NOW!
    books.google.com/books?id=Irw82Iv5nyoC&a…e&q=&f=false

    CTV.ca News – September 1, 2009
    H1N1 plan fails at-risk groups, journal warns.

    The federal government is ill prepared to protect vulnerable populations in Canada, warns the Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ).
    The journal’s editor, Dr. Paul Hebert says; the PUBLIC HEALTH AGENCY of CANADA (PHAC) plans to immunize the entire Canadian population.
    But Herbert, and vaccine expert Dr. Noni MacDonald, write that the federal government needs to fast-track the vaccine for pregnant women, children and people with chronic diseases.

    PHAC has opted to order a version of the vaccine containing ADJUVANT, a chemical additive that ramps up the response the immune system generates to the vaccine.
    “An adjuvant allows you to take a full dose of the vaccine and divide it in four… and vaccinate four people,” Hebert explained.
    But that type of vaccine also takes longer to approve than vaccines without adjuvant because it needs to be reviewed more thoroughly.
    http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTV…/20090831?hub=Health

    Flu season: How many shots?
    August 31, 2009 – THE CANADIAN PRESS
    Doctors don’t know yet if it will take one dose or two of vaccine to protect against the new swine flu.

    Swine flu jab link to killer nerve disease: Leaked letter reveals concern of neurologists over 25 deaths in America.
    Jo Macfarlane – Daily Mail – August 15, 2009
    The letter from the Health Protection Agency, the official body that oversees public health, has been leaked to The Mail on Sunday, leading to demands to know why the information has not been given to the public before the vaccination of millions of people, including children, begins.
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1206807…-deaths-America.html

    Financial Post – Canwest News Service – August 07, 2009
    The World Health Organization emphasized the safety of vaccines and said; “manufacturers are “on track” to have one ready for the swine flu pandemic by September.” Health officials will be on alert for signs of Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS), a rare condition, in which the body’s immune system attacks the nervous system and, which can be life threatening.

    $400M contract goes to GlaxoSmithKline factory in Quebec City – August 6, 2009 – CBC News
    Canada to order 50.4 million H1N1 (SWINE FLU) vaccine doses – One dose should be enough, because: GlaxoSmithKline is using an additive known as ADJUVANT. Adjuvants are used to boost immune response from vaccines.

    Glaxo: 9 more countries order 96 million doses of swine flu vaccine – August 4, 2009 – THE CANADIAN PRESS
    Glaxo said the first supplies of the vaccine would be available beginning in September, but depends on how well the virus used to make the vaccine is growing. The World Health Organization (WHO) said the viruses being used for the vaccines were not producing enough of a key ingredient.

    WHO recommends; countries should use SWINE FLU vaccines with ADJUVANTS – to stretch the global supply of the vaccines – August 4, 2009 – THE CANADIAN PRESS
    Flu vaccines in Europe often contain adjuvants.
    The European Medicines Agency has previously said swine flu vaccines based on a pre-approved bird flu vaccine could be licensed within five days, even without extensive testing in humans.
    In the United States, there are no licensed flu vaccines with adjuvants – The U.S. has ordered $979 million worth of bulk vaccine and Novartis’ adjuvant (MF59®).

    MF59; is a sub-micron oil-in-water emulsion of a squalene, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate (TweenTM 80) and sorbitan trioleate. Squalene is a natural organic compound originally obtained from shark liver oil and a biochemical precursor to steroids. The “MF59” adjuvant was developed by Chiron Corp., a company acquired by Novartis. MF59 is approved in Europe and is found in several vaccines; such as an influenza vaccine manufactured by Novartis. It has also been licensed to other companies and is being actively tested in vaccine trials.
    http://www.whale.to/vaccines/mf59_h.html

    Boosting compounds called adjuvants complicate licensing of pandemic vaccines – July 28, 2009 – THE CANADIAN PRESS
    Boosting compounds known as ADJUVANTS may added to stretch out limited supplies.
    Neither country, CANADA and the UNITED SATES, has licensed flu vaccines with adjuvants in them before, making the addition of the oil-and-water emulsions a potential hurdle to fast-track pandemic vaccines.

    Canadian, U.S., & European PANDEMIC vaccines FAST-TRACKING SYSTEM, years in the planning.
    July 28, 2009 – THE CANADIAN PRESS

    Health Canada (HC), the Food and Drug Administration (FDS) and the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) all intend to treat the pandemic vaccine as a supplement to existing flu vaccines licenses.

    The goal is to try to SPEED approval of the VACCINE so that it can be used before the pandemic is over.

    If pandemic vaccines were treated like a brand new vaccine; for instance,
    HPV or rotaviruses for instance, trials involving tens of thousands of people would be needed.

    An outbreak of swine influenza in the U.S. in early 1976 led to fears a pandemic was emerging. More than 40 million people in the U.S. were vaccinated. The pandemic never materialized, but roughly 500 people developed Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS), and about 25 deaths were attributed to the vaccination program.

    Science can’t always explain why GBS occurs, and it still can’t answer why the 1976 vaccination program led to a spike in cases. Experts hope the modernization of flu vaccine manufacturing since 1976, will eliminate the risk of a repeat performance.

    But they also know that even if this vaccine were to elevate the risk of developing GBS, clinical trials are unlikely to detect it. Millions of doses of the 1976 vaccine were administered before U.S. authorities could see that there was a problem and that the problem was likely related to the vaccine.

    So how will regulators proceed now?

    To understand CANADA’S approach, it’s helpful to first look at what the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) has done: It offered all flu vaccine manufacturers the chance to go through a special advance licensing process, producing a “core dossier” of safety and immunogenicity data on their manufacturing processes and their pandemic vaccines.

    Three companies – Baxter International, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and Novartis – went through the process, using H5N1 vaccines as their surrogate pandemic vaccines.

    These “mock-up dossiers,” as they are called, serve as the regulatory proof of safety and immunogenicity of any pandemic vaccine these manufacturers make. Manufacturers then apply for a “pandemic variation” to switch the subtype covered by the vaccine from H5 to the pandemic virus, in this case an H1N1.
    “The whole concept of the mock-up vaccine relies on the fact that you can extrapolate to some extent the clinical efficacy data, explains Monika Benstetter, a press officer for the EMEA.

    They (Europe) have licensed ‘the mock’ if you like . . . and then all that was needed was a strain change. Canada went through a similar process with this country’s pandemic vaccine contractor (GSK) except, CANADA wants GSK to do a small trial – involving 100 to 200 people, probably – to generate some safety and immunogenicity data for the H1N1 vaccine before the pandemic vaccine can get approval, explained Dr. Elwyn Griffiths of HEALTH CANADA.

    *HPV – Human Papilloma Virus
    *ROTAVIRUS
    *Baxter International

    *GARDASIL: A controversial vaccine for the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV), concerning safety and long-term effects, was fast-tracked by FDA & HEALTH CANADA. This vaccine is still in the testing stages…final report due September 30, 2009…it is already being administered to thousands of young girls and women. http://www.judicialwatch.org/documents/2008/JWR…pvVaccineRecords.pdf

    See OFFICIALS of GOVERNMENT; voting fraudulently -
    LAWMAKERS…breaking the law – 4:00 video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfhO38CPlAI
    So much is going on during a vote on the “HPV” – VACCINE MANDATE; you really have to pay attention (1 minute and 11 seconds into the video). Watch the fraudulent voting; it takes place in the Texas Legislature. It continues without objection, or reprimand…what do you think would happen to you, or me, if we were caught doing this?

    *FDA Issues Notice On RotaTeq Rotavirus Vaccine – February 15, 2007
    The FDA issued a public health notice about the rotavirus vaccine ROTATEQ.
    It has received 28 reports on infants getting intussusception after being vaccinated with RotaTeq (Live, Oral, Pentavalent vaccine against Rotavirus).
    Intussusception is a serious life threatening condition, where the bowel collapses. http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/63074.php

    *Baxter International… Alarming News about Baxter International.
    On February 27, 2009, various news agencies including Helen Branswell in the Canadian Press, reported: Baxter International that “released contaminated flu virus material from a plant in Austria confirmed (today) that the experimental product contained live H5N1 avian flu viruses.” The WHO said the incident occurred at the company’s research facility in Orth-Donau, Austria, but claimed “that public health and occupational risk is minimal” thus far. What’s not known, however, “are the circumstances” behind the incident that, according to some, raise suspicions while others call it a willful criminal act…more on that.
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14272

    Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 briefing note 6

    The public needs to be reassured that regulatory procedures in place for the licensing of pandemic vaccines, including procedures for expediting regulatory approval, are rigorous and do not compromise safety or quality controls.

    Ways were sought to shorten the time between the emergence of a pandemic virus and the availability of safe and effective vaccines. Different regulatory pathways were assessed, and precautions needed to ensure quality, safety, and effectiveness were set out in detail.

    in Europe, some manufacturers have conducted advance studies using a so-called “mock-up” vaccine. Mock-up vaccines contain an active ingredient for an influenza virus that has not circulated recently in human populations and thus mimics the novelty of a pandemic virus. Such advance studies can greatly expedite regulatory approval.
    http://www.who.int/csr/disease/swineflu/notes/h1n1_safety_vaccines_20090805/en/index.html

    Information compiled and provided by Christopher-Peter: Maingot; without prejudice, malice aforethought, ill will, vexation, or frivolity.

    Comment by Christopher-Peter: Maingot | September 3, 2009

  12. [...] Sources: Bild.com August 21, 2009 Reuters August 22, 2009 Socio-Economics History Blog July 15, 2009 [...]

    Pingback by Another Shocking Warning About Swine Flu Vaccine « In These New Times | September 8, 2009

  13. [...]   Socio-Economics History Blog July 15, 2009 [...]

    Pingback by إحذر مصل إنفلونزا الخنازير « غذاؤك هو حياتك | September 8, 2009

  14. [...] Socio-Economics History Blog July 15, 2009 [...]

    Pingback by Another Shocking Warning About Swine Flu Vaccine Svínaflensan og bólusetning « Ármann og fjölskylda | September 8, 2009

  15. [...] Sources:   Bild.com August 21, 2009   Reuters August 22, 2009   Socio-Economics History Blog July 15, 2009 [...]

    Pingback by Another Shocking Warning About Swine Flu Vaccine « Dr. Herman's Blog | September 8, 2009

  16. Have you all forgotten that the “Fast-Track” H1N1 Vaccine is NOT the same one as the Mock-up vaccine thats why it’s NOY approved by the FDA. Also take note that this fast-track vaccine is made with our STOCK PILED vaccine and thoughs were STOPPED because people were dropping dead like flys after injected. All in All do a SEARCH for : BAXTER LAWSUIT 2009. The number of suits filed against Baxter in August for shipping vaccines contaminated with Aids and the deadly bird flu will make you vomit. Also, if you still don’t beleave the news check the W.H.O. site arcives and Patents filed by Baxter then you will know the truth.

    Comment by Leslie P | September 8, 2009

  17. So, is GP120 in this vaccine or not?

    Comment by Mary | September 8, 2009

    • Your guess may be as good as anybody’s right now Leslie…can you or anyone else here access accurate and definitive information, that can be used to answer your question; what’s in the VACCINE?

      This may not be an easily acceptable answer for some people, even if there was one, especially for those still suffering from VACCINE damage after receiving SHOTS during Desert Shield & Desert Storm and beyond…read Gary Matsumoto’s book: Vaccine A. The covert government experiment that’s killing our soldiers and Why GI’s Are Only the First Victims
      http://books.google.com/books?id=Irw82Iv5nyoC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_navlinks_s#v=onepage&q=&f=false

      One thing for sure; there will be, ADJUVANT in your SWINE FLU VACCINES TOO.

      A $400M contract, went to GlaxoSmithKline factory in Quebec City CANADA, to brew theirs with ADJUVANT and, more than likely it will be the infamous SQUALENE OIL & WATER MF59.

      Also, bear this in mind too; there has, and continues to be, VACCINES, which have been administered to millions of unsuspecting peoples around this world, especially the “SEASONAL FLU SHOT VACCINES” which have, as part of the ingredients…beside THIMEROSAL (C9H9HgNaO2S – approximately 49% mercury by weight) ADJUVANT, i.e., MF59.

      It (gp120) is most definitely used to increase the efficacy of influenza vaccines…since 1984 and onward. This particular invention does typically consist of the gp120/MF59 combination.
      Perhaps you, or others, may have heard of ISCOMs. “Immunostimulating Complex” or ISCOM; it is one adjuvant with multiple adjuvant properties. This invention is being used in several vaccine applications, e.g., HIV and Influenza (Iscom Matrix and influenza-ISCOMs).

      Comment by Christopher-Peter: Maingot | September 13, 2009

      • My apologies for referring to you as Leslie, Mary. I wish I could literally take it back, but the intent is real.

        Comment by Christopher-Peter: Maingot | September 13, 2009

  18. [...] Documentation about Swine Flu Vaccine Safety A recent article by Dr. Blaylock also highlights the many reasons why the vaccine may be far more dangerous than the virus. If you [...]

    Pingback by Dr. Mercola’s Update on Swine Flu | September 8, 2009

  19. [...] Dr. Russell Blaylock says that the vaccine may be more dangerous than the virus itself. One reason is because the vaccine uses cultured cells from the African green monkey which has been linked to transmitting many vaccine contaminating viruses, the most notable being HIV. He also found that the vaccine contains squalene which has been linked to autoimmune diseases. [...]

    Pingback by The swine flu vaccine, a scam? « Steve DaCorta | September 8, 2009

  20. In 1997, I received injections of the Hepatitis vaccination, provided in THREE injections, over several months. Shortly there-after, I could no longer run and developed “hyperspasticity” and “hyper-reflexia”. Following an MRI, I was diagnosed with MS in 01/98.

    I saw Dr. Blaylock, and initiated a green, nearly raw diet and his detox from aspartame program. I remain new lesion free, have NEVER exacerbated and fully re-myelinated the cerebellar lesion. Immunoscience tests indicate a sensitivity to wheat, whey, gluten and dairy, not MS. Thus the nearly raw, green diet!

    Dr. Blaylock KNOWS!!!! LISTEN!!!! Donlad Rumsfield gets PAID each time we are vaccinated!

    Comment by Em | September 8, 2009

  21. A woman doctor from Finland speaks out about the global depopulation intentions behind the Swine Flu injections and the propaganda war being waged to impose this murderous criminality on the people of the world. Very informative.

    Please watch: 6 min video


    >=187

    Comment by Em | September 8, 2009

  22. [...]   Bild.com August 21, 2009   Reuters August 22, 2009   Socio-Economics History Blog July 15, 2009 [...]

    Pingback by Another Shocking Warning About Swine Flu Vaccine | Rights To Freedom | September 8, 2009

  23. Frances Beck (now at Wayne State Univ School of Medicine, Detroit) and I published a paper in the mainline international journal called Immunology in1974, vol 27 pp 311-330. (This journal is published in the UK.) In it we described how squalene induced demyelinating disease in rats as a model for human multiple sclerosis. It is really scary that after 35 years, we are still being steam-rollered into accepting the wisdom of multinational drug companies that their vaccines containing squalene are OK for use in the present swine flu ‘beat-up’. I strongly urge concerned readers to get a copy of Gary Matsumoto’s book called Vaccine-A: The covert government experiment that’s killing our soldiers. 2004 Basic Books NY and still available from Amazon.com. Here he describes how many US military personnel were immunised compulsorily before serving in the operation Desert Storm with squalene-containing adjuvants in the vaccine for anthrax. The consequences are carefully listed but include degenerative nerve and joint diseases – both of which have been reproduced in laboratory rats by injecting squalene. The most depressing part about all this is that for 30 years, before Matsumoto, and the last five years since his book became available, all this information has been conveniently ignored by the medical and military decision-makers. So power to the people is still a great slogan when we consider the public health issues involved here.

    Comment by Michael Whitehouse | September 9, 2009

    • I’d love an opportunity to live in Queensland (almost made it earlier this year).

      I found Gary’s book to be extremely informative; especially regarding more of the other, obscure and underlying issues relative to Gulf War Syndrome (GWS). His book was an easy and, if I may so (not to be taken out of context) enjoyable read….Footprints in the Snow was the perfect start to this book, which I also recommend everyone to read.

      Dr. Whitehouse: In reference to your published paper – Immunology in 1974. If by chance you should have the on-line link to access the archive sections of the international journal, where I may find your paper, I would appreciate it if you can pass it on.

      Congratulations to you and Dr. Beck for the brilliant work in this extremely important field of study…my sister was recently (this year) diagnosed as having MS, and she had been having Flu Shots administered here in Canada for the past few years prior.

      Comment by Christopher-Peter: Maingot | September 17, 2009

  24. [...] on the H1N1 flu virus Dr. Russell Blaylock: Vaccine May Be More Dangerous Than Swine Flu September 9th, 2009 | Category: [...]

    Pingback by James Japan – Adventures hitch-hiking in Japan. «Adventures in Japan | September 9, 2009

  25. WHAT TO DO ????????????????????????????????

    Comment by Peg | September 9, 2009

  26. [...] Socio-Economics History Blog July 15, 2009 [...]

    Pingback by Swine Flu or Swine Hype? « Notochemo's Blog | September 10, 2009

  27. [...] [...]

    Pingback by Swine Flu Vaccine = FATAL | September 11, 2009

  28. [...] Sources: Bild.com August 21, 2009 Reuters August 22, 2009 Socio-Economics History Blog July 15, 2009 [...]

    Pingback by Swine flu vaccine — more warnings & rejection by doctors & public « www.johndenugent.com | September 12, 2009

  29. [...] Propaganda and The Side Effects Dr. Russell Blaylock on 1976 Swine Flu and Current Outbreak Dr. Russell Blaylock: Vaccine May Be More Dangerous Than Swine Flu Ron Paul: Be Careful of the Rush into the Swine Flu Vaccine. 1976 Swine Flu Vaccine Killed People! [...]

    Pingback by 2000 SchoolGirls Suffer Suspected Ill-Effects from Cervical Cancer Vaccine ! « Socio-Economics History Blog | September 15, 2009

  30. [...] Center – Search.mercola.com This is an article from Dr Blaylock, he's a leading researcher….. Dr. Russell Blaylock: Vaccine May Be More Dangerous Than Swine Flu Socio-Economics History Blog National Vaccine Information Center ? Vaccine Watch Dog Independent news on natural health, [...]

    Pingback by H1N1 (swine flu) - YorkieTalk.com Forums - Yorkshire Terrier Community | September 16, 2009

  31. I sincerely hope that the “Pro-vaccination” groups take the FIRST shot and set a good example for the rest of us.Call us two or three months, maybe a year, and tell your story.

    Comment by Will H. | September 17, 2009

  32. ADJUVANT – VACCINE booster or “nano-bomb”???

    They were intent on creating something Mother Nature had not. “Designer disease,” they would later call it.

    Dr. Sergei Popov was one of the Soviet Union’s best germ warriors, and running highly classified field research projects at The State Research Center of Applied Microbiology at Obolensk, and another laboratory in Siberia, specializing in viruses called VECTOR. While at Obolensk, Popov supervised a program codenamed “FACTOR”—as in “pathogenic factors” or “virulence factors”—where he helped engineer designer germs resistant to antibiotics. That is when he got interested in U.S. research with myelin basic protein.

    American molecular biologist had mapped out the entire amino acid sequence for myelin—one of the chief components of the insulation surrounding nerve endings. Now they were hard at work trying to identify the epitopes on viruses that would cross-react with a special site on the myelin molecule to which an antibody might react and, cause experimental allergic encephalomyelitis—the animal version of multiple sclerosis. As the California-based scientists Robert Fujinami and Michael Oldstone explained in a landmark paper in Science: “during the cross-reacting immune response, virus may be cleared, but the components of the immune attack continues to assault self elements. The autoimmune response leads to tissue injury that, in turn, releases more self antigen, and the cycle continues.” Fujinami and Oldstone called the initial infection a “hit and run event.” By this they meant the virus attacked, and though it didn’t stick around, it left behind lasting damage. That is because the immune system continues to attack the molecule in the body that resembles the one in the germ, long after the immune system has gotten rid of the germ. Once this self-destructive process begins, it never stops; our bodies continue making the molecule the immune system is now trained to attack. If this new target for the immune system happened to be myelin, for example, the body would continue making this protein in order to replenish and repair the sheath around it’s nerve endings. But in the act of doing so, the body immunizes itself against itself, administering over and over again what amounts to a booster dose of something that the immune system now wants to get rid of. This vital constituent of your own body is now the enemy, and the immune system is now programmed to obliterate it in an endless loop of self-destruction [italics mine]. Dr. Sergei Popov saw real potential here.

    He would not bother looking for a naturally occurring molecule that could trigger this process. He would make one. Popov spliced a fragment of myelin basic protein into legionella—the bacterium that causes Legionnaire’s Disease—creating a “chimera,” named for the mythical creature with a lion’s head, goat’s body and serpent’s tail. Inside Popov’s new constructed chimera was what amounted to a living “nano-bomb”—molecular contraband that could theoretically cause MS. When Popov infected guinea pigs with his chimera, the immune system cleared the legionella, and, just as he predicted, the myelin molecule smuggled into the guinea pigs inside of his microbial Trojan horse germ initiated a second wave of disease. This stealth germ caused experimental allergic encephalomyelitis, the animal version of MS. Popov felt as proud as a new parent. He could not wait to show “the client.”

    “The client” is what VECTOR scientists called the Soviet Army officers who commissioned their biological warfare research projects. “Their initial response was rather discouraging,” says Popov, “because they did not see the fast onset of symptoms.” What the generals were accustomed to seeing was a germ with an immediate and catastrophic effect, but when they came back a few weeks later and saw the guinea pigs crippled MS, they recognized Popov’s creation for what it was—a biological time bomb. Soviet scientists then constructed another one of these time bombs with a virus. They chose vaccinia, the non-lethal cousin of smallpox. Popov, who is now living in America, believes the “final construct” for this viral time bomb was not vaccinia, but smallpox itself. In any case, it worked. “The client” had seen enough. The generals were sold on the idea. “The Russian Ministry of Defense wanted us to construct these designer germs, using myelin basic protein from monkeys and humans,” says Popov. “That would create a human version of the disease.”

    Molecular mimicry, seen for its diabolical potential as a weapon by the Soviets as far back as the 1980s, also applies to SQUALENE [caps mine]. But the real problem with using squalene, of course, is not that it mimics a molecule found in the body; it is the same molecule. So what American scientists conceived as a vaccine booster was another “nano-bomb,” instigating chronic, unpredictable and debilitating disease [italics mine]. When the National Institutes of Health (NIH), argued that squalene would be safe because it is native to the body, just the opposite was true. Squalene’s natural presence in the body made it one of the most dangerous molecules injected into human beings [italics mine]. When UCLA Medical School’s Michael Whitehouse and Frances Beck injected squalene combined with other materials into rats and guinea pigs back in the 1970s, few oils were more effective at causing the animal versions of ARTHRITIS, and MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS [caps mine]. By the late 1990s, Sweden’s Karolinska Institute proved that injecting squalene all by itself could cause arthritis. The Polish Academy of Sciences proved that squalene alone could severe neurological damage. Now Tulane University Medical School and its ardent intellectual adversary—the Army’s Col. Carl Alving—have both shown that the immune system makes antibodies to squalene, but only after it is injected [Italics minee].

    For Squalene’s proponents in the U.S. Army and the NIH, this has been a relentless march towards an unpalatable truth. By adding squalene to their new anthrax vaccine, they did not make a better vaccine; they made a biological weapon [italics mine]. The anti-squalene antibodies in sick U.S. and British military personnel are evidence that military experiments may have caused more casualties with its new anthrax vaccine than have been caused by anthrax weapons since they were first used by the Japanese Army in the 1940s.

    The above is an excerpt from Gary Matsumoto’s book (with modifications):

    VACCINE.A
    The Covert Government Experiment
    That’s Killing Our Soldiers
    and Why GI’s Are Only the First Victims
    http://books.google.com/books?id=Irw82Iv5nyoC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_navlinks_s#v=onepage&q=&f=false

    CANADA’S VACCINE MAKER says single dose of ADJUVANTED VACCINE protective.
    September 14, 2009 – THE CANADIAN PRESS
    [caps & bolding mine]

    TORONTO – A shot of swine flu vaccine that is about a third of the size of a standard dose is protective when BOOSTED WITH an additive called an ADJUVANT, CANADA’S PANDEMIC VACCINE MANUFACTURER (GlaxoSmithKline) said Monday.

    A single shot containing 5.25 micrograms of VACCINE and the company’s AS03 ADJUVANT had a SPIKE in ANTIBODY LEVELS thought to signal protection
    [caps & bolding mine].

    MP has H1N1 concerns.
    CBC News – September 14, 2009

    An NDP MP from Winnipeg: Judy Wasylycia-Leis wants to know what measures Elections Canada has in place to safeguard voters from the spread of swine flu, considering an election poses significant health risks with large public events and many people coming into contact during canvassing…hmmm
    (hmmm-mine).

    $400M contract goes to GlaxoSmithKline factory in Quebec City.
    August 6, 2009 – CBC News.

    Canada to order 50.4 million H1N1 (SWINE FLU) vaccine doses – One dose should be enough, because: GlaxoSmithKline is using an additive (AS03 – SQUALENE based) known as ADJUVANT. Adjuvants are used to boost immune response from vaccines [italics, caps and info on AS03 mine].

    THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO) recommends countries should use SWINE FLU vaccines with ADJUVANTS [caps mine] – to stretch the global supply of the vaccines.
    August 4, 2009 – THE CANADIAN PRESS

    Flu vaccines in Europe often contain adjuvants [italics and underline mine].

    The European Medicines Agency has previously said swine flu vaccines based on a pre-approved bird flu vaccine could be licensed within five days, even without extensive testing in humans.

    In the United States, there are no licensed flu vaccines with adjuvants – The U.S. has ordered $979 million worth of bulk vaccine and Novartis’ adjuvant (MF59®) [italics and underline mine].

    Boosting compounds called adjuvants complicate licensing of pandemic vaccines.
    July 28, 2009 – THE CANADIAN PRESS

    Neither country, CANADA and the UNITED SATES, has licensed flu vaccines with adjuvants in them before, making the addition of the oil-and-water emulsions a potential hurdle to fast-track pandemic vaccines [italics & bolding mine].

    MF59; is a sub-micron oil-in-water emulsion of a squalene, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate (TweenTM 80) and sorbitan trioleate. SQUALENE is a natural organic compound originally obtained from shark liver oil and a biochemical precursor to steroids. The “MF59” adjuvant was developed by Chiron Corp., a company acquired by Novartis. MF59 is approved in Europe and is found in several vaccines; such as an influenza vaccine manufactured by Novartis. It has also been licensed to other companies and is being actively tested in vaccine trials [bolding & caps mine].
    http://www.whale.to/vaccines/mf59_h.html

    Information compiled and provided by Christopher-Peter: Maingot; without prejudice, malice aforethought, ill will, vexation, or frivolity.

    Comment by Christopher-Peter: Maingot | September 17, 2009

  33. [...] recent article by Dr. Blaylock also highlights the many reasons why the vaccine may be far more dangerous than the [...]

    Pingback by H1N1 Hype? « Wellness4us's Blog | September 23, 2009

  34. The terrain or internal environment is all important in the disease process, whereas the microbe/virus (pathogen) is of secondary concern. Ask yourself: Why are some people more susceptible to “catching” the flu than others? Maintaining a robust immune system – by ensuring the body’s terrain is sound – is the key to good health. The host is everything!

    Comment by Gabriela | September 27, 2009

  35. [...] [...]

    Pingback by Swine Flu Vaccine - Mandatory Vaccinations - Page 3 | October 1, 2009

  36. I personally do not plan to take the vaccine myself as nobody can promise me that it’s safe. Think about it, vaccination is a medical intervention performed on a healthy person that has the ability to result in injury or death of that person. I do not want any medicine that could kill me, especially when I’m not sick. How does that make any sense? The flu at least I know is relatively safe and won’t permanently damage me.

    The dangers of vaccinations to us or our childrens long term health prospects and longevity far outweigh any potential benefits touted by the pharmaceutical industry for vaccines. Vaccines often don’t work plus they have very dangerous side-effects. I would at least think twice before getting one.

    Many Physicians opposing swine flu vaccination. Flu shots = money, not safety. Don’t believe the hype! -Dr. Jake http://wp.me/pC1DX-2S

    Comment by connectivetissue | October 1, 2009

    • Fully agree with you.. Greed is the worst pandemic!!!! No to vaccines!!!!

      Comment by abby kerk | January 22, 2011

  37. I have an idea. Why don’t those who want the vaccine just take it and see what happens? And those who don’t want it, don’t take it. Personally, if someone wants to take the flu vaccine, I say go for it. Just let me have the freedom to decide for myself what “I” want. It reminds me of those who commit murder/suicide. If they want to die, fine, but what gives them the right to take someone ELSE’S life?

    Comment by Jayne | October 11, 2009

  38. The rare Guillian-Barre syndrome appears to be a reversible and self limiting disease process. The paralysis that occurred in my experience was always reversible and never a cause of death. The progressive paralysis took 4 to 6 times longer to clear than the time from initial symptom appearance to to maximum symptoms. My experience only dealt with severe cases that required prologed respiratory assistance in a Pulmonary Intensive Care unit. There were no deaths in this small group of patients treated at the University of Minnesota Hospitals and St. Joseph Hospsital in Orange, CA.

    Comment by Dr. Arthur J. Oswald | October 12, 2009

  39. The concerns of the adjuvant are not relavent. From the CDC website. http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/vaccination/vaccine_safety_qa.htm

    Will the 2009 H1N1 vaccines that are currently recommended contain adjuvants?
    No. According to current federal plans, only unadjuvanted vaccines will be used in the United States during the 2009 flu season. This includes all of
    the 2009 H1N1 and seasonal influenza vaccines that will be available for children and adults in both the injectable and nasal spray formulations.
    None of these influenza vaccines will contain adjuvants.

    Comment by Steve | October 13, 2009

  40. Of all the vaccines, A(H1N1) vaccines, FAST TRACKED – APPROVED, for use in the U.S., and or North America, three of them contain “SQUALENE” (oil&water) based ADJUVANTS, they are: GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) “Prepandrix.” An Egg based production, split cell virus, containing the GSK (AS03) adjuvant. GSK boasts that more than 40,000 adults/children have received AS03 adjuvanted vaccines during development of seasonal & pandemic vaccines. Next in the line up, is the Sanofi-Aventis vaccine – “Humenza.” Formulated to contain 3.8 mcg hemagglutinin (HA), of influenza A/California/07/2009 (H1N1), v–like virus, and includes AF03-ADJUVANT. Sanofi Pasteur’s proprietary adjuvant is aimed at stimulating the immune system to increase its response. And, last but not least, is the infamous MF59 ADJUVANT, which many Gulf War Veterans can quite possibly relate to. The Novartis vaccine Celtura®, which was tested with 100 healthy volunteers, aged between 18 and 50 contains the MF59® adjuvant.

    So, Steve, what do you suppose the U.S. GOVERNMENT (HHS) is gonna do with the 415 million worth of SQUALENE (Oil/Water) ADJUVANT, which they purchased with FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES….make salad dressings?

    Information provided by Christopher-Peter: Maingot; without prejudice, malice aforethought, ill will, vexation, or frivolity.

    Comment by Christopher-Peter | October 13, 2009

  41. [...] [...]

    Pingback by H1N1 Vaccine - Page 3 | October 16, 2009

  42. [...] Propaganda and The Side Effects Dr. Russell Blaylock on 1976 Swine Flu and Current Outbreak Dr. Russell Blaylock: Vaccine May Be More Dangerous Than Swine Flu Ron Paul: Be Careful of the Rush into the Swine Flu Vaccine. 1976 Swine Flu Vaccine [...]

    Pingback by Top Insurer Tells 1,000 GPs Not To Give Swine Flu Vaccine! « Socio-Economics History Blog | October 16, 2009

  43. Will the 2009 H1N1 vaccines that are currently recommended contain adjuvants?
    No. According to current federal plans, only unadjuvanted vaccines will be used in the United States during the 2009 flu season. This includes all of the 2009 H1N1 and seasonal influenza vaccines that will be available for children and adults in both the injectable and nasal spray formulations. None of these influenza vaccines will contain adjuvants.

    2009 H1N1 vaccines with adjuvants are being studied to determine if they are safe and effective. Experts will review these data when they are available. There is no plan at this time to recommend a 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine with an adjuvant.

    http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/vaccination/vaccine_safety_qa.htm

    Comment by Edgar Bennett | October 16, 2009

    • Thimerosal in Vaccines is Safe? Who are we kidding? http://wp.me/pC1DX-4j

      There will be MOST DEFINITELY be thimerosal in many if not most H1N1 vaccines. Directly from the CDC: “The 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccines that FDA is licensing (approving) will be manufactured in several formulations. Some will come in multi-dose vials and will contain thimerosal as a preservative. Multi-dose vials of seasonal influenza vaccine also contain thimerosal to prevent potential contamination after the vial is opened. Some 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccines will be available in single-dose units, which will not require the use of thimerosal as a preservative. In addition, the live-attenuated version of the vaccine, which is administered intranasally (through the nose), is produced in single-units and will not contain thimerosal.” http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/vaccination/vaccine_safety_qa.htm

      Comment by connectivetissue | October 16, 2009

    • HHS Purchases Additional H1N1 Vaccine Ingredients.
      FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – July 13, 2009
      Kathleen Sebelius – Secretary of the U.S. department of HEALTH & HUMAN services (HHS) announced; the department will commit $884 million to purchase additional supplies of two key ingredients for H1N1 vaccines. The funds will be used to place additional orders for bulk H1N1 antigen and adjuvant. The vaccine ingredients will become part of the pandemic stockpile, for use in the vaccination campaign.
      http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2009pres/07/20090713b.html

      415 million worth of SQUALENE (Oil/Water) ADJUVANT, purchased with FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES, would be quite a bit of studying. Perhaps it was meant as future STIMULUS for these poor VACCINE MANUFACTURERS. Does it (adjuvant) have an expiry, or best before date???

      Comment by Christopher-Peter | October 16, 2009

  44. [...] As Dr. Russell Baylock has warned, the adjuvant squalene is linked to the Gulf War Syndrome. Soldiers who took the anthrax vaccine from 1990 to 1991 had an increased risk of 200 percent in developing the deadly disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), also called Lou Gehrig’s disease. The soldiers also suffered from a number of debilitating and life-shortening diseases, such as polyarteritis nodosa, multiple sclerosis (MS), lupus, transverse myelitis (a neurological disorder caused by inflammation of the spinal cord), endocarditis (inflammation of the heart’s inner lining), optic neuritis with blindness and glomerulonephritis (a type of kidney disease), according to Baylock. [...]

    Pingback by The elite has its own vaccine! unlike the sheeple !!! | NO LIES RADIO | October 17, 2009

  45. [...] READ ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE [...]

    Pingback by Vaccine May Be More Dangerous Than Swine Flu | NO LIES RADIO | October 17, 2009

  46. s there a new pandemic in town?
    By Dr. B. M. Hegde, India [August 20, 2009]

    I wonder as to how much longer will medicine’s flagship educational events (like warning of epidemics) fly the colours of the drug industry?

    “The very concept of objective truth is fading out of the world. Lies will pass into history. During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.”
    “If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.”
    “There are some ideas so wrong that only a very intelligent person could believe in them.” — George Orwell.

    What does it mean when the media says that there are deaths here and there due to Swine ‘Flu in a particular place?

    They rely on a simple bedside test that collects secretion samples from the throat, mouth and nose of the suspected patients and send it to designated laboratories for identifying the virus in question using a new rapid (rRT-PCR) test which, notably, is designed by the same pharmaceutical company that also has the world wide rights for selling Tamiflu, the drug that the common man thinks is the panacea for swine ‘flu! This (rRT-PCR) test has not been scientifically validated before being let lose on the gullible public by the US government with the plea that the urgency demands, “that the usual testing procedures be done away with.” In other words, we are having a test whose value is under doubt. The researchers in the field have admitted, “that this test is only presumptive and not definitive!” Its specificity and sensitivity could be as low as 50%. False positives and false negative tests are not unusual at all.
    http://mangalorean.com/browsearticles.php?arttype=Health&articleid=1529

    Applied Biosystems Receives FDA 510k Clearance for Real-time PCR Instrument for Use with New Flu Test from U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
    http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-187191884.html

    The multifaceted arrangement between Applied Biosystems and Roche
    http://www.in-pharmatechnologist.com/Industry-Drivers/Roche-opens-world-s-largest-PCR-facility

    GenoLogics
    http://www.genologics.com/partners/translational-research-partners

    Trinity East student tests positive for H1N1
    October 17th 2009
    http://www.trinidadexpress.com/index.pl/article_news?id=161545361

    Questions remain over A(H1N1) death of Da Costa
    A close friend has seen the death certificate…signed by pathologist Dr. Hughvon des Vignes.
    http://guardian.co.tt/news/general/2009/10/17/questions-remain-over-death-da-costa

    Government virus expert paid £116k by swine flu vaccine manufacturers
    27th July 2009
    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1202389/Government-virus-expert-paid-116k-swine-flu-vaccine-manufacturers.html#ixzz0UD0w27O1

    Information compiled and provided by Christopher-Peter: Maingot; without prejudice, malice aforethought, ill will, vexation, or frivolity.

    Comment by Christopher-Peter | October 17, 2009

  47. [...] Dr. Russell Baylock has warned, the adjuvant squalene is linked to the Gulf War Syndrome. Soldiers who took the anthrax [...]

    Pingback by German Chancellor, Ministers Get Special Vaccine Without Soft Kill Ingredients : Infowars Ireland | October 17, 2009

  48. [...] stated in the New England Journal of Medicine that adjuvants do not improve antibody response. As Dr. Russell Baylock has warned, the adjuvant squalene is linked to the Gulf War Syndrome. Soldiers who took the anthrax [...]

    Pingback by SWINE FLU: Pandemic Updates - Page 46 - Politics & Current Affairs Forum | October 18, 2009

  49. [...] Dr. Russell Baylock has warned, the adjuvant squalene is linked to the Gulf War Syndrome. Soldiers who took the anthrax [...]

    Pingback by German Chancellor, Ministers Get Special Vaccine Without Soft Kill Ingredients « Dochand’s Blog | October 18, 2009

  50. [...] Dr. Russell Baylock has warned, the adjuvant squalene is linked to the Gulf War Syndrome. Soldiers who took the anthrax [...]

    Pingback by German Chancellor, Ministers Get Special Vaccine Without Soft Kill Ingredients | My Free Press | October 19, 2009

  51. Hi All re-N1H1 adjuvant based vaccine, I am a Gulf War veteran 1991, Airborne forces class 1 medic, I was given multiples of vaccines containing squalene, also whooping cough pertusis, i developed pains joints low back, parasthiesia left leg, rashes torso head and neck, by 1993 I had gone from a paratrooper fit to parachute anywhere in the world to someone who could not run for a bus, I have autoimmune disease L/H I do not make GH or Testosterone any more I inject GH in my Gut daily, Ive developed Osteoporosis
    spine, hips wrist, severe mental fatigue, mild confusion, I am on neuro-pain anti depressants pain-killers, tegratol retard, insominia, on a good day I feel like a walking dead man Dr Blaylock is correct.

    Shaun Rusling

    Comment by Shaun Rusling | October 19, 2009

  52. [...] Dr. Russell Baylock has warned, the adjuvant squalene is linked to the Gulf War Syndrome. Soldiers who took the anthrax [...]

    Pingback by Pandemic Flu Online » German Chancellor, Ministers Get Special Vaccine Without Soft Kill Ingredients | October 20, 2009

  53. Drug companies asked, “What’s the best way we can get healthy people’s money?”

    You know the answer.

    Comment by silas oaks | October 21, 2009

  54. [...] Posts Dr. Russell Blaylock: Vaccine May Be More Dangerous Than Swine FluWebBot Project Predictions for 2009 and 2010: Iran War, Depopulation, Flu Pandemic, Famine ….. and [...]

    Pingback by Dr Gary Null Speaking Out in New York State Assembly Hearing: Vaccines are Dangerous! The #1 Cause of Death in United States is American Medicine! « Socio-Economics History Blog | October 23, 2009

  55. I am confused! I’m not sure what to do, should I allow my boys 13 and 16 yrs old to have this vaccine?! Will this have serious side effects? Please help me decide!

    Comment by Evelyn | October 24, 2009

    • Hi,

      I won’t recommend it. Even if your kids catch this swine flu, it is very mild. Many would say milder than the seasonal flu.

      rgds
      mosesman

      Comment by mosesman | October 24, 2009

    • My daughter (12) had the swine flu. She got it from a boy that got the nasal spray vaccine. She was sick for three to four days, and loved through it with no problems.

      My suggestion, based on our experience, is to NOT to get the vaccine. Do not expose your children to potentially deadly side effects if it is not necessary. Again, do NOT get the vaccine.

      Comment by Hairless Monkey | October 26, 2009

  56. [...] and I found some very alarming info. Keen and Cap K are right….DO NOT GET THE N1H1 VACCINE!!! http://socioecohistory.wordpress.com…han-swine-flu/ http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p…t=va&aid=14851 and that is just 2 of the 1000s of [...]

    Pingback by Fall Vaccine Survey - Page 2 - Marijuana Growing | October 27, 2009

  57. [...] Dr. Russell Blaylock: Vaccine May Be More Dangerous Than Swine Flu Socio-Economics History Blog 1976 Swine Flu Vaccination Propaganda and The Side Effects Socio-Economics History Blog Does the [...]

    Pingback by Received H1N1 vaccine...long - Page 2 - CouponMom Forum | October 27, 2009

  58. It’s really sad when a regular everyday concerned mom of 4 young children can not make an informed and safe decision for her children because of false statements. I really don’t know what to believe. Do I or don’t I? It’s very frustrating to not know where to turn for the truth when it comes to the safety of my family. My children depend on me to make the right decision and I’m not a scientist or a doctor so have to depend on the advise of professionals but different professionals say completely different things. All I want is the truth, can anyone tell me where I can find that?

    Comment by Tanya | October 28, 2009

    • Tanya, I agree, what is a person to do. I have two children. My oldest has already gotten the swine flu vaccine with no problems or side effects to date, my youngest only got the regular flu mist, also with no problems or side effects. I have been waiting for the H1N1 flu vaccine supply to come so I can make an appt for my youngest, but with all this information of do it, dont do it, I am very confused and scarred, because what if what this Dr. says is correct, does that mean my oldest will contract autoimmune diseases that will kill him or disable him in the future? I ask is this based on actual/factual study or just belief. When I google the ingrediants the Dr. says is present in the vaccine, I find so many conflicting things. This is just so confusing and unfortunately no one has the proper answer, everyone will believe what they want.

      Comment by Kenya Johnson | November 3, 2009

      • Kenya, My children, as well as myself, were recently vaccinated as well. Personally, I think I shouldn’t even be looking around on these websites, it just makes me nervous and anxious. I am a nurse, and have several doctors that I work with and my pediatrician who all were very comfortable with the vaccines. Basically, the vaccine is made out of the same preservatives as the seasonal flu vaccine, it just has the actual H1N1 virus in it. It actually protects you against this virus,where the seasonal flu is more of a guessing game. I prayed about this, had peace about it, and did it. Don’t worry yourself to death, and what is done, is done. Everything should be fine.

        Comment by Michelle Hoernig | November 8, 2009

  59. It is sad, because you CAN know, without having to depend upon the opinions (and treachery) of men. Here is where you find all the answers for life: In the written Word of your Creator who knows how He designed you and Who has Himself given you instructions for life. It’s commonly called “The Bible” but is neglected by most of the population of the world and that is why we are in the mess we are in. Does it talk about swine flu shots specifically? No. But the PRINCIPLES are there. Now that I’ve told you where to find it, the question is, will you go there and look? (Turn back to Him, follow HIS diet plan and keep HIS laws and you probably will not be subject the illnesses and diseases the rest of the world is subject to.)

    Comment by Shuvah | October 28, 2009

    • Shuvah, Thank you for being the only person to give great advise. Turn to the Lord people and eat food the way God intended and you will not get sick. Amen Shuvah.

      Comment by scooster67 | November 4, 2009

    • Is there any vaccine against this kind of behavior ?
      Please… PLEASEEEE !!!!

      Comment by dude | November 12, 2009

  60. [...] and research institutions all found a strong link between MF-59 and autoimmune diseases. Dr. Russell Blaylock: Vaccine May Be More Dangerous Than Swine Flu Socio-Economics History Blog [...]

    Pingback by H1N1 Vaccine - Page 3 | October 29, 2009

  61. Dear Tanya,

    I was asking myself this same question. It came to me that to know the best answer, I need to trust myself. This may sound simplistic but the fact that the general population has been brainwashed into following the media without asking questions, is what has allowed these atrocities to continue for so long. Read all of the information, and then ask yourself what makes most sense.

    In a jury we look for motive. What would motivate conspiracy theories? What would motivate the government to scare us and inject us with potentially lethal vaccinations? If you are new to looking into these things, you will be appalled to find out how our world is being run. It will seem like a horror story, but it will tell you at a deep level who to trust. The only thing, after reading the info, that would make one want a flu vaccine, is FEAR. When you believe in YOUR abilities to think things through and make the right decision the fear will be gone. You will then be confident that you haven’t let yourself be lied to, that you ARE capable of figuring it out for yourself.

    The only reason many of us feel that we can’t is the mind boggling amount of media distracting us from what is truly important. Lulling us into a false sense of security by having us work ourselves raw to afford things we don’t need. Draining our mind power with having to fill out ridiculous amounts of paperwork, etc. It is a sad thing that we pay so many tax dollars to people who use the money against us. They design our lives to be so tiring and complicated so we won’t have the energy to notice the repulsive acts being done to us and ours.

    You are a mother of four children, this means that your are one of the most resourceful, capable and attentive people out there. Don’t let anyone numb your instincts, or worse, use them against you. Remembering who we are is the first step in taking our power back! I hope this helps. Albeit not a direct answer, I think it’s the one we all need!

    Comment by laura | October 31, 2009

    • Now, this is the best answer ever.

      Comment by dude | November 12, 2009

  62. Very interesting reading. Please keep me updated thanks

    Comment by beth | October 31, 2009

  63. Dr. Russell Blaylock is simply looking for attention and clearly has no problem fear mongering to get it. For every one “Dr. Russell” there are 10,000 legitimate doctors who would oppose his views.

    Comment by Ryan | November 3, 2009

  64. Life is in GOD’s hand!!! getting vaccine or not!!!

    Comment by princess | November 4, 2009

  65. [...] to spread this around. People need to know how to protect themselves. Also, see this link—- http://socioecohistory.wordpress.com…han-swine-flu/ < http://socioecohistory.wordpress.com…han-swine-flu/ > Vitamin D3 [...]

    Pingback by H1n1 Vaccination - The Hull Truth | November 4, 2009

  66. [...] Here is Dr. Russell’s account of how dangerous the vaccine is: . [...]

    Pingback by Is The Swine Flu Vaccine Safe? | The Anti Aging Clinc | November 4, 2009

  67. What is the response of Dr. Russell Blaylock to the claim that there is no 120 adjuvant in the vaccines? From what I read the adjuvant is only on hand to facilitate further experiment, supposedley to determine safety. The one thing we all now know about drugs is that we can never in the short term know long term effects.

    Comment by robert galt | November 4, 2009

  68. So, what is someone like me to do here? I have sarcoidosis, an autoimmune disease, which has affected most of my internal organs. I lost my spleen to it, as it was feared I had lymphoma at the time. I refused steroids and am on an experimental protocol which does not allow me any Vitamin D foods, so I cannot boost that with a fish oil adjuvant, which could drive my innate immune system into overdrive and cause life – threatening issues. Yet, I am considered ‘ high risk’ and am being pressured to have the shot ‘ rather than succumb to flu complications’, which in my case, is a real possibility. Also, I am a high school teacher and have a front line job, exposing me to far more chance of getting the virus than most other folk. I really fear the vaccine, but also fear the flu, in my case. I could ask for non – adjuvanted shot, which should be available in the next few weeks to pregnant women, but I would still be pumping my body with other things which really should not be there, no matter how small the amount. I feel really confused at to what is the best route for me to take this winter. Help!

    Comment by Karen | November 5, 2009

  69. Everyone is experiencing pneumonia and shortness of breath is this caused by the HINI?

    Comment by Gayle | November 5, 2009

  70. There are more people killed each year in car accidents.Much more than the H1N1 or seasonal flu will kill. Are we all going to stop driving our cars? Ultimatley, God is in control, and we should submit ourselves to him. He will direct our path, and if it includes a flu shot, then so it shall be.

    Comment by Michelle Hoernig | November 8, 2009

  71. [...] Propaganda and The Side Effects Dr. Russell Blaylock on 1976 Swine Flu and Current Outbreak Dr. Russell Blaylock: Vaccine May Be More Dangerous Than Swine Flu Ron Paul: Be Careful of the Rush into the Swine Flu Vaccine. 1976 Swine Flu Vaccine [...]

    Pingback by Former Finland Health Minister Speaks Out Against Swine Flu Vaccine and Big Pharma! « Socio-Economics History Blog | November 9, 2009

  72. This is a must see….doctors not wanting to take the vaccine. Dangerous is correct and not a fully tested vaccine.
    http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2353006/everyday_products_and_the_dangerous.html?cat=69

    Comment by curious2u | November 9, 2009

  73. My family came down with the swine flu 3 months ago….we all recovered and speedily…..the cure was quite simple and worked…. OIL OF OREGANO…..4 drops per day. It cost about $35 for a very small bottle but is the most potent remedy. Many attest that coloidal silver works also but for now Oil of Oregano worked for us. It is also good for overall immunal health……TOM T

    Comment by Tom T | November 11, 2009

  74. Your site would have more credibility if you used correct grammar and spelling.

    Comment by Stormy Knight | November 11, 2009

  75. Alberta, CANADA:
    Contrary to what some of you are writing – this flu is deadly. There are more deaths in Canada being reported daily. It is especially deadly for children and those with compromised immune systems.

    My son has it and after 16 days is not fully recovered. He says he’s never been hit with anything so terrible!

    We are very much afraid of anyone coming near our 3 month old granddaughter who has a congenital heart murmur who has been infected with the flu.

    Since it cannot at this time be ascertained whether this is a hoax (Dr Blaylock’s claim), I would say – according to the current evidence – GET the vaccine – and worry about the possible side effects later – those you might be able to do something about! However, if you or your children die within 48 hours of being infected with the H1N1 flu – that is not reversible! You can’t bring them back!

    re: Oreganol -(Oil of Oregano) – that is the greatest treatment ever! I’ve used it many many times for treating many different kinds of things – such as colds, toothache, sore throats, etc. Oreganol is a very powerful antibiotic/antiseptic, and seems to work on both viruses and bacteria! Don’t be afraid of using lots – I take a whole eye-dropper full at a time, for quick results!

    To cure a tooth abscess: put a few drops on some cotton batting, and place against the gum and tooth – leave it there and, overnight the abscess will be gone, and if the tooth was loose, it will again tighten again. Works a lot better and faster than any prescription antibiotic I’ve ever had! And, it will save a tooth!

    Comment by Terry Siemers | November 11, 2009

  76. I read here: http://nwoobserver.wordpress.com/2009/11/01/wanted-for-mass-murder-barack-obama-margaret-chan-dr-thomas-frieden/#comment-2139

    … that the US government has ‘changed’ the laws to focus on the use of non-lethal viruses instead of using lethal viruses because the latter are considered to be illegal in bio-terrorism laws of the US constitution.

    That explains what Joseph Moshe was trying to tell everybody and why Baxter are producing drugs to alter human immune systems.

    The US government are allowing the use of vaccines to destroy the immunity against NON-lethal viruses, which means that they are NOT breaking any laws when they release those viruses into populations and kill millions, if not billions, of people.

    Evil. Pure evil!

    Comment by curiouskath | November 14, 2009

  77. We have become a society that seeks attention and wants the Doctors to fix everything with a pill or a vaccine. We waste countless hours at the DR. office or emergency for menial pains or sniffling noses. Our diets and life styles are contributing to our illness along with the stress in our world. I have never had a flu shot and this past March was the first time in over 20 years I developed the flu. Yes I was extrememly ill but have recovered, and I know my body has increased it’s immunity. I worked at a front desk of a motel chain and was in contact with people from Mexico, Egypt, Europe Africa Australia the US and many more countries. Most likely the flu was contracted from one of them. My body with the help of antibiotics fought the virus and overcame it. I have no other health problems and do not take any meds of any kind, and I am 62. I am a lay person without any degrees in the medical field and can not comment on the composition of the vaccines, but I am a free thinker and do not jump at the terror our gov’t puts into the general populace about a pandemic of flu. I like to do research on what I am told over the media which quite often they report what they are told to report. People are like a bunch of sheep or lemmings and follow the crowd. I too believe that the HIV virus was man made and so is this latest one, it is easy enough to do genetic engineering with our food so why not viruses. This has been around since AGEnt Orange and the Gov’t has no regard for human life and does not really care about the citizens of the country. The bottom line is the money that can be generated and this time the pockets of the drug companies are overflowing more than ever. Do you really believe the families of these companies take this dangerous vaccine? Knowing what we know about the way the world is run by a handfull of powerful men then your answer must be not. Kuddos to all of you who have the brain to think do your research and say No Thank You, my body belongs to me and I will manage it on my own and most likely be healthier in the long run.The more advanced mankind gets sometimes the stupider we get. Use your intelligence,keep your body in shape feed it properly and don’t be part of the sheep mentality.

    Comment by shirley | November 25, 2009

  78. Look what a man posted on a youtube video about swine flu :

    Anymajordude5

    I got 4 swine flu shots. Kept going to different doctors because my regular doctor would only give me one. I don’t want to die, but even with all the extra insurance shots, I am feeling weak and fatigued. I think the vaccines are not strong enough..I need to get more shots. omg im freakin out here seriously. I don’t want to die. I’m pretty sure I’m going to get the swine flu cus I get two to three flus a year. I am vulnerable to flu. I’m gazacked.

    I to think swine flu vaccines are more dangareous then the virus itself. I now have swine flu and i can just say its nothing its just like the regural flu i have a treatment and my loungs are intact… i Have no complications and for about 3-4 days im like new. :)

    Comment by Nemanja | November 27, 2009

  79. I just have to say one more thing the swine flu in my country is only deadly to people who are allready ill or have problems with theirs imune system. I’m form Serbia and the flu in my country isn’t that serious. Its like it weakened and is different from the one in Mexico.

    Comment by Nemanja | November 27, 2009

  80. Dear Dr. Blaylock;
    Please read my situation and contact me, I am scared …. I have not discussed this incident with any one as I did not think it could had been related to H1N1 even it was odd and unusual incident. I have had many flare ups with Fibromyalgia, but this one was different. I also have high pain threshold.

    I only called my physical therapist, but could not get any help. I took Ibuprofen q4 hrs, steamed heat, hot shower almost q 3 hrs, and cried. It took about 3 and a ½ day, more than 72 hours to calm down.

    As a healthcare provider, I was required to be vaccinated with both Seasonal flu on 10/21/09 in my left arm, and H1N1 on 10/29/09 in my right arm .

    I live with well managed Fibromyalgia (a neuro-muscular chronic condition as you know) without the use of any regular medication. On 11/12/09, the 15th days of H1N1, I had some muscle spasm that made me very uncomfortable at work. It was located on back side of the right neck (same side I had H1N1), and involved right shoulder and right upper back. I ignored it and went to work on 11/13/09, took Ibuprofen that took the edge of the pain. By late evening, it was very bad. I took hot hot shower, placed moist heating pad and went to bed. By 3:00 AM 11/14/09, it was so bad that swallowing saliva created pain in the right inner throat , but it was different than sore throat pain. I did not call or discuss this with my treating Rheumatologist as I am not following his Rx for Cymbalta (I do not like to take medication on regular basis for my Fibromyalgia. During this long episode, when I was so desperate with the pain, I took Cymbalta 30 mg twice in addition to Ibuprofen.

    Also, I should mention that my right rotator cuff had a small tear that happened aout a little over a year ago. So I thought it was a combination factors aggravating Fibromyalgia. Now, reading your e-mail concerns me a great deal. Please reply. How long after the onnaculation complications can manifest? Do you think that this incident is related to H1N1 injection? If so, has there been another incident that you are aware of? And, finally, people need to communicate and clarify concerns in this nature. Thank you for your time.

    Comment by N. Javan, RN, MSN | December 1, 2009

  81. Good Afternoon Dr. Blaylock:
    I was watching you recently on Dr. Becker’s program and
    you mentioned berberine as a good alkoloid to lower blood
    surgar. Do you have a source for isolated berberine?
    What other supplements did you recommend for lowering
    blood sugar? Thanks for exposing the dangers of flu shots.
    DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY YOU ARE ONE OF THE FEW TO EXPOSE THIS.
    Seems like media ignores all the data on adverse
    side effects. Again thanks so much for informing the
    public of this and other ways to use natural supplements.
    James

    Comment by James Bogle | December 5, 2009

  82. [...] veroorzaakt auto-immuun ziektes’ In een ander artikel schrijft Dr. Russell Blaylock dat het H1N1 (Mexicaanse) griepvaccin om diverse redenen [...]

    Pingback by Griepvaccin bevat 1 miljoen keer meer squalene dan veroorzaker Golfoorlog Syndroom « Sp00kje Punt NL | December 5, 2009

  83. very very nice

    Comment by اس ام اس عاشقانه عشق شعر عاشقانه | December 6, 2009

  84. Please see http://www.snopes.com/medical/swineflu/vaccine.asp

    This is not true.

    Comment by Eric in Chicago | December 7, 2009

  85. [...] To read the entire article, see [...]

    Pingback by The Health Authorities and Mainstream Misleadia | Teh Looker | December 19, 2009

  86. It’s really great and really helpfull for my understanding.

    Off course, vaccine more dangerous than flu, it will kill us slowly but sure.

    Hope that you can provide much more information in the near future.

    Thanks

    Comment by Mednutz | December 22, 2009

  87. if you’re interested in a personal perspective, in narrative, about vaccine safety and government behaviour, check out http://bennymay.wordpress.com/

    Comment by bennymay | January 5, 2010

  88. Great info on link building.. It will guide many in building good links on the Web

    Comment by Usdating | January 10, 2010

  89. Yes, everything what Dr. Russell says it is true. I am CAnadian, after I took the vaccine less then a week I was in coma, loosing my brain, having a heart attack and my brain, lungs, heart they went crazy. It started like a terrible flu, nose running, nose bleeding, terrible nausea and vomiting, loosing my brain and asking Jesus and mother Mary every hour to keep me in life. Today I am not better, I can’t walk at all from the brain and I lost all my jobs and job offers. I am a chemical engineer and a chemist, I didn’y do any research before taking this vaccine. Also my immune system is compromised since sars in 2005 when i had series of pneumonias and lost my thyroid after the viral infection went to thyroid, but never been so sick in my life. I had developed encephalitis. Please believe and research who are the Rockefellers.

    Comment by Monica | January 18, 2010

  90. the bottom line with the concern with GP120 etc is by all appearances is that no one knows what is in these vaccines.

    Why would anyone believe the evil doers that want to conclude the lives of approximately 80-90% of the world population as is and was discussed at UN forums and Agenda 21.

    For anyone to suggest this is just another conspiracy theory, I would like to remind them when the evidence takes it from theory to possibility, then it takes on feet and becomes a possible reality.

    Lets not put our heads in the sand and pretend the government is can do no wrong and that they are here to protect us. This coulnd’t be further from the truth.

    Money motivates these evil doers and the Central banks financing both sides of any conflict are smack dab in the middle.

    Just like patients, live or die, the doctors still get paid.

    Comment by John | February 16, 2010

  91. [...] added to increase the immune response. Stabilizers are used to prolong shelf life. I found another article by Dr. Blaylock in which he singles out adjuvants. He in particular brings up MF-59, which contains [...]

    Pingback by Pointless Incessant Barking » Vaccine safety – final installment – contamination | February 25, 2010

  92. This is Hannah Bevills, I am an editor with Hospital.com. We are a medical publication whose focus is geared towards promoting awareness on hospitals, including information, news, and reviews on them. Given the relevance of what you are offering from your site and what our mission is, I feel we may be able to collaborate in some way or another, I look forward to your response regarding the matter. Thanks!

    Hannah Bevills
    hannah.bevills@gmail.com
    Hospital.com

    Comment by Hannah | May 11, 2010

  93. [...] An outbreak of swine flu occurred in Mexico this spring that eventually affected 4,910 Mexican citizens and resulted in 85 deaths. By the time it spread to the United States, the virus caused only mild cases of flu-like illness. Read more… [...]

    Pingback by To Vaccinate or NOT To Vaccinate, That is The Question? (September 09) « Renaissance To Wellbeing | May 18, 2010

  94. really a fantastic blog post and I appreciate about your work is that you have mentioned a lot of information that was actually relevant to the work

    miramarlagunabeach.com : drug rehab

    Comment by miramar | June 23, 2010

  95. [...] Propaganda and The Side Effects Dr. Russell Blaylock on 1976 Swine Flu and Current Outbreak Dr. Russell Blaylock: Vaccine May Be More Dangerous Than Swine Flu Ron Paul: Be Careful of the Rush into the Swine Flu Vaccine. 1976 Swine Flu Vaccine Killed People! [...]

    Pingback by Flu Jab Linked To Fits In Under Fives! A Tenfold Increase In Fits! « Socio-Economics History Blog | August 3, 2010

  96. Hello folks,
    This is my opinion of the flu vaccine, I think it is a money making business just like pharmceutical drugs are and the vaccine industry’s goal is to rake in as much big bucks as they can so they can make people sicker from the vaccine itself and the health care industry can really make a profit. IT IS ALL ABOUT MONEY!!!!!!!! The whole health care industry just wants your money to make you poorer and sicker in the long run.
    I for one will not take the flu shot. I plan to boost my immune system with supplements and herbals. I am an avid supporter of holistic health anyway and fully believe in taking care of my health the all natural and holistic way. I am beginning to think now if the flu shots I had in the past didn’t conribute to my celiac disorder, I know the vaccines suppress the immune system and celiac is an autoimmune disorder anyway. Just wondering. I sure don’t get them anymore after reading all the bad info. about them. And I believe everything I read sbout them. after all, they all can’t be wrong.

    Comment by Michelle rae Taylor | September 11, 2010

  97. You completed certain fine points there. I did a search on the issue and found a good number of people will agree with your blog.

    Comment by Nickole Amodei | November 29, 2010

  98. Hello !
    Please cancel my subscription to NMX*BLAYLOCK
    REPORT.
    (800-4854350FL)
    On Nov 24/2010 $10.90 USD was charged to my CIBC visa account. ($11.44 Can D)
    Please cancel all further issues !
    Thank you
    Tom Dudas
    trumpet7@telus.net

    Comment by Tom Dudas | December 13, 2010

  99. [...] Propaganda and The Side Effects Dr. Russell Blaylock on 1976 Swine Flu and Current Outbreak Dr. Russell Blaylock: Vaccine May Be More Dangerous Than Swine Flu   Scientists fear MMR link to autism New American research shows that there could be a link [...]

    Pingback by Scientists Fear MMR Link To Autism! Vindication of Dr. Andrew Wakefield ! « Socio-Economics History Blog | January 25, 2011


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 712 other followers

%d bloggers like this: